Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1989


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture / Soil

Agriculture / Forestry

Water Resources

Education / Training

Forestry

Mapping from Space

Oceanography

Land Use

Digital Image Processing 1

Digital Image Processing 2

Geology

Environment

Integrated Remote Sensing and GIS for Natural Resources Management

National Papers

Poster Sessions
  • Poster Paper 1
  • Poster Paper 2



  • ACRS 1989


    Poster Session
    Printer Friendly Format

    Page 1 of 3
    | Next |


    Land use planning in conjunction with nature:- A case study in Amethi

    A. Ghosal, S. Ghosh
    C/- O. R. Unit, CSIR Complex NPL campus
    Pusa New Delhi-12 India


    Abstract
    Since time immemorial, agricultural practices have kept pace with nature in spatial context. Natural factors like calinity/alkalinity (indicated PH). Texture-that refers to the permeability of soil and irritability which refers to slope, depth of water table etc. have been quantified at village level-the unit of decision-making. Proper weightage has been given to each factor through statistical analysis. Finally, a composite rank has been arrived at indicating the suitability of the land for agricultural/other practices. The model pertains to assessment and quantification of natural support for different land use pattern under different agroclimatic constraints.

    Introduction
    The crux of land use planning for a region is to make the best use of its natural ingredients by adopting strategies, which make it productive either through agricultural or industrial development. According, the first step is to set p a knowledge base regarding various agro-economic characteristics. e.g. water availability, rainfall, soil characteristics (salinity/alkalinity indicated by Ph values in different portions of the region, texture of soil) depth of water table, population distribution, etc. The second step is to make an assessment of the agricultural (or industrial) potential on the basis of specific norms, and of the actual state of development attained at present. The third and final step is to compare potentials of various subareas of the region with their states of development in respect of agricultural or industrial development, and make recommendations for further growth in the future.

    This paper briefly reports an in-depth study made in the Amethi block of Sultanpur district under the aegis of the Natural Resource Data Management System of the Department of Science and Technology, govt. of India. This block has 85 villages; hence spatial characteristics at the village level have been identified through a computerized knowledge base. The concerned area is mainly agricultural and does not have any minerals for industrial exploitation. Accordingly the study has been focused on the assessment of agricultural potential along with evaluation of the present state of development. A simple statistical method has been suggested for assessing agricultural potential in the form of an index; likewise a measure for present state of development has also been made. The models which form the basis of the study have been explained in subsequent sections.

    Assreement of potential.
    Agricultural potential of each of 85 villages in the Amethi Block has been assessed with the help of three factors, viz. salinity, soil texture and irrigability. The salinity criterion has been given three ranks: 1 for PH value less than 8.5, 2 for PH value ranging between 8.5 and 9.5 and 3 for PH value exceeding 9.5 Soil texture has been given three ranks-1 for loam texture, 2 for clayey loam and 3 for clay texture. Ranks 1 to 4 for irrigability have been decided on the basis of multiple criteria through a system of heuristics which can be applied for future construction of expert systems. Ranking has been done such that a low rank suggests better quality and a high rank suggests worse quality. For a specific village, if the same weightage be given to three criteria as above, the total of ranks, or composite rank (C.R.) will be 3 for the best potential and 10 for the worst potential.

    Irritability ranking is bases on the information of slope, erosion resistance and depth of water table.

    Logically, the composite rank as a measure of agricultural potential should also include the criterion of water availability, either through the data on rainfall, river discharge or availability of ground water. Detailed information on ground water availability was not available till the paper has been prepared; however a study is being done to collect this information. There is only one rain gauge station in the region under review, so it has been assumed that the entire block received almost the same amount of rainfall through years. Accordingly, the composite rank developed for each village gives a measure for relative potential within the block rather than on a global basis.

    While refining the composite rank, a method of weightage of three criteria by factor analysis (a well-know statistical technique, see Kendall and Stuart (Ref. 4) has been developed. The weightage may be additive or multiplicative.

    Classification of 85 villages according to potential has been presented in Figure 4.

    Page 1 of 3
    | Next |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book