Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1990


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Keynote Paper

Agriculture / Soil

Agriculture / Forestry

Water Resources

Education / Training

Forestry

Mapping from Space

Oceanography

Land Cover / Land Use

Digital Image Processing 1

Digital Image Processing 2

Geology Disaster 1

Geology Disaster 2

Environment

Global Change of Environment

Poster Sessions
  • Poster Paper 1
  • Poster Paper 2



  • ACRS 1990


    Environment


    The application of Remote Sensing and GIS for Phu Rua National Park Zoning, Loei Province, Thiland


    Initially weighing was design be obtained from questions districted t exerts and people concerned such as foresters envirnmentsits soil scientists and people concerned such as foresters, environmentalists, soil scientists and tourists. But the weighting score of the ordinal significant scale varied too much, because of the different knowledge a background of the respondents. This study used scores received only from forests. The scores are shown in Table 3. from this table it was found that slope, water, and accessibility are significant factors of an Intensive Use Zone. Slope, accessibility, and wildlife habitat are important for an outdoor recreation zone. Vegetation type and wildlife habitat are significant factors of a primitive zone, a strict nature Reserve Zone and a recovery zone. Soil is important for a Recovery zone for considering erosive and suitability.

    According to ranks and weights the formula of the zoning model can be express follows:

    IUZ : 6.2rl+6.1r2+6,7r4+7.5r6+9.7r7+5r8
    ORZ : 7.7 r1 +7r2+6r3+3+8.2r4+6,9r5+7,5r6+8,2r7+8r8
    PZ : 8.7r1+4.2r2+4r3+5,2r4+4.2r5+4,1r6+2.6r7+8.1r8
    SNRZ : 8.2r1+4.542+3.7r3+4.7r4+4.2r5+3r6+2.1r7+9.6r8
    RZ : 8.5r1+5.5r2+7r3+4.5r4+4r5+5.7r6+4.6r7+8.1r8

    where r1, r2, r3, r4, r5, r6, r7, and r8 are the ranking score of the value of each charcteristics as presented in Table 2. respectively.

    The third stage of the process was identification of suitability mapping for each zone. The ranks, weights and zoning models were written to perform the calculation of 8 variables by the defining look up table. The result of this stage was a suitability map for each of the zones, showing areas varying from suitable, moderate to not suitable. In the end these images were superimposed in order to get the final suggestion for management zoning . The criteria to revise the five preliminary zone boundaries consist of zone suitability class, and zone priority. If zones have the same suitable class, the priority is ranked from SNRZ, ORZ, PZ, IUZ, and RZ according to park goals and objectives that want to protect rare species, to provide outdoor recreation opportunities as well as to preserve water recharge area.

    The existing facilities and outdoor recreation sites added directly to determine the suitability class of the Intensive Use Zone and suitability class of an Recreation zone respectively.

    Results
    1. Obtaining the five management Zones

      The results of the four stages mentioned above are 5 management zone maps. All maps have three suitability classes of suitable, moderate and not suitable. The suitability scores were grouped into 3 classes: low , medium and high suitability. These data are used as guild lines and suggestions about where and activity will be located For example when the park officers want to enlarge the recreation area, they would consider the area of high suitability for this class as the first priority.

    2. Final management Mapping

      The final management zone map is made by considering suitability class, and zone The results of the face management zones and final map will be discussed during presentation.
    Acknowledgement
    The authors would like to thank the Japanese Government for funding support, and the National Research Council, the Mineral resource Department as well as the Royal Forest department for providing data. We are also grateful for the co-operation of all respondents and the park superintendents for providing accommodation and transformation during field work. Our thanks are expressed to Mr. FGeir-Harald Strand for teaching ARC/ INFO

    References
    1. Burrough, P.A. 1986 Principles of Geographic Information systems for Land resources Assessment . Oxfords U.S.A

    2. Chairangsri, c. 1989 geology of the Phu Rua National Park; Report Thailand

    3. Faculty of forestry 1987 Assessment of National Parks, Wildlife sanctuaries and other Preserves development in Thailand Bangkok Thailand

    4. Hopkins, L.D. 1979 method for generating Land suitability maps: A Comparative Evaluation : AIP Journal U.S.A

    5. Mackinnon J.K Child , G. Thorsell J 1986 Managing Protected Areas in the Tropics IUCN Switzerland.

    6. Kankhamson, B. 1989 The use of Remote sensing in Assessing Deforestation and Its Effective on Environment in Thailand. Manuscript, AIT, Bangkok, Thailand .
    Page 2 of 2
    | Previous |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book