Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1995


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Plenary Session

Forest / Vegetation Mapping

Agriculture/Soil

Mapping from Space

Water / Marine Resources

Disital Image Processing

Global / Regional Change Study

Land Degradation

Workshop on Education and Traning

Workshop on Spatial Information Processing

Poster Sessions
  • Poster Session 1
  • Poster Session 2
  • Poster Session 3
  • Poster Session 4



  • ACRS 1995


    Global/Regional Change Study
    Land Cover Classification System for Continental/Global Applications

    (c): The latest project to map global land cover by remote sensing is being done by the IGBP-DIS Land Cover Working Group which has established land cover classification system based on Running's methodology (Running 1994). In this classification system, forest are divided into four main classes such as Evergreen Broadleaf, Evergreen Needleleaf, Deciduous Broadleaf, and Deciduous Needleleaf. These four classes are introduced to the proposed classification system because discrimination of these classes are important for global change studies.

    For example, Evergreen forest and shrubland (60) is included in Evergreen forest or shrubland (14), Forest or shrubland (12) and Vegetation (10). Therefore an explanation of Evergreen forest and shrubland (60) includes the explanation of the classes, 14, 12 and 10. That is, "Evergreen canopy cover > 60%" must be added to the explanation of Evergreen forest and shrubland (60)

    Table l(a) Proposed land cover classification system (LCWG, AARS) September 1995

    Table 1 (b) Explanation of land cover classes
    Class code: Class name and Explanation
    10: Vegetation
    Vegetation but cannot be interpreted into any class from 12 to 184; hereafter the meaning of the underlined part is written like (12-184)
    12: Forest or shrubland (14-120)
    Forest or shrubs canopy cover is > 60%
    14: Evergreen forest or shrubland ( 16-60)
    Canopy is never without green foliage. Evergreen canopy cover > 60%
    16: Evergreen forest (18-36)
    Forest canopy cover is > 60%. Tree height is exceeding 2 meters.
    18: Evergreen broadleaf forest (20-25)
    20: Natural evergreen broadleaf forest
    22: Evergreen broadleaf tree crops (23-25)
    23: Oil palm
    24: Coconut
    25: Others
    36: Evergreen needleleaf forest
    42: Evergreen shrubland (44-48)
    shrubs canopy cover is > 60%. Tree height is less than 3 meters.
    44: Natural evergreen needleleaf shrubland
    46: Evergreen shrub crops (47-48)
    47: Tea
    48: Other evergreen shrub crops
    60: Evergreen forest and shrubland
    10% < forest canopy cover < 60% 10% < shrub canopy cover < 60%
    70: Deciduous forest or shrubland (72-110)
    With an annual cycle of leaf-on and leaf -off periods. Deciduous canopy cover > 60%.
    72: Deciduous forest (74-90)
    Forest canopy cover is > 60%. Tree height exceeding 3 meters.
    74: Deciduous broadleaf forest (76-80)
    76: Natural deciduous broadleaf forest
    78: Deciduous broadleaf tree crops (79-80)
    79: Rubber
    80: Other deciduous broadleaf tree crops
    90: Deciduous needleleaf forest
    92: Deciduous shrubland (94-98)
    Shrub canopy cover is > 60%. Tree height is less than 3 meters.
    94: Natural deciduous shrubland
    96: Deciduous shrub crops (97-98)
    97: Cotton
    98: Other deciduous shrub crops
    110: Deciduous forest and shrubland
    10% < forest canopy cover < 60%
    10% < shrub canopy cover < 60%
    120: Mixed forest or shrubland
    Neither evergreen nor deciduous forest or shrubs exceeds 60% of coverage.
    130: Grassland (132-145)
    Tree and shrub cover is less than 10%.
    132: Natural grassland / pasture
    140: Grass crops (141-145)
    include cereal and other grass type crop
    141: Paddy
    142: Wheat
    143: Sugarcane
    144: Corn
    145: Other grass crops
    160: Mixed vegetation
    10% < forest or shrub canopy < 60%
    10% < grass cover < 60%
    include savanna and mixed land with cropland, shrubland, forest and few houses
    170: Wetland (172-174)
    172: Mangrove
    174: Swamp
    Any type of wetland with vegetation except mangrove
    180: Little vegetation (182-184)
    Vegetation cover is more than 10 % at the peak season
    182: Tundra
    184: Others
    190: Non vegetation (191-210)
    Vegetation cover is less than 10 % at any time of a year
    191:.Bare ground (192-195)
    192: Rock
    193: Stones or gravel
    194: Sand
    195: Clay
    200: Perennial snow or ice
    210: Built-up area
    220: Water (222-226)
    222: Inland water
    Lake, pond, river, reservoir
    224: Water with seasonal change
    Inland water with dry period
    226: Tidal flat

    (d): One of the main concern in land use management and planning in Asian countries is agricultural land. 'j Therefore main crop types are included in the classification system.

    (e): Unique land cover classes in African or American continent can be added as a new class.

    (f): The proposed land cover classification system is not a fixed one. It can be improved by addition of : classes or modification of system. For example, once all forest and all shrubland in the global area are -classified correctly, "Forest or shrubland (12)" will be removed and new classes, "Forest" and : "Shrubland" , will come to the second highest level of the hierarchical system. And "Evergreen forest ( 16)" ..and "Deciduous forest (70)" will be included in the "Forest" (g): Classification of Forest, Shrubland, and Grassland

    (g): For the purpose of global change studies, the discrimination of vegetation into forest, shrubland, and grassland is important. Shrubs is small woody plants that are branched from the base. The proposed system used a threshold value of 3 meters height to distinguish shrubland from forest. As shown in Figure l(a), there are logically seven categories in the combination of forest, shrubland and grassland such as F, S, G, FS, SG, FG, FSG in the figure. Since the category of FSG is too detail, FSG is divided into Mfs, Msg, and Mfg and these three are combined to FS, SG, and FG, respectively (see Figure 1 (b ". By this alternation, seven categories are reduced to six categories. Moreover, since the discrimination between forest and shrubland by low-resolution satellite remote sensing data is difficult, two categories, "Forest" and "Shrubland" are combined into a larger category, "Forest or shrubs". Similarly, FG and SG are combined into a larger category," Mixed vegetation". Finally, seven categories in the figure are merged into three categories such as "Forest or shrubs (code: 12; F, S, FS, and Mfs)", "Grassland (code: 130; G)", and "Mixed vegetation (code: 160; FG, SG, Mfg, and Msg)" as shown in Figure l(c).


    Figure 1 Forest, Shrubland and Grassland

    (h): Cropland is divided into tree crops (code: 22 or 78), shrub crops (code: 46 or 96) and grass crops -0: (code: 140) because the discrimination between cropland and natural vegetation by low-resolution satellite remote sensing data is generally more difficult than the discrimination between "Forest or shrubs" and " "Grassland".

    4. Examples of legends
    Based on the land cover classification system as shown in Table 1, some legends can be established. The following shows relationships between a category, "Forest" (and a category, "Shrubland"), in a legend and class codes in the land cover classification system.

    Forest: class code 16+ 18+20+22+23+24+25+36+ 72+ 74+ 76+ 78+ 79+80+90 + part of 120 + part of 12 + part of 10

    Shrubland: class code 42+44+46+47+48+92+94+96+97+98 + part of 120 + part of 12 + part of 10

    5. Conclusion
    The Land Cover Working Group of AARS proposed a new land cover classification system in this paper. Any comments or opinions about the proposed classification system are welcome to improve it. Based on the classification system, land cover dataset of Asia with 8 km resolution is developing.

    Acknowledgements
    The land cover classification system proposed in this paper has developed by the cooperation with 49working group members from 28 countries. Authors would like to thank all working group members for their valuable cooperation. Authors would also thank Dr. Colin Mitchell of ISMARSC Limited for his detail comments to the land cover classification system.

    References
    • Running, S.W., T.R. Loveland, and L.L. Pierce," A Vegetation Classification Logic Based on Remote Sensing for Use in Global Biochemical Models", Ambio, \()1.23, No.1, 1994
    • Tateishi, R., C. Wen, and K. Perera, "Working Group Report and Land Cover Database of Asia ", Proc. 15th ACRS, 17-23 Nov., 1994, pp. M
    • Tateishi,R.(Ed.), "Report of the International Workshop on Global Databases", International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. XXX, Part 4W1, Boulder, 30-31 May, 1995a
    • Tateishi,R., "Land Cover Database of Asia", Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vegetation Monitoring, Chiba, Japan, 29-31 August, 1995b
    • UNEP/FAO, "Report of the UNEP/FAO Expert Meeting on Harmonizing Land Cover and Land Use Classifications", Geneva, 23-25 November, 1993
    Page 2 of 2
    | Previous |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book