Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1996


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture/Soil

Water Resources / Hydrology

Disasters

Education / Communication

Forestry / Vegetation

Mapping

Oceanography / Meterology

Land Use

Digital Image Processing

Geoscience / DTM

GIS

Global Environment

Special Session on Applications of Remote Sensning and GIS to Land Degradation

WG: 1km Land Cover Data Base in Asia

Poster Session
  • Poster Session

  • ACRS 1996


    Water Resources / Hydrology

    Printer Friendly Format

    Page 1 of 2
    | Next |

    The Effect of Rainfall Echoes on Sar Image

    Nobuhiko Kodaria
    Remote Sensing Technology Center of Japan
    1-9-9 Reppong Minatoku, Tokyo 106, Japan

    Abstract
    One of the remarkable feature of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is its all weather capability, inn tropical region spaceborne optical sensor occasionally cannot observe a specified area over an year or more by the cloud cover, instead SAR can make observation weather independently through cloud. On the other hand, meteorological radar can detect rainfall images by the same radio waves or C-band or X-band. Most of the meteorological radar in Japan are operated by C-band. In this paper, back scattered echoes from rainfall are compared with natural ground echoes at C and band SAR.

    1. Reflectivity factor Z of rainfall.
    Rainfall target consists of great many water drops with various size distribution, and their fall speed differs each other by their size, it means that the rain drop distribution in the radar back scatter volume will change pulse to pulse by some degree. So that the Doppler sharpening for the azimuth compression becomes difficult to some extent. Synthetic aperture length for the meteorological target will extent, Synthetic aperture length for the meteorological target will depend on the phase variation between pulses and the phase different of p/4 will limit the maximum synthetic aperture length.

    In case of Shuttle Imaging Radar SIR-C/X-SAR and meteorological target azimuth compression does not work perfectly because of the target phase will chance more than p/4 during the radar travels along synthesized length of the orbit. Azimuth resolution without compression for SIR-C/X is about 1.15 km, but the meteorological target of rainstorm is usually large enough to observe its pattern and intensity by this resolution. Echo intensity will increase as the increase of the azimuth resolution, but the azimuth improvement factor will decrease down by the amount of synthetic aperture length.

    Echo volume consists of range resolution XR, azimuth resolution X, and height H, which extends up to 10 km in case of tropical convective storms.

    The rainfall rate R (mm/hr) is empirically related to the reflectivity factor Z (mm6/m3) by

    Z (mm6/m3) = åEND6 = BRb

    In this equation;
    D: raindrop diameter (mm), N: number of raindrops per unit volume,
    R: rainfall rate (mm/hr).

    The constants B and b appear to be a function of the type of storm such as thunderstorm, shower or Stratford rain. In an average B = 200 and b = 1.6 are proposed. (1) However, Z has a wide scattering aspect of about ± dB.

    Reflectivity factor s0 is(3)


    2.Calculation of reflectivity s.
    For the calculation of reflectivity of meteorological target, rainfall height must be in consideration. Table 1 shows relations between R, Z, s and attenuation constant h. The ground surface echo intensity and rainfall echo intensity are compared in Fig. 1, where rainfall heights of 1 to 10 km are assumed for the case of the SIR C/X-SAR.

    Table 1. Rainfall parameter for L,C, and X band radar.
    R mm/hr 1 10 100 400
    Z m6/m3 2x102 8x103 3x105 2.9x106
    s dB/h (km) (L) 1.9x10-8 7.4x10-7 2.8x10-5 2.7x10-4
    (C) 15x10-6 2x10-4 7.6x10-3 7.2x10-2
    (X) 6.1x10-5 2.4x10-3 9.3x10-2 9.1x10-1
    h dB/km (L) 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.04
    (C) 0.0031 0.031 0.31 1.24
    (X) 0.013 0.18 2.6 12.8
    s: reflectivity, h:attenuation by rainfall h: height of rainfall


    Figure 1 Radar reflectivity (s) vs. rainfall rate.

    Page 1 of 2
    | Next |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book