Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1998


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture/Soil

Water Resources

Disasters/Pollutions

Education/Training

Forest Resources

Mapping from Space

Oceanography/Meteorology

Land Use

Digital Image Processing

Geology/Geomorphology

GIS

Regional/Global Evironment

Poster Sessions
  • Poster Session 1
  • Poster Session 2
  • Poster Session 3



  • ACRS 1998


    Poster Session 3
    Difference in observation of Indonesian fire by DMSP-OLS and NOAA-AVHRR

    Results and Discussion
    Figure 2 shows "hot spots" detected by NOAA-AVHRR and "fire flares" detected by DMSP-OLS on 31 October. The figure suggests that more forest fires could be detected by DMSP-OLS as "fire flares" than by NOAA-AVHRR as "hot spots". The "fire flares" detected by DMSP-OLS found spatially broad, which is presumably due to scattering of scattering of lights by prevailing thin haze. Table 1 shows the dates when those fires were detected by NOAA-AVHRR or by DMSP-OLS in the study area. The "hot spots" detected by NOAA-AVHRR on 3 November serve as reference for table 1.


    Figure 2 Hot spot detected NOAA-AVHRR & Fire detected by DMSP-OLS


    Table 1 The dates when those fires were detected by NOAA-AVHRR or by DMSP-OLS in the study area

    A number of forest fires were detected initially as "fire flares" by DMSP-OLS, much sooner than being detected as "hot sports" by NOAA-AVHRR. It was presumably because NOAA-AVHRR often fails to detect "hot spots" at the onset of a fire owing to haze, while DMSP-OLS could detect "first flash" of a fire flare flawlessly. Figure 3 shows "hot spots" detected by NOAA-AVHRR, "fire flares" detected by DMSP-OS on 3 November. Some fires failed to be detected as "fire flares" by DMSP-OLS, while they were detected as "hot spots" by preat, it sounds likely that NOAA-AVHRR detected forest fires as hot spots, even in "smoldering phase" of forest fires, which is particular to the prevailing peatlands in the study area.


    Figure 3 Hot spot detected NOAA-AVHRR & Fire detected by DMSP-OLS

    Conclusion
    The multiple sensor approach was proved much more useful in monitoring the progress of a forest fire in Indonesia throughout its burning process vis-à-vis monitoring the same fire only with a single sensor. Further efforts are still required in the following aspects : (a) Development of a methodology to pinpoint a forest fire with DMSP-OLS, which has coarser resolution than NOAA-AVHRR (b) Identification of the reason why DMSP-OLS can detect a forest fire much sooner than NOAA-AVHRR. In other words, it should be examined why "fire flares" may be observed with DMSP-OLS much sooner than NOAA-AVHRR's detecting the same forest fire as "hot spots".

    References
    • Elvigde, C. D., et. al. (1997): Mapping City Light With Nighttime Data From the DMSP Operational Linescan System, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 63, 727-734.
    • Nakayama M. et. al. (1998): Contextual Algorithm Adapted for Fire Detection in Indonesia, International Journal of Remote Sensing, submitted.
    Page 3 of 3
    | Previous |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book