Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1998


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture/Soil

Water Resources

Disasters/Pollutions

Education/Training

Forest Resources

Mapping from Space

Oceanography/Meteorology

Land Use

Digital Image Processing

Geology/Geomorphology

GIS

Regional/Global Evironment

Poster Sessions
  • Poster Session 1
  • Poster Session 2
  • Poster Session 3



  • ACRS 1998


    Poster Session 3
    Density and Temperature Profile in the Lower Atmosphere at Kmitl, Thailand

    Result
    Figure 1 shows the relation between the backscattering cross section which obtain from data in log scale with altitude. After obtaining backscattering cross section, the density profile that convert from backscattering cross section profile. However, the error will be occur because the return signal that come from both mixture of various gases and the aerosol or any particle in the atmosphere so that the density profile is the average of the collection of return signal. Figure 2 illustrates the averages density with the line of standard deviation at any altitude.


    Figure 1. Backscattering cross section


    Figure 2. Average density

    Figure 3. show the comparison between the density profiles which obtains from the observation and a direct line by simulating from U. S. model. Figure 4 is the temperature that come from integrated hydrostatic equation. Moreover, in the figure 4 also compares the temperature from the observation with a direct line that come from with model. Finally, the three-difference of temperature value come from observation, model and radiosonde, respectively, as show in the Table 2.


    Figure 3. Density which obtain from observation and simulation.


    Figure 4. Temperature profile

    Table 2. Three-difference temperature value
    Altitude (m) U. S. standard (K) Observation (K) Radiosonde (+ m)
    900 282.30 - 295.35 (+9)
    1800 276.45 - 290.15 (+75)
    2700 270.60 - 285.55 (-65)
    3600 264.76 - 280.65 (-75)
    4500 258.93 287.89 275.25 (+108)
    5400 253.08 284.58 271.85 (+38)
    6300 247.24 278.04 276.85 (+38)
    7200 241.40 265.62 260.95 (-33)
    8100 235.56 258.69 254.05 (+120)
    9000 229.73 267.66 248.45 (+84)
    10800 218.06 257.23 234.15 (+93)
    11700 216.65 232.19 228.55 (-154)
    12600 216.65 238.72 219.05 (+48)
    13500 216.64 219.30 211.75 (+25)
    14400 216.65 221.29 205.95 (-131)

    Summary
    The lidar system at KMITL has been developed continuously. In this paper, the number density profile and temperature profile are determined. For troposphere or boundary layer, it is difficult to obtain the number density and temperature profile correctly because the Rayleigh lidar method uses for the backscattering, but the boundary layer has many various particle, especially the aerosol and cloud that will cause the error. However, this method is useful for the stratosphere or higher altitude.

    References
    • J. D. Klett, J. Appl. Opt., vol. 20, pp. 211-220, 1981.
    • R. M. Measures, Laser Remote Sensing: Fundamentals and Application NewYork, NY: Wiley, 1984.
    • P. B. Russell and B. M. Morley, J. Appl. Opt., vol 21, pp. 1554-1563, 1982.
    • F. G. Fernald, J. Appl. Opt., vol. 23, no5, pp. 652-653, 1984.
    • F. G. Fernald, B. M. Herman and J. A. Reagan, J. Appl Meteoro., vol. 11, pp. 482-489, 1972.
    • B. R. Clamesha, G. S. Kent, and R. W. H. Wright, J. Appl. Meteoro., vol. 6, pp. 386-395, 1967.
    • K. Parameswaran, K. O. Rose, and B. V. Krishna Murthy, J. Appl. Opt., vol. 30, pp. 3059-3071, 1991.
    Page 3 of 3
    | Previous |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book