Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1998


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture/Soil

Water Resources

Disasters/Pollutions

Education/Training

Forest Resources

Mapping from Space

Oceanography/Meteorology

Land Use

Digital Image Processing

Geology/Geomorphology

GIS

Regional/Global Evironment

Poster Sessions
  • Poster Session 1
  • Poster Session 2
  • Poster Session 3



  • ACRS 1998


    GIS
    Development of a Internet/Distributed Image Database System for Multi-sensor and Multi-source Imagery/Raster Data

    3.Logical structure of metadata
    The logical structure of metadata consists of eight major groups such as ID information, Data content , Space range character, Radiometric correction character, platform/sensor character, Time, Quality and Reference .the fig .2 shows the theoretical structure of metadata for our system.

    The above described structure of metadata cab deal with both metadata's of satellite data and of raster data like DEM. By the way the coordinate system of our system is latitude/longitude coordinate system before it is input into our database. The format of time in our metadata fields is Greenwich mean time (GMT) we choose this format to allow for input of data form all the different sources an counties. The fields used in retrieval system are sensor name , acquisition data, latitude /longitude of corners or path/row information . In our system the format of path /row isn't WRS of Landsat 1,2,3 but that of WRS of Landsat 4,5.

    Fig .2 Logical structure of metadata

    4. Data management in the system
    The physical structure of metadata of our system is based on the structure of the relational database systems . Because of the following three reasons-firstly, our database have ot manage a lot of images; secondly , to update or delete image/raster data is very easy on Internet ; and finally, the advantages I being able to extend this structure into database system of t future . hence, we used the relational database structure . fig .3 stands for the update of image/raster data.


    Fig.3 Update of Image/Raster data

    In addition, when images are stored into a database, there are two methods of managing the images within the database structure. Te first methods is that a field of the database stores images onto itself, the other method is hat the field of the database only stores the text string containing the absolutely path of storage of image data. The former method can manage both metadata's and images in one database , but, as the volume of satellite imagery is so large in size , that a large proportion of the database is consumed by the satellite image data. Therefore it is difficult to maintain and to renew a database. Further in this method only one server must process both the functions of retrieval and download , which may cause the load of network around server to go up. These problems are the demerits of this approach .

    The late method is better than the former method in some points . a database doesn't become large, as the later method only deals with text sting . therefore the management of database is very simple . moreover , the load of network around server is avoided being too high, because the other file transfers sever deals with the process of download.

    Our system can renew both metadata's and images on internet, if the user is his physical distance from the main system. That is to say that lots of researchers can administer the database, if they have the requisite permissions . therefore, as management of database on our system is the management of distributing style, an administrator' work is share and all researchers as datasets supplier cab participate in our system.

    5. conclusion
    1. we have developed the image database system in which the user can simultaneously find the availability of different sensed data based on the user's given location .
    2. Our system is independent of the operation system such as Windows, Macintosh and other as we use the features supported by t commonly used web browser software's
    3. A lot of researchers as datasets supplier who are at anywhere can take part in this system for using internet.
    4. The management of database of our system is available on Internet
    6. Future Work
    • we will improve our database system in order to use others datasets of lots of sensors and vector datasets.
    • We will combine our database system with application such as automosaicing software .
    • We will develop and application that automatically can input a metadata into an image database system .
    Reference
    • Japan Association on Remote Sensing : Remote Sensing Note, Japan Association on Remote Sensing ,1996
    • ISO/TC 211: Geographic information/Geomantic, ISO/TC 211 Secretariat, 1998
    • Toshifumi Masunaga: Foundation of Relational Database ( in Japanese ), Ohmsha 1990
    • Laure Lemay: A guide of HTML ( in Japanese ). TOPPAN Printing Co. Ltd., 1996.
    • Ryosuke Shibasaki: Introduction of Geographic Information System ( in Japanese ), Japan Association of Surveyors, 1995.
    Page 2 of 2
    | Previous |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book