Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1998


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture/Soil

Water Resources

Disasters/Pollutions

Education/Training

Forest Resources

Mapping from Space

Oceanography/Meteorology

Land Use

Digital Image Processing

Geology/Geomorphology

GIS

Regional/Global Evironment

Poster Sessions
  • Poster Session 1
  • Poster Session 2
  • Poster Session 3



  • ACRS 1998


    GIS
    Application of Satellite Imagery and GIS to Wildlife Habitat Suitability Mapping

    Result and discussions
    Landuse, slope and geology maps generating from into PWS are illustrated in figure 2 (a), 2(b) and 2(c) respectively. The habitat suitability map of 7 wildlife species resulting form the spatial overlay of thematic layers in the PWS is presented in fig 3. the corresponding area for each wildlife species is show in table 2.

    Table 2 Habitat Suitability area for each wildlife species ( in percent of total area of the PWS).
    Suitability Wild Boar Barking Deer Common Palm civet Rhesus Macaque Golden jackal Sunda Pangolin Sandstone Gecko
    High
    Moderate
    Marginal
    4.08
    1.48
    94.44
    3.36
    1.12
    95.52
    13.16
    34.17
    52.67
    74.33
    8.16
    44.51
    17.73
    6.65
    75.62
    34.17
    13.16
    52.67
    2.00
    0.98
    97.02
    Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

    The information obtained provides an approach ot identify habitat suitability for wildlife species. The theme layers to be used in the modeling differ from species to species . the result revealed that the extensive area of the PWS is highly suitable for Rhesus macaque , Sunda Pangolin and Golden Jackal . in the PWS endangered species i.e sandastone outcrop and far from human activities.

    This study method identifies the current ability of anta area to provide individual wildlife species with environmental conditions needs for food cover and space. This would reflect existing vegetation cover as influenced by natural and man-caused disturbance .


    Fig.2 (a) Landuse 1997, Phusitan Wildlife Sanctury, North-east Thailand


    Fig.2 (b) Slope, Phusitan Wildlife Sanctury, North-east Thailand


    Fig.2 (c) Geology, Phusitan Wildlife Sanctury, North-east Thailand


    Fig.3 Wildlife habitat suitability map, Phusitan Wildlife Sanctuary, North-east Thailand. (a) Wild Boar (b) Barking Deer (c) Common Palm Civet (d) Rhesus Macaque (e) Golden Jackal (f) Sunda Pangolin (g) Sandstone Gecko

    Ground investigation was used t assessed the rreliablility of he model developed . three wildlife species (Rhesus Macaque , sunda Pangolin and Sandstone Gecko) could be directly observed in the field , the rest species were found only their tracts.

    In conclusion , for many wildlife species it is possible to evaluation habitat with identification of life requisite and vegetation cover . it is difficult to estimate actual population because animal population fluctuate substantially through time and space . many species are very difficult to observe directly and reliably through survey sample technique . computer based GIS provide the means to model the spatial habitat suitability effectively . accuracy of the model then relies on the knowledge based on wildlife and ecology relationships.

    References
    • Charuppat T. 1998. forest situation of Thailand in the past 37 years (1961-1998) Forest Research office Royal Forest Department.
    • Epp.H., 1988 . application satellite data ad image analysis to wildlife habitat inventory. In Land/wildlife land Classification series No. 22 land conservation Branch, Canada wildlife service. Environment Canada
    • Setlfox , H.A., 1988. wildlife resource evaluation and land/wildlife relationship models . in land/wildlife land classification series No. 22 land conservation Branch . Canada wildlife service . environment Canada.
    • Mayer. K.E.., 1984. a review of selected remote sensing and compiute technologies applied ot Tueller, P.T. 1980 . Remote sensing application for wildlife habitat management, Univ. of Nevada, Reno. NV.
    • Aggimarangsee ,N. 1992. survey for semi-Tame colonies of Macaques in Thailand . Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam soc.40:103-166.
    • Davis D.D. 1962. Mammals of the Lowland Raim Forest of North Borneo. Bull .Nat. Mus. St. Sing. 31:1-129
    • Doing, C.H. 1973. studies of the Malayan Wild Pig in Perak and Johore. Malay.Nat .Jour . 26(2): 120-151.
    • Grassman jr., L.I.1997. Ecology and Behavior of Four Sympatric Carnivore species (Mammalia : carnivora ) in Kaeng krachan National park, Thailand. MS. Thesis. Graduate School, Kasetsart University.
    • Harrison , J.L. 1962. the distribution of feedind Habit among Animals lin Tropical Rain Forest. Jour. Anim. Eco .31:53-64.
    • Lekagul , B and McNeely. 1977. mammals of Thailand. Kurusapha Ladprao Press. Bangkok.
    • Simchareon , S. 1998. Home Range of and Habitat Uses by Male Asiatic Jackal, canis aureus at Khao Nang wildlife Research Centre, Thailand. Wildlife Research Division, Royal Forest Department, Bangkok.
    • Taylor, E.H. 1963. the Lizards of Thailand. The University of Kansas Science Bulletin . 44 (14): 791-796
    Page 2 of 2
    | Previous |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book