Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1999


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture/Soil

Water Resources

Disasters

Measurement and Modeling

Land Use

Forest Resources

Mapping from Space

Oceanography/Coastal Zone

Topics Including Education

Hyper Spectral Image Processing

Image Processing

Geology

Environment

GIS

Global Change

Airborne Remote Sensing

Poster Sessions
  • Session 1
  • Session 2
  • Session 3
  • Session 4
  • Session 5
  • Session 6



  • ACRS 1999


    Poster Session 1
    Geometric and spectral analyses of Merged remotely sensed images

    Visual Image Interpretation
    As shown in Figures 4-9, it may be noted that the merged data set with SPOT XS3, SPOT PAN, and SPOT XS1 using the band substitution method has a very similar spectral appearance what the original SPOT XS has. The merged data set with SPOT XS3, digitized aerial photography, and SPOT XS1 using the band substitution method has greater spatial variability, but worse spectral details. The merged data set with SPOT XS3, digitized aerial photography, and SPOT XS1 by the band arithmetic operation method has fine geometric as well as spectral details. The results of the color space transformation and substitution method do not have good improvement as another two methods have. This is due to the SPOT XS image contain an infrared band, the transformation equations used might not be suited for.

    Unsupervised Classification
    In the unsupervised classification the spectral classes in a scene are found automatically. This approach has been found suitable for generalized land-cover mapping. There are many clustering algorithms that have been developed to determine the natural spectral classes present in a data set. A widely used clustering algorithm is the Iterative Self-Organizing Data Analysis Technique (ISODATA). This method is used, therefore, to classify the merging images. Classified data is then compare with classified data of the original SPOT XS data.

    The unclassified percentage and total accuracy of error matrix of the classification map for each merging image are listed in Table 1. The merged data set with SPOT XS3, digitized aerial photography, and SPOT XS1 by the IHS method has been found to have the lowest unclassified percentage. It means that the spectral characteristics of this merged data set is similar to what the original SPOT XS has. Furthermore, no one total accuracy of all merged data sets has exceeded 20%. It shows that the greater part of merged data set has been changed, but is still related to original one.

    Table 1. Unclassified percentage and total accuracy of error matrix of the classification map from each merging image
    Merging Method Unclassified
    percentage (%)
    total accuracy (%)
    Band substitution (SPOT PAN) 47.30 8.11
    Band substitution (Aerial data) 46.80 16.93
    IHS(SPOT PAN) 1.94 9.19
    IHS(Aerial data) 0.00 11.41
    Band operation (SPOT PAN) 41.25 13.32
    Band operation (Aerial data) 0.12 5.60

    Summary
    Three different data sets have been merged and three methods used to extract the best information from both geometric and spectral components. As mentioned above, merging the SPOT XS and digitized aerial photography into single data sets having spectral (green to near IR) and spatial (1m) properties.

    Although the IHS transformation does not have the natural visual results, the integrated images of this method still have the best classified effect.

    Merging the SPOT XS3, digitized aerial photography, and SPOT XS1 data by th use of the band arithmetic operation method has improved both geometric appearance and spectral interpretation. The resultant merged data sets also have a low unclassified percentage.

    Reference
    • Chavez, P. S., Jr., 1986. Digital merging of Landsat TM and digitized NHAP data for 1:24,000 scale image mapping, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 52(10), pp. 1637-1646.
    • Chavez, P. S., and J. A. Bowell 1988. Comparison of the spectral information content of Landsat Thematic Mapper and SPOT for three different sites in the Phoenix, Arizona Region, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 54(12), pp. 1699-1708.
    • Ehlers, M., M. A. Jadkowski, R. R. Howard, and D. E. Brostuen 1990. Application of SPOT data for regional growth analysis and local planning, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 56(2), pp. 175-180.
    • Gonzalez, R. C. and R. E. Woods 1992. Digital image processing, Addison-Wesley.
    • Grasso, D. N. 1993. Applications of the IHS color transformation for 1:24,000-scale geologic mapping: A low cost SPOT alternative, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 59(1), pp. 73-80.
    • Jensen, J. R. 1996. Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing perspective, Prentice Hall.
    • Jensen, J. R., E. W. Ramsey, J. M. Holmes, J. E. Michel, B. Savitsky, and B. A. Davis 1990. Enviromental Sensitivity Index (ESI) Mapping for Oil Spills Using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System Technology, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 4(2), pp. 181-201.
    • Schowengerdt, R. A. 1983. Techniques for Image Processing and Classification in Remote Sensing, Academic, New York.
    • Welch, R. and Ehlers 1987. Merging Multiresolution SPOT HRV and Landsat TM Data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 53(3), pp. 301-303.
    Fig 1. Aerial
    Image
    Fig 2. SPOT PAN Fig 3. SPOT XS
     
    Fig 4. Band substitution (PAN) Fig 5. Band substitution (Aerial)
     
    Fig 6. IHS (PAN) Fig 7. IHS (Aerial)
     
    Fig 8. Bands Operation
    (PAN)
    Fig 9. Bands Operation
    (Aerial)

    Page 2 of 2
    | Previous |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book