|
Modeling rice growth from characteristics of
Reflectance spectra
Chwen-Ming
Yang* and
Muh-Rong Su
Agronomist and Assistant, Department of Agronomy
Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute, Council of Agriculture
189 Chung-Cheng Road, Wufeng, Taichung Hsien,
Taiwan 41301, ROC
Tel: (886)-4-330-2301 ext.135, Fax: (886)-4-330-2806
E-mail: cmyang@wufeng.tari.gov.tw
Keywords: Modeling, Rice Growth,
Reflectance Spectra, Vegetation index, Satellite
Abstract
A three-year (1996-1998) experiment was conducted at Taiwan Agricultural
Research Institute (TARI) Experimental Farm, Wufeng to modeling of rice
growth from characteristics of reflectance spectra. The growth-waveband
relationships were analyzed by different reflectance transformation
techniques and were compared among several satellite sensors. The narrow-band
ground remotely sensed spectral data were acquired by a portable
spectroradiometer and the broad-band multispectral satellite inputs were
simulated from the ground measurements. Physical growth characters leaf
number (LN), plant height (PH), leaf area index (LAI), leaf dry weight (LDW),
and aboveground dry weight (ADW) were measured periodically. Results indicate
a diverse correlation coefficients between growth characters and different
vegetation indices and the wavebands set in satellite sensors. For linear
relationship, correlation with vegetation index (VI) was generally higher
than with single-waveband of satellites sensors. In a curvilinear
relationship, correlation between growth character (e.g. LAI) and VI (e.g.
NDVI) was greatly improved, and growth character was also better estimated
from reflectance of multi-waveband of satellite data. Results suggest that
rice growth may be reasonably assessed and monitored, either from the ground
or satellites, from characteristics of reflectance spectra when proper
wavebands are selected.
Introduction
Remote sensing technology (RS) is currently an effective tool widely adopted
in various aspects of exploitation and management of natural resources. It
provides a timely detailed spatially distributed information allowing one to
measure, monitor, and analyze the time sequence changes of target(s)
possible. In agriculture, RS has been employed to the development of
precision farming for the better of crop production and environment
protection. Nevertheless, the surface reflectance spectra over a wide range
of objects and conditions should be identified and interpreted into
meaningful outputs prior to decision-making and applications. For such
purposes, data bank including spectral properties of physical characteristics
of crops and land cover and the corresponding mathematical models have to be
established based on ground truth. The in situ remotely sensed datasets from
aircraft or satellite can therefore be reasonably resolved and reconstructed
to the original state.
Yang and Su (1997) simplified the relationship between LAI and the
near-infrared reflectance (756 nm) of rice canopy to the reverse of the
Mitscherlich function. Yang and Su (1998a, 1998b) found a curvilinear link
between growth characters (LDW and LAI) and normalized difference vegetation
index (NDVI) in rice crops from the ground spectral measurements. Su and Yang
(1999) further supported the fact by suggesting exponential formulae for
estimating the advancement of growth characters from NDVI. However, it would
be invaluable to learn whether the narrow-band models be applicable to the
broad-band measures of satellite sensors in the real world applications.
The present study is to modeling of rice growth from spectral characteristics
of vegetative cover. The growth-waveband relationships were analyzed and
compared by different reflectance transformation techniques among a number of
satellite sensors. The broad-band multispectral satellite inputs (Landsat-TM,
Landsat-MSS, and Spot-HRV) were simulated from the narrow-band ground
measurements and rice growth was assessed from physical growth characters
investigations.
Materials and Methods
Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Tainung 67) were grown in the experimental farm of
TARI, Wufeng (24° 02’ N, 120° 40’ E, elevation of 85 m) on a loam soil during
the 1st and the 2nd crops in 1996-1998. Seedlings were
machine-transplanted to north-south rows with planting density of 1.92 × 105
hills ha-1 , in 1996 and 1997, and 2.22 × 105 hills ha-1
, in 1998, respectively. Each crop had 3 plots (replicates) with plot size of
18 m × 11 m. Cultivation and fertilization followed local cultural practices
with furrow irrigation. Pest and weed control was applied as needed to avoid
pest and weed interference. Growth characters (GC) of LN, PH, LAI, LDW, and
ADW were measured periodically. PH was taken by a ruler. LN was counted at
the time of area measurements, which was determined by a portable area meter
(model LI-3000A, LI-COR Inc., USA). LAI was calculated by the area of green
leaves over unit area of land. LDW and ADW were weighted after oven-dried at
80°C for 72 h.
Radiance from the incident solar radiation and vegetative cover were acquired
under the same sun conditions to calculate reflectance spectra of rice
periodically during the growing periods of 1996-1998. The reflectance (%) of
individual wavelength was calculated by dividing the vegetation radiance
measurements with the corresponding incident solar radiation measurements
(Yang and Su, 1997, 1998a; Su and Yang, 1999). A LI-COR model-1800 portable
spectroradiometer, with 2-nm bandpasses in the range of 350-1100 nm, was used
for the ground measurements. It was connected to a quartz fiber-optic probe
(LI-1800-10) and a remote cosine receptor pointed downward in a nadir-viewing
about 1.0 m above rice vegetative surface. This distance was adjusted to
plant height, by a tripod, to scan the upward reflected radiation of canopy.
Measurements were made on clear or near cloudless days within 11:00-12:00
local standard time and the average values were used. Characteristics wavelengths
of reflectance spectra were determined by using the first order
differentiation in cope with valley and peak observations of spectral waves
over six cropping seasons (Su and Yang, 1999). Wavelengths at 554, 674, and
754 nm were selected as the characteristics wavelengths (CW). They coincide
with the absorption minimum and maximum of chlorophyll and the near-infrared
boundary of the chlorophyll red-edge, respectively. The corresponding
wavebands of LANDSAT-TM, LANDSAT-MSS, and SPOT-HRV sensors to CW are listed
in Table 1.
Table 1. Comparisons of the spectral characteristics of different
satellite sensors with the characteristics wavelengths (CW) determined from
reflectance spectra of the ground measurements.
|
|
|
Landsat-TM
|
Landsat-MSS
|
Spot-HRV
|
CW
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------- nm
--------------------
|
|
|
450-520
(TM1)
|
|
|
|
|
520-600
(TM2)
|
500-600(MSS1)
|
500-590(HRV1)
|
554(GREEN)
|
|
630-690
(TM3)
|
600-700(MSS2)
|
610-680(HRV2)
|
674(RED)
|
|
760-900
(TM4)
|
700-800(MSS3)
|
790-890(HRV3)
|
754(NIR)
|
|
|
800-1100(MSS4)
|
|
|
|
|
Six VIs were selected from the literature (Elvidge and Chen, 1995; Kanemasu,
1974; Rouse et al., 1974; Tucker, 1979) defined as the followings: (1) sum
vegetation index (SVI): NIR+RED; (2) difference vegetation index (DVI):
NIR-RED; (3) ratio vegetation index (RVI): NIR/ RED; (4) green-red ratio
vegetation index (GRVI): GREEN/RED; (5) normalized difference vegetation
index (NDVI): (NIR-RED)/(NIR+RED); and (6) soil-adjusted vegetation index
(SAVI): (NIR-RED)× 1.5/ (NIR+RED+0.5). The broad-band inputs of satellite
sensors were simulated from the ground narrow-band reflectance (Table 1).
Correlation matrices were applied for GC and wavebands and vegetation indices
comparisons. Regression analyses were performed to generate fitting-curves
and equations in order to monitoring the comparative changes of GC and
wavebands and vegetation indices as plants aged.
Table 2. Correlation coefficients for growth characters of rice and
vegetation indices (VI) calculated from characteristics wavelengths (CW) and
the simulated wavebands of different satellite sensors.
|
VI
|
Leaf
Number
|
Plant
Height
|
Leaf
area index
|
Leaf dry
weight
|
Aboveground
dry weight
|
|
Landsat-TM
|
NDVI
|
0.791
|
0.372
|
0.833
|
0.731
|
0.188
|
|
SAVI
|
0.790
|
0.374
|
0.835
|
0.734
|
0.192
|
|
RVI
|
0.815
|
0.187
|
0.881
|
0.744
|
0.071
|
|
DVI
|
0.598
|
0.535
|
0.871
|
0.818
|
0.430
|
|
SVI
|
0.284
|
0.648
|
0.683
|
0.699
|
0.609
|
|
GRVI
|
0.830
|
0.024
|
0.800
|
0.631
|
-0.048
|
|
Landsat-MSS
|
NDVI
|
0.819
|
0.318
|
0.844
|
0.730
|
0.137
|
|
SAVI
|
0.817
|
0.322
|
0.846
|
0.733
|
0.143
|
|
RVI
|
0.829
|
0.181
|
0.873
|
0.734
|
0.054
|
|
DVI
|
0.596
|
0.510
|
0.853
|
0.795
|
0.415
|
|
SVI
|
0.053
|
0.623
|
0.470
|
0.522
|
0.645
|
|
GRVI
|
0.854
|
-0.063
|
0.756
|
0.575
|
-0.142
|
|
Spot-HRV
|
NDVI
|
0.791
|
0.380
|
0.835
|
0.735
|
0.193
|
|
SAVI
|
0.786
|
0.389
|
0.839
|
0.740
|
0.202
|
|
RVI
|
0.817
|
0.200
|
0.881
|
0.747
|
0.073
|
|
DVI
|
0.591
|
0.546
|
0.870
|
0.820
|
0.439
|
|
SVI
|
0.279
|
0.654
|
0.682
|
0.700
|
0.616
|
|
GRVI
|
0.854
|
-0.022
|
0.780
|
0.605
|
-0.107
|
|
CW
|
NDVI
|
0.800
|
0.329
|
0.825
|
0.717
|
0.155
|
|
SAVI
|
0.799
|
0.333
|
0.827
|
0.718
|
0.159
|
|
RVI
|
0.798
|
0.161
|
0.874
|
0.733
|
0.071
|
|
DVI
|
0.630
|
0.475
|
0.865
|
0.798
|
0.379
|
|
SVI
|
0.306
|
0.584
|
0.667
|
0.670
|
0.558
|
|
GRVI
|
0.783
|
0.069
|
0.810
|
0.653
|
0.016
|
Results and Discussion
Typical patterns of the measured GC during the growing seasons were shown in
Figure 1. The curves were analogous to seasonal trends of NDVI in both crops
(Figure 2), suggesting that NDVI was sensitive to progression of vegetative
cover and hence be a promising parameter in estimating plant growth. The
time-sequential changes of NDVI and reflectance spectra were caused by the
‘environmental’ and ‘growth’ effects inducing significant changes in plant
structure and morphology during crop growth (Curran, 1983; Masoni et al.,
1996; Sinclair et al., 1971). The turning period of NDVI curve corresponded
to the phase transition, from vegetative growth to reproductive growth (Su
and Yang, 1999). Because of the strong background effect and senescence, it
would be better not to use NDVI in the early and the late plant development.
Table 3. Correlation coefficients for growth characters of rice and
characteristics wavelengths (CW) and the simulated wavebands of different
satellite sensors.
|
Waveband
|
Leaf
number
|
Plant
height
|
Leaf
area index
|
Leaf
dry weight
|
Aboveground
dry weight
|
|
Landsat-TM
|
TM1
|
-0.790
|
-0.339
|
-0.797
|
-0.690
|
-0.135
|
|
TM2
|
-0.754
|
-0.041
|
-0.608
|
-0.483
|
-0.187
|
|
TM3
|
0.838
|
-0.015
|
-0.718
|
-0567
|
-0.152
|
|
TM4
|
0.468
|
0.600
|
0.806
|
0.783
|
0.523
|
|
Landsat-MSS
|
MSS1
|
-0.767
|
-0.073
|
-0.638
|
-0.512
|
-0.155
|
|
MSS2
|
-0.839
|
-0.017
|
-0.697
|
-0.543
|
-0.189
|
|
MSS3
|
0.372
|
0.599
|
0.723
|
0.715
|
0.555
|
|
MSS4
|
0.391
|
0.665
|
0.762
|
0.761
|
0.582
|
|
Spot-HRV
|
HRV1
|
-0.757
|
-0.083
|
-0.632
|
-0.509
|
-0.148
|
|
HRV2
|
-0.839
|
-0.010
|
-0.711
|
-0.560
|
-0.165
|
|
HRV3
|
0.460
|
0.610
|
0.804
|
0.784
|
0.532
|
|
CW
|
GREEN
|
-0.678
|
-0.040
|
-0.530
|
-0.421
|
-0.199
|
|
RED
|
-0.828
|
-0.052
|
-0.736
|
-0.590
|
-0.107
|
|
NIR
|
0.503
|
0.538
|
0.801
|
0.764
|
0.470
|
Relations of GC and VIs were examined by correlation matrix analysis.
Generally LAI showed a better correlation with these VIs among GC in all
satellite inputs (Table 2). The relationships were further strengthened with
curvilinear functions. For instance, correlation between LAI and NDVI was
improved in an exponential relationship (Figure 3) with the determining
factors (R2 ) greater than 0.76. The predicted values of LAI were
linearly correlated to the observed values. Correlation coefficients for GC
and the simulated wavebands of different satellite sensors may be positive or
negative, whereas LAI had closer linkage in general (Table 3). By stepwise
regression to the second order of the spectral parameters, estimation of GC
can be formulated to exponential equations with R2 greater than
0.53 (data not shown). Results indicate that the normalized difference
transformation technique is suitable for the compensation of sun conditions
and the estimation of rice growth. It suggests a relative simple approach
based on correlation between GC and VI for estimating and monitoring the
ground cover and growth performance. This methodology is founded on the close
linkage in vegetation spectral characteristics and GC rather than purely
empirical curve-fitting and thus may be more universally applicable to a
variety of applications. However, such relationships may be changed and their
availability will be reduced under situations such as environmental stresses,
pests infection, low sun angle, and strong soil background effects.
The simulated results also suggest that broad-band satellite data may be
substituted for ground-based narrow-band measurements if spectral
characteristics of wavebands are well-selected. Therefore, data bank
established by narrow-band ground truth is applicable to spectral inputs
collected from satellites in assessing plant growth of a crop. Due to many
more interacting variables, however, the spectral data measured from
satellite remote sensing are considerable more complicated than those from
the ground platform. Many important parameters in relation to atmospheric and
geographic calibrations need to be taken into consideration.
References
- Curran, P. J., 1983.
Multispectral remote sensing for the estimation of green leaf index.
Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society, London, Series A, 309,
pp.257-270.
- Elvidge, C. D., and Z. Chen,
1995. Comparison of broad-band and narrow-band red and near-infrared
vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 54, pp.38-48.
- Kanemasu, E. T., 1974.
Seasonal canopy reflectance patterns of wheat, sorghum, and soybean.
Remote Sensing of Environment, 3, pp.43-47.
- Masoni, A., L. Ercoli, and M.
Mariotti, 1996. Spectral properties of leaves deficient in iron, sulfur,
magnesium, and manganese. Agronomy Journal, 88, pp.937-943.
- Richardson, A. J., C. L.
Wiegand, D. F. Wanjura, D. Dusek, and J. L. Steiner, 1992. Multisite
analyses of spectral-biophysical data for sorghum. Remote Sensing of
Environment, 41, pp.71-82.
- Rouse, J. W., R. H. Haas, J.
A. Schell, D. W. Deering, and J. C. Harlan, 1974. Monitoring the vernal
advancement and retrogradiation (greenwave effect) of natural
vegetation. NASA/GSFC Type III final report. Greenbelt, MD., USA, 371pp.
- Sinclair, T. R., R. M.
Hoffer, and M. M. Schreiber, 1971. Reflectance and internal structure of
leaves from several crops during a growing season. Agronomy Journal, 63,
pp.864-868.
- Su, M.-R., and C.-M. Yang,
1999. Estimation of rice growth from reflectance spectra of vegetative
cover. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 4(3), (in press)
Tucker, C. J., 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations
for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 8, pp.127-150.
- Yang, C.-M., and M.-R. Su,
1997. Analysis of reflectance spectrum of rice canopy. Chinese Journal
of Agrometeorology, 4, pp.87-95.
- Yang, C.-M., and C.-C. Ko,
1998. Seasonal changes in canopy spectra of sweet potato. Journal of
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 3(1), pp.13-28.
- Yang, C.-M., and M.-R. Su,
1998a. Seasonal variations of reflectance spectrum and vegetation index
in rice vegetation cover. In: Proceeding of the 3rd Asian
Crop Science Conference. April 27-May 2, 1998. Chinese Society of
Agronomy. Taichung, Taiwan, pp.574-593.
- Yang, C.-M., and M.-R. Su,
1998b. Correlation of spectral reflectance to growth of rice vegetation.
In: Proceedings of the 19th Asian Conference on Remote
Sensing. November 16-20, 1998. National Mapping and Resource Information
Authority and Asian Association on Remote Sensing. Manila, Philippines,
pp.A-1-1-A-1-6.

Days after transplanting
Figure 1. Seasonal changes in physical growth characters of
leaf area index (LAI), plant height (PH), leaf number (LN), and leaf dry
weight (LDW) of rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Tainung 67) vegetative cover during
the 1st and the 2nd cropping seasons in 1996-1998.

Days after transplanting
Figure 2. Seasonal changes of normalized difference
vegetation index (NDVI) calculated from characteristics wavelengths of rice
reflectance spectra.
|

|
|
NDVI
|
Observed
LAI
|
Figure
3. The exponential relationships between leaf area index (LAI) and
normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the linear correlation
between the predicted values and the observed values of LAI.
|