Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1999


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture/Soil

Water Resources

Disasters

Measurement and Modeling

Land Use

Forest Resources

Mapping from Space

Oceanography/Coastal Zone

Topics Including Education

Hyper Spectral Image Processing

Image Processing

Geology

Environment

GIS

Global Change

Airborne Remote Sensing

Poster Sessions
  • Session 1
  • Session 2
  • Session 3
  • Session 4
  • Session 5
  • Session 6



  • ACRS 1999


    Poster Session 1
    Integrating landscape Models in Forest landscape Analyses using GIS: An Example in Taiwan

    3. Results and discussion
    The landscape patterns of the Liukuei ecosystem management area are shown in Fig.1.


    Fig 1 Landscape structures in 1988 and 1996 under different extents of interference.

    The values of landscape indices under different conditions are compared in Table 1.

    Table 1. Values of landscape indices under different extents of interference
    Yr Landscape index Index value under cumulated effect
    Original Add streams Add roads Add stands
    1988 Number of patches 20 46 68 128
    Mean patch size (ha) 122 53 36 19
    Largest patch index (%) 99 98 28 19
    Total edge (km) 7.1 66.4 136.0 176.4
    Mean shape index 1.40 4.00 4.30 3.16
    1996 Number of patches 29 64 82 159
    Mean patch size (ha) 84 38 30 15
    Largest patch index (%) 99 98 28 20
    Total edge (km) 9.6 69.7 138.2 187.8
    Mean shape index 1.51 3.48 3.87 2.83

    The results indicate that forestation greatly increased the number of patches; streams significantly decreased the mean patch size; and road building affected the largest patch index the most. The total edge increased as the cumulated effect increased, but the effects of streams, road building and forestation did not differ by much. Streams and roads made the patches become irregular in shape. However, because man-made stands tend to be regular in shape, the mean shape indices decreased due to forestation. Comparing the index values in 1988 and 1996 indicates that forestation during the period increased the number of patches, decreased the mean patch size, and slightly increased the length of total edge. The mean shape index also decreased due to regular-shaped forestation. However, because natural forests reclaimed parts of the man-made stands, the largest patch index increased slightly.

    Table 2. The transition matrix and transition probabilities of the observed landscape changes
    Transition from row to column Man-made conifers Man-made hardwoods Mixed forests Natural hardwoods Bare lands Cut areas 1988 total
    Man-made conifers 384.3
    0.841
    3.1
    0.007
    13.6
    0.036
    50.6
    0.111
    5.4
    0.012
    0
    0
    457.0
    1
    Man-made hardwoods 1.5
    0.017
    48.3
    0.563
    1.4
    0.016
    34.6
    0.403
    0
    0
    0
    0
    85.7
    1
    Mixed forest 2.5
    0.121
    0.4
    0.019
    13.4
    0.008
    4.3
    0.208
    0.02
    0.001
    0
    0
    20.6
    1
    Natural hardwoods 35.1
    0.119
    60.9
    0.034
    13.97
    0.008
    1688.0
    0.936
    4.1
    0.002
    1.58
    0.001
    1803.7
    1
    Bare lands 1.0
    0.051
    0
    0
    0
    0
    13.7
    0.727
    4.2
    0.222
    0
    0
    18.9
    1
    Cut areas 12.25
    0.248
    14.65
    0.297
    10.4
    0.211
    11.7
    0.237
    0.4
    0.007
    0
    0
    49.4
    1
    1988 total 436.6 127.4 52.7 1802.9 14.1 1.6 2435.3

    Table 2 shows the Markovian transition matrix and transition probabilities of the observed landscape changes from 1988 to 1996. The landscape was classified into man-made conifers, man-made hardwoods, mixed forests, natural hardwoods, bare lands, and cut areas. The land cover distributions in 1988 and 1996 are summarized in the row and column total, respectively. The most apparent landscape change was the conversion of 95 ha of natural hardwoods into man-made stands. However, about 85 ha of man-made stands were reclaimed by natural hardwoods, too. Mixed forests also increased substantially. Cut areas, on the other hand, decreased dramatically because most of them were wither reforested or taken over by natural hardwoods. In the transition probability matrix, it shows that 11% of man-made conifers, 40% of man-made hardwoods, and 21% of mixed forests became natural hardwoods. Natural hardwoods also substantially reclaimed non-forested land. About 54% of cut areas wee reforested, and 45% of them were taken over by natural hardwoods, leaving less than 1% non-forested.

    Using the land cover distribution in 1996 as the base year, subsequent land cover distributions were projected until the equilibrium condition was reached was reached. Table 3 compares the land cover distributions in 1988, 1996 and under the equilibrium.

    Table 3. Comparisons of land cover distributions
      1988 1996 Equilibrium
    Man-made conifers 457 437 311
    Man-made hardwoods 86 127 155
    Mixed forests 21 53 76
    Natural hardwoods 1806 1803 1882
    Bare lands 19 14 10
    Cut areas 49 2 2
    Total area 2436 2436 2436

    The results suggest that the area of man-made conifers would decrease. However, continuing reforestation would increase the area of man-made hardwoods. The area of mixed forests would maintain at 76 ha. The area of natural hardwoods would increase. Non-forested cut areas would maintain at a very negligible size of 2 ha, and the area of bare lands would decrease. Results of long-term simulation show that it would take approximately 280 years to reach the hypothetical equilibrium.

    Page 3 of 4
    | Previous | Next |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book