Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1999


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture/Soil

Water Resources

Disasters

Measurement and Modeling

Land Use

Forest Resources

Mapping from Space

Oceanography/Coastal Zone

Topics Including Education

Hyper Spectral Image Processing

Image Processing

Geology

Environment

GIS

Global Change

Airborne Remote Sensing

Poster Sessions
  • Session 1
  • Session 2
  • Session 3
  • Session 4
  • Session 5
  • Session 6



  • ACRS 1999


    Poster Session 2
    Estimation of Grass Canopy Height using its BRDF Property

    4. Results
    We did an analysis in accordance with the band of OCTS. In this section, the characteristic of BRDF by the difference of height of grass is shown(Fig3.1 ~ 3.3). Using analyzing data in this section is that I observed in, 17:00 on August 9, 1998 here and we are using the data that I observed in 16:00 on August 19, 1999. Solar Zenith angle is regular almost (about 50 deg.). And measurement area is same area.

    The graph of Fig3.1.3.3 is shown BRDF on principal plane for each band. (wavelength). Vertical axis of the graph is showing reflectance. The horizontal axis is showing scan angle. When scan angle is less than 0, scan is showing backward scan. Drawing of dot is grand truth data. Drawing of line is showing second regression curve. Function of second regression curve is written down under the graph.


    44.5 mm regression curve- - - -y = 1E-05x2 + 0.0009x + 0.1052 R 2 = 0.96924
    72.5 mm regression curve -------y = 8E-06x2 + 0.0005x + 0.0818 R 2 = 0.9032

    Fig. 3.1 Comparison of BRDF for different grass height (OCTS Band 4)




    44.5 mm regression curve- - - -y = 2E-05x2 + 0.0014x + 0.1666 R 2 = 0.974
    72.5 mm regression curve -------y = 7E-06x2 + 0.0009x + 0.1188 R 2 = 0.9779

    Fig. 3.2 Comparison of BRDF for different grass height (OCTS Band 6)




    44.5 mm regression curve- - - y = 4E-05x2 + 0.002x + 0.2658 R 2 = 0.9703
    72.5 mm regression curve -------y = 3E-05x2 + 0.0014x + 0.2726 R 2 = 0.9927

    Fig. 3.3 Comparison of BRDF for different grass height (OCTS Band 4)


    5. Conclusions and Discussion
    We understood the following as a result of processing.
    1. 1.Band4 and Ban6 have most similar characteristics between BRDF and grass canopy height. Smaller height of grass canopy is more large fluctuation of Reflectance for scan angle than taller that.
    2. 2. Band 8 has most interesting characteristics between BRDF and grass canopy height. When scan is backward scan, reflectance of taller height of grass canopy is lager. When reflectance is foreward scan is forward scan, reflectance of smaller height of grass canopy is lager. Therefor grass canopy smaller height has more large fluctuation of Reflectance than smaller that.
    Acknowledgement
    We thank The local government in Mandalgobi, the Meteorological Center in Mandalgobi and The Ministry for Nature and Environment, The Information and Computer Center.

    This work has been supported by CREST (Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology) of Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST).

    Reference
    • Chihiro WATANABE, Yoshiaki HONDA, Koji KAJIWARA The Study of Bi-directional Reflectance Distribution Function(BRDF) for Grassland, ACRS,p-23-1-5,1997
    Page 2 of 2
    | Previous |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book