Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1999


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture/Soil

Water Resources

Disasters

Measurement and Modeling

Land Use

Forest Resources

Mapping from Space

Oceanography/Coastal Zone

Topics Including Education

Hyper Spectral Image Processing

Image Processing

Geology

Environment

GIS

Global Change

Airborne Remote Sensing

Poster Sessions
  • Session 1
  • Session 2
  • Session 3
  • Session 4
  • Session 5
  • Session 6



  • ACRS 1999


    Poster Session 3

    Printer Friendly Format

    Page 1 of 3
    | Next |

    Use of GIS for the Method of Urban Safety Analysis and Environmental Design

    Osamu Murao and Fumio Yamazaki
    Institute of Industrial Science
    University of Tokyo
    4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8505, JAPAN
    Tel: (81)-3-5452-6388, Fax: (81)-3-5452-6389
    E-Mail:murao@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp

    Keywords: Urban Safety, GIS, Image of the City, Environmental Design, Disaster

    Abstract
    In Japan, where earthquakes occur frequently, it is important to carry out urban planning considering natural disasters. However, it appears that Japanese cities have not been designed with any definite visions of urban safety based on previous research concerning natural disasters in Japan, except for a few cases. It is necessary for people in Japan, which has been plagued with many earthquakes throughout history, to propose a future vision of a city from the viewpoint of urban safety. On the other hand, recent computer technology enabled the improvement of real-time monitoring systems after the 1994 Northledge Earthquake and the 1995 Kobe Earthquake. In this paper a method of analyzing and designing a city, based on the viewpoint of urban safety, is proposed. This method, named MUSE (Method of Urban Safety Analysis and Environmental Design), is based on the theory of The Image of the City by Lynch (1961), and some urban physical elements are defined as parts of an organic system. Using the MUSE with Arc/View 3D analyst, we can easily and visually simulate the city as a three-dimensional world, a task which previously required much time to express by models, on a monitor. The authors constructed vulnerability functions (Murao and Yamazaki, 1999) and proposed the Method for Building Collapse Risk Assessment (Murao and Yamazaki, 2000). Applying these methods of urban safety assessments to the MUSE should make it useful for early damage assessment systems. Moreover, by combining it with recent technology the MUSE will be realized for urban safety in the future.

    1. Introduction
    In Japan, where earthquakes occur frequently, it is important to carry out urban planning considering natural disasters. However, it appears that Japanese cities have not been designed with any definite visions of urban safety based on previous research concerning natural disasters in Japan, except for a few cases. It is necessary for people in Japan, which has been plagued with many earthquakes throughout history, to propose a future vision of a city from the viewpoint of urban safety. The proposed vision must also be useful for other countries in which earthquakes often occur. On the other hand, the recent computer technology enabled the improvement of real-time monitoring systems after the 1994 Northledge Earthquake and the 1995 Kobe Earthquake. Using future technology, it will become possible to easily simulate urban visions according to various situations. The authors constructed vulnerability functions for buildings based on actual damage data of the 1995 Kobe Earthquake (Murao and Yamazaki, 1999) and proposed the Method for Building Collapse Risk Assessment (Murao et al., 1999, Murao and Yamazaki, 2000). The use of future technology and the proposed method of urban safety assessment should be useful for early damage assessment systems. This paper focuses on urban physical environments, and we propose a method named MUSE (the Method of Urban Safety Analysis and Environmental Design) to analyze a city from the viewpoints of urban safety.

    2. Image of a City
    It might be difficult for us to recognize differences among cities with physical elements. Lynch (1960) proposed the method called “The Image of the City” to consider the differences between Boston, Jersey City and Los Angeles. In his theory, Lynch classified physical elements of cities into five types and analyzed the cities using the idea called imagability, as shown in Figure 1. These five types of elements which were “paths”, linear elements on which people can pass, such as like streets; “edges”, other linear elements which people cannot cross, like coasts; “districts”, areas that people recognize to be identical; and “nodes”, important intersections and symbolized “landmarks” in the city. The proposed method was an experimental attempt to analyze cities visually using urban physical elements.

    3. Method of Urban Safety Analysis and Environmental Design

    3.1 City as an organic system

    After World War II, large-scale development for new towns was carried out worldwide. In those days, some new methods for designing cities were considered by many architects to deal with the social situation. Tange (1961) in Tokyo Project 1960 and Smithon and Smithon (1967) in Urban Structuring tried to design cities in analogy to living organisms (structure of human body, trunks or leaves of trees, etc.), as shown in Figure 2. These theories or an organic city can be applied for urban safety planning. Referring to The Image of the City” by Lynch (1960) and considering the city to be an organic system, the MUSE is proposed.

    (a) Boston (b) Los Angeles
    Figure 1 Images of cities by Lynch (1960)

    Opened System and Closed System Axis of Possibility for Urban Development
    (a) Tokyo 1960 by Tange (1961) (b) Cluster City by Smithon and Smithon (1967)
    Figure 2 City as an organic system

    Page 1 of 3
    | Next |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book