Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1999


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture/Soil

Water Resources

Disasters

Measurement and Modeling

Land Use

Forest Resources

Mapping from Space

Oceanography/Coastal Zone

Topics Including Education

Hyper Spectral Image Processing

Image Processing

Geology

Environment

GIS

Global Change

Airborne Remote Sensing

Poster Sessions
  • Session 1
  • Session 2
  • Session 3
  • Session 4
  • Session 5
  • Session 6



  • ACRS 1999


    Poster Session 6

    Printer Friendly Format

    Page 1 of 2
    | Next |

    Flood detection using multitemporal Radarsat and ERS SAR data

    Ping Chen, Soo Chin Liew and Hock Lim
    Centre for Remote Imaging, Sensing and Processing,
    National University of Singapore,
    Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119260
    Tel: (65) 8748029, Fax: (65) 7757717,
    E-mail: crschenp@nus.edu.sg

    Keywords: flood, ERS SAR, RADARSAT SAR, multi-temporal images

    Abstract
    A study using combined RADARSAT and ERS SAR images in flood detection is described in this paper. The availability of SAR data from the RADARSAT and ERS satellites offers an opportunity for continuous observation of flood events. This makes it possible to monitor the progress of flood in near real time and to produce accurate, rapid and cost effective flooding maps. The objective of this study is to monitor flood by using multitemporal and multiplatform SAR data. Eight RADARSAT (standard mode S6, S4 and S1), five ERS PRI SAR and five SPOT multispectral optical images were used in this study. The images were acquired over the Mekong delta in Vietnam from June 1997 to Dec 1997. The SAR images were first filtered, co-registered and calibrated. Then the inundated areas were extracted from the SAR images by using thresholding methods. The majority filter was used for post processing of the flooding maps. The results were compared and evaluated with SPOT multispectral images serving as the "ground truth". The characteristics of RADARSAT and ERS data for flood detection and the determination of threshold value are discussed. In this paper, we present the time series of flooding maps in 1997. The result of this study verified the effectiveness of the SAR data for flood monitoring.

    Introduction
    Although the Mekong Delta’s area occupies only 5% of the entire watershed of the Mekong River, it collects all the water from the Mekong River, one of the big river systems in Asia. Floods are almost annual events in the Delta. The floods usually occur during the rainy season from May to December and culminate around October and November. Remote sensing provides an effective means of obtaining a synoptic view of areas affected by floods for monitoring the progress of a flooding event. Multitemporal optical images such as the SPOT images would be able to detect flooded areas. However, the use of optical imagery is often hampered by the presence of cloud covers during the flood seasons. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery acquired by the RADARSAT and ERS satellites can be used for flood monitoring due to the cloud penetrating capability of SAR. Therefore, the use of SAR imagery acquired at appropriate time would greatly help in the compilation and timely updating of flooding maps.

    A flood map of the Mekong Delta during a single date in 1996 was composed using a RADARSAT Scan SAR imagery (Lai, 1998). In this study, we monitor the flood of 1997 in the Mekong Delta by using multitemporal and multiplatform SAR data with high time and spatial resolution. As the RADARSAT and ERS SAR have different characteristics, it is necessary to evaluate the performance of these data for flood detection.

    Study Area and Available Data
    The study area is an area about 100 km by 91 km located in the Mekong River Delta. The location of the study area is shown in Figure 1. The data set consists of eight RADARSAT (standard mode S1, S4 and S6) images, five descending mode ERS-2 PRI images and five SPOT multispectral images which were acquired from June 1997 to Dec 1997. The acquisition dates of imagery used for this study are listed in Table 1.

    The SAR images of the RADARSAT and ERS were used for the flood detection, while the SPOT images were used to evaluate the results. As the SPOT data were acquired in almost same period as that of SAR data it offers a high degree of reliability for checking the results.


    Fig. 1: Location map of the Study Area


    Table 1: The data used in this study
    Date ERSRADARSATSPOT
    Jun 29Ö 
    Jul 26  S6 
    Jul 29  S1 
    Aug 3Ö  
    Sep 6  Ö
    Sep 7Ö  
    Sep 28  S1 
    Oct 8  S4 
    Nov 16 Ö  
    Nov 17  Ö
    Nov 23  S6Ö
    Nov 26 S1 Ö
    Dec 10  S4 
    Dec 19  Ö
    Dec 20  S1 
    Dec 21Ö  

    Data Processing Method
    The calibrated SAR Precision Image (PRI) products of ERS and RADARSAT were used in this study. The images were acquired and processed at the ground station of the Centre for Remote Imaging, Sensing and Processing (CRISP), Singapore. Each image was first low-pass filtered using a 5 × 5 averaging window and then downsampled to a pixel size of 50m × 50m. All the images were co-registered and calibrated. An edge-preserving speckle removal filter based on the adaptive Wiener filter for multiplicative noise was applied afterwards.

    The SAR backscattering coefficient (s ° ) in dB was computed from the RADARSAT and ERS SAR images using the equation

    where DN is the digital pixel number, K is a calibration constant and q is the incidence angle.


    For RADARSAT scenes processed at CRISP, the calibration constant K has the same value for all pixels within the same image.

    The inundated areas were extracted using the threshold method, and the threshold conditions were set as follows:
    • For RADARSAT images,s °I£ TR where,s°I is backscattering coefficient of the image and TR is the threshold value.
    • For ERS images, s°d/s°b£ T AND s°b£TE where,s °d and s°b are the SAR backscattering coefficient in dB for the data during flood and before flood respectively.
    • The values of TR and TE were determined from the mean of the selected AOI (area of interested) or the histograms of the data. The images were post processed with 3 by 3 majority filter after flood detection.
    Page 1 of 2
    | Next |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book