Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1999


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture/Soil

Water Resources

Disasters

Measurement and Modeling

Land Use

Forest Resources

Mapping from Space

Oceanography/Coastal Zone

Topics Including Education

Hyper Spectral Image Processing

Image Processing

Geology

Environment

GIS

Global Change

Airborne Remote Sensing

Poster Sessions
  • Session 1
  • Session 2
  • Session 3
  • Session 4
  • Session 5
  • Session 6



  • ACRS 1999


    GIS

    Printer Friendly Format

    Page 1 of 3
    | Next |

    A Study on Determination of Proper Service Level of National Spatial Data Infrastructure Using Activity-Based Approach

    Konami Takahiro, Shibasaki Ryosuke, Sakakibara Tsuneki
    Center for spatial information science, University of Tokyo, JAPAN


    Keywords: Spatial Data Infrastructure

    Abstract
    With increasing demands for integrated spatial data set by various fields of business, several countries have proceeded their plans for the public sectors to develop such basic spatial databases. It is crucially important to clarify the benefit and appropriate role of the governmental investment. The final purpose of this study is to establish a methodological framework to find proper investment level of national spatial databases. To achieve this, the author proposes a method based on the estimation of economical benefits of spatial data infrastructure and act analysis of spatial data production.

    1. Introduction
    With rapid increase of information technology, an importance of information-related national infrastructure (Information Infrastructure) is growing rapidly in these days. Information infrastructure consists of both hardware-related infrastructures –– such as glass fiber network or earth stations of satellite networks–– and, software-related infrastructures.

    There are two kinds of software-related information infrastructures; one is strategic standardization of data and services, while another is a development of database itself as a national data infrastructure. When developing such information infrastructure, there are many cases which require some assistance of governmental sector like conventional physical infrastructures; highways, sewers, railways, etc... And, it is essential to estimate social benefit of such infrastructures to confirm an efficiency of projects.

    In this research, the authors focus on national data infrastructures as a common datasets or databases created by a governmental sector. Among several data infrastructure like patent database, law database, or other national databases, this paper is focusing on national spatial database, which includes map-related information like roads, houses and so on.

    The final purpose of this research is to establish a methodological framework determine appropriate service level and proper developing procedures of national spatial databases. In this paper, the authors focus to develop a method to estimate proper service level of national spatial databases.

    2. Objectives of This Research

    2.1. Social Requirements

    In Japan, there is a project named National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) which is initiated mainly by the National Land Agency.

    Typical purposes of developing common database of spatial information are as followings.
    • To avoid redundant investment in different databases with same data.
    • To induce competition by decreasing entrance cost of the market
    • To accelerate reusing datasets by developing one standard of spatial data –– price of datasets using multiple data sources will decrease ––
    In this project, the investment will be provided mainly by public sectors who have abilities of creating spatial databases. Generally, for such public databases, the price will be held cheaper because there should be many users, compared to pure private projects.

    However, some problems with NSDI project are not solved yet precisely. For example; what kinds of data should be included? How to prioritize datasets to be included? How accurate those data should be? How much money can be spent for the project? Who should be responsible for the development of whole detaset?...etc...

    These problems are caused by the fact that techniques or researches of clarifying amounts and objects of social benefits has not yet been systematically.

    2.2. Objectives of this research
    In this paper, the purpose is to develop a method to clarify (1) how much investment should be done, and (2) what kind of data should be included, for national spatial data infrastructures.

    3. Abstract of the Method
    With proposed method, economical benefits of spatial data infrastructure is estimated by developing a model of spatial data market. With the market model, we can formulate spatial data suppliers' profit and consumers' benefit when some data infrastructure has been developed. As a result, we can estimate economical benefits due to development of spatial data infrastructure.

    There are two essential sub models in the market model. One is a demand sub model and another is a cost sub model. In this research, the author also mentions about how to create these two sub models.

    3.1. Outline of Demand Model Development
    At first, we develop a model which represents demands for spatial data. A method for the model development aggregates for information (includes information without any spatial element) through all activities of the whole business. This process consists of the steps as shown below.
    1. Construct a model representing information usages of business procedures
    2. Pick up demands for spatial information among all requirements for information derived from step (1)
    3. Survey detailed requirements for spatial data : quality and required data items
    4. Survey maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for a spatial database
    5. Survey elasticity of WTP with quality of the data
    3.2. Outline of Cost Model Development
    Cost structure depends who or which institutions develop database. In this research, however, the authors ignore the difference in development cost of database among different institutions, as long as the database has the same quality. Thus, to create cost model of data infrastructure, the author extrapolates the cost model representing cost structures of existing private spatial data companies. Costs of each company will be collected by interviewing to each company or by survey using some questionnaire sheets.

    Page 1 of 3
    | Next |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book