Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 1999


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture/Soil

Water Resources

Disasters

Measurement and Modeling

Land Use

Forest Resources

Mapping from Space

Oceanography/Coastal Zone

Topics Including Education

Hyper Spectral Image Processing

Image Processing

Geology

Environment

GIS

Global Change

Airborne Remote Sensing

Poster Sessions
  • Session 1
  • Session 2
  • Session 3
  • Session 4
  • Session 5
  • Session 6



  • ACRS 1999


    Water Resources

    Printer Friendly Format

    Page 1 of 3
    | Next |

    Assessment of Climate-Change Impact on Runoff Using Normalized Difference Vegetation Index

    Chi-Chung Lau 1 , Kwan-Tun Lee 2 , Ching-Pin Tung 3 , Chin-Hsin Chang 2
    1 :Laboratories of Energy and Resources, Industrial Technology Research Institute,
    Bldg.24, 195-6, Sec.4, Chunghsin Rd., Chutung 310, Taiwan
    Tel. (886)-3-591-5469 Fax.(886)-3-582-0038
    E-mail: cclau@erl.itri.org.tw
    2 National Ocean University , 3 National Taiwan University

    Abstract
    Climate-change influences rainfall-runoff process by changing weather input and basin's characteristics. This study uses remote sensing based vegetation index (NDVI) to evaluate the change of vegetation under 1xCO2 and 2xCO2 conditions. Some studies shown that vegetation belt shifts up with temperature on a rate of +180m/1°C. NDVI distribution curve simulates this shift of vegetation, and then calculates new evapotranspiration parameter of a rainfall-runoff model. CCCM, a general circulation model of NCAR, provides monthly precipitation and temperature on 2xCO2 conditions, and daily data were generated with a first-order Markov chain model. Four basins located on difference water resource regions are processed to calculate flow duration curves (FDC). FDC result indicates that four basins have higher flood flow. Northern and eastern regions have smaller flow rate during drought period but the other two regions have larger values. Mean flow rate (Q50) on southern region in 2xCO2 is five times then that in 1xCO2 condition.

    Introduction

    Basin-scale Modeling
    Many satellite remote sensing programs have been launched for studying atmospheric vapor and their land surface relationship. General procedure is developing a series of algorithms that integrate data from remote sensing for simulating Water-Energy-Carbon, Carbon and Biogeochemistry. On the other hand, General Circulation Model (GCM) provides global scale solution of precipitation and temperature while carbo-dioxide concentration rises. Many GCMs have concluded that more precipitation falling in high latitude area and causing more runoff. In low latitude area, runoff is decreased due to less rainfall and higher temperature. Simultaneously increasing precipitation and temperature makes more flood and drought problems. However, water resource engineers do not satisfy the answer because the broad scale is non-suitable for operation purpose. What the engineers needed is a “basin-scale” result. This study present a short cut that develops a basin-scale model simulating runoff under 2xCO2 condition by combining GCM output and remote sensing data.

    Study method
    Study procedure is arranged as Fig.1:
    • Developing a hydrologic model that has hydrologic meaning parameters.
    • Estimating the relationship between parameter and physiographic factor, remote sensing helps to represent the vegetation condition of watershed and to bridge parameter and climate change.
    • Generating daily rainfall and temperature data from GCM’s monthly output.
    • Estimating new vegetation pattern from GCM output on 2xCO2 condition, and new model parameter from vegetation-parameter relationship.
    • Combining the results of step 3 and step 4 to simulate runoff and follow up assessment.


    Fig 1. Study Flow Chart

    Hydrologic Model

    Model Structure
    We develop a simplified SWM (Lau, 1996) which has three storage layers simulating fast response (Fig.2), slow response, and ground water of a watershed. Model detail has described in original paper and briefly express as following:



    Fig 2.Structure of Hydrologic Model

    Fast Response Zone The zone simulates basin’s top depress and top soil layer. While precipitation (P) fall, water stay in the zone that is called Fast Response Zone Storage (FRS). Flow can be represented as:

    FRS(t)=P(t)+FRS(t-1)-F(t-1)-SR(t-1)-FET(t-1)………………(1)

    In eq. 1, t stands for time period. Surface runoff, SR, is calculated by Manning’s equation controlled by a roughness and slope parameter GEO. FET is assumed a free evaporation that estimated by smaller value between potential evapotranspiration (PET) and FRS. PET can be calculated with Blaney Criddle (1958) method by given average temperature.

    Slow Response Zone
    Slow response zone emulates lower soil zone. Moisture in the zone is called Slow Response Zone Storage (SRS) that can be formulated as:

    SRS(t)= F(t)+SRS(t-1) -QI(t-1)-DP(t-1)-SET(t-1)………………(2)

    F is decided by infiltration coefficient A, SRC and water content SRS. QI is calculated by interflow recession constant,KI. SET is determined by a vegetation related coefficient CET and water content SRS. DP is just decided by the ration of water content and zone’s capacity (SRC)s

    Ground Water Zone
    Ground Water zone Storage (GWS) receives deep percolation (DP) and outlet ground water (QG):

    GWS(t)= DP(t)+GWS(t-1) -QG(t-1)……………………………(3)

    Estimation of ground water is from recession constant (KG):

    QG(t)=(1-KG) GWS(t)…………………………………………(4)

    Outlet discharge from basin is the total of SR, QI and QG. There are total five parameters (Table 1) needed to calibrate by fitting estimated and historical discharge, and two recession constants are estimated by recession section of hydrographies. To study correlation between physiographic factor and parameters, remotely sensed data transfer two indexes: vegetation and soil index that makes it possible to bridge parameter and physiographic factor.

    Page 1 of 3
    | Next |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book