Backscattering Characteristics of Airborne SAR Images for Seismic
Vulnerability Assessment in Urban Areas
In Fig.4 (a) and Fig.5 (a), the cross-polarized intensity of Max(R
hh) is very low
compared with the co-polarization intensity. As expected, Max(R
hh) exhibited co- and
cross-polarized signature shapes similar to those of the simple backscattering model from an
object with a horizontal component. Hence, it is assumed that the area near Max(R
hh) must be
the scattering object to the radar illumination direction. Therefore, it is suggested that the
area is a residential one where buildings are horizontal with respect to the radar illumination
direction. In Fig.4 (b) and Fig.5 (b), the entire polarized intensity of Max(R
vh) is very low
compared with those of Max(R
hh) and Max(R
vv). Max(R
vh) exhibited co- and cross-polarized
signature shapes similar to those of the simple backscattering model from an object with a 45
degree inclined corner reflector component. In Fig.4 (c) and Fig.5 (c), Max(R
vv) exhibited
co- and cross-polarized signature shapes similar to those of the simple backscattering model
from an object with a vertical component. Since the R
vv value is high for tall buildings in
commercial areas, it is suggested that VV polarization intensity has a relation with the
building height.
Fig.4 Relationship between HH, VH, and VV polarization intensities for selected areas and
maximum received intensities which are computed from co- and cross-polarizations
| Co-polarization | Cross-polarization |
|
| (a) Max(Rhh) area |
|
 |
| (b) Max(Rvh) area |
|
 |
| (c) Max(Rvv) area |
| Fig.5 Co- and cross-polarization signatures for three areas |
Comparison with Field Survey and Aerial Photographs
The characteristics of the building in each area extracted from Fig.3 were confirmed
by the results of the field survey, and those of surrounding structures in urban areas were
confirmed based on aerial photographs. The field survey was carried out in August 1999. The
aerial photographs were mostly taken with SAR images at the same acquisitions
(October-November, 1997). The actual structure at the Max(R
hh) area was found to be a
wooden house with is a large wall almost horizontal to the radar illumination direction due to
the field survey results. The surroundings were confirmed to be a highly dense residential
district by the aerial photographs (Fig.6 (a)). The actual structure at the area of Max(R
vh) was
confirmed to be a low-rise building built at a 45 degree inclination to the radar illumination
direction based on the field survey results. It is confirmed from the aerial photograph that this
area is a residential district of similar environment to that of the area with Max(R
vh) (Fig.6
(b)). The actual structure in the area Max(R
vv) is a tall and slender high-rise building
compared with the surrounding buildings. On the basis of the aerial photograph (Fig.6 (c)), it
is confirmed that this area is commercial district unique to metropolises.
 |
|
(a) Area A around Max(Rhh) |
|
 |  |
| (b) Area B around Max(Rvh) | (c) Area C around
Max(Rvv)
|
Fig.6 Aerial photographs of the surroundings of selected areas
(© Nakanihon Air Service Co., Ltd.)
Conclusion
In this paper the relationship between the structure of urban areas and the
backscattering characteristics was discussed using airborne SAR full-polarized images taken
in the Tokyo Metropolitan area. As a result, it was suggested that the predominant
polarization intensity differed with the height, form, and alignment direction of the buildings.
Future study will be carried out to investigate the potential of polarimetric characteristics
from airborne SAR for the evaluation of the seismic vulnerability of structures in urban
areas.
References
-
Communications Research Laboratory, and National Space Development Agency of
Japan (1998). CRL/NASDA Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar.
-
Yamaguchi, Y. (1998), Fundamentals of Polarimetric Radar and its Applications,
Realize Inc (in Japanese).
-
Van Zyl, J.J., H.A. Zebker, and C. Elachi (1987), Imaging Radar Polarization
Signatures: Theory and Observation, Radio Science, 22(4), pp.529-543. Radar illumination direction
-
Zebker, H.A., J.J. Van Zyl, and D.N. Held (1987), Imaging Radar Polarimeter from
Wave Synthesis, Journal of Geophysical Research, 92(B1), pp.638-701.