Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 2000


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture & Soil

Water Resources

Coastal Zone Monitoring

Digital Photogrammetry

Environment

Forest Resources

GIS & Data Integration

Hazard Mitigation

Image Processing

Educational & Profession

Global Change

Landuse

Mapping from Space & GPS

SAR/InSAR

Oceanography

Hyperspectral & Data Acquisition System

AirSAR/MASTER

Poster Sessions
  • Session 1
  • Session 2
  • Session 3



  • ACRS 2000


    Poster Session 3
    Approach to Land-use Analysis in Hetao Irrigation Project of Inner Mongolia, China, Based on Satellite Image Data

    Results and Discussion
    Figs. 5 to 7 show the results of the supervised classifications 1 and 2 and unsupervised classification mentioned previously. Table 2 shows the areas (ha) of the respective classes in the results of classification in Figs. 5 to 7. Here, we discuss the most-likely classification method applied generally. In the area of about 247,000 ha in Linhe, 8,556 ha (3.46%) were classified into dune and 96,532 ha (39.1%) were classified into the saline soil; the area amounting to 42.56% is the land of dunes and saline soils not covered with vegetation.



    Fig5 Supervised classisification1



    Fig6 Supervised classisification2



    Fig7 Unsupervised classification

    Table2 Result of classification

    MethodSand duneSaline soilVegetationWaterUrbanOthersTotal
     (ha)(ha)(ha)(ha)(ha)(ha)(ha)
    Supervised classification 185569653211196713763300913135246963
    Supervised classification 272189715811188413600364213460246963
    Unsupervised classification1445892745989868135266026037246963

    Figs. 8 and 9 show the areas coinciding to both the result of extraction of dunes and the result of extraction of dunes and saline soils (including naked soils) from Figs. 5 and 6. Table 3 shows the results. Comparison of Tables 2 and 3 reveals decreases in dunes and saline soils. These are the results of extracting the areas common to Figs. 5 and 6.

    Page 3 of 4
    | Previous | Next |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book