Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 2000


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture & Soil

Water Resources

Coastal Zone Monitoring

Digital Photogrammetry

Environment

Forest Resources

GIS & Data Integration

Hazard Mitigation

Image Processing

Educational & Profession

Global Change

Landuse

Mapping from Space & GPS

SAR/InSAR

Oceanography

Hyperspectral & Data Acquisition System

AirSAR/MASTER

Poster Sessions
  • Session 1
  • Session 2
  • Session 3



  • ACRS 2000


    Poster Session 3

    Printer Friendly Format

    Page 1 of 3
    | Next |

    Prospect for the Method of Urban Safety Analysis and Environmental Design

    Osamu Murao and Fumio Yamazaki
    Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo
    4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8505
    Tel: (81)-3-5452-6388, Fax: (81)-3-5452-6389
    E-mail: murao@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp
    JAPAN

    Keywords: Information Technology, GIS, Digital City, Urban Simulation, Urban Safety Planning

    Abstract
    In Japan, it is important to carry out urban planning considering natural disasters, because earthquakes occur frequently. However, except for few cases, cities in Japan have not been designed with any definite visions for urban safety based on previous research concerning natural disasters. It is necessary for the people in Japan to propose a future vision of a city from the urban safety point of view, as it has been plagued with many earthquakes throughout history. On the other hand, recent information technology enabled the improvement of real-time monitoring systems after the 1994 Northridge Earthquake and the 1995 Kobe Earthquake. The authors proposed a method of analyzing and designing a city based on the urban safety point of view in previous papers. This method, named as MUSE (the Method of Urban Safety Analysis and Environmental Design), is based on the theory of The Image of the City by Lynch (1961), and some urban physical elements are defined as parts of an organic system. In this paper the prospect for MUSE and the methodology to realize it are described. The proposed system is related to Information Technologies and we expect that MUSE will be applied to early earthquake damage assessment systems.

    Introduction
    Recent rapid development of information technologies, i.e., Internet, Mobile Computing, Remote Sensing, Virtual Reality, etc., have changed our social life in various fields. This remarkable innovation also affects the field of urban safety planning or disaster mitigation. Cooperating with these latest information technologies, some human activities for disaster mitigation could be shifted into a new paradigm. Especially, GIS technology will be an effective means, because the spatial viewpoint is indispensable not only for the field of physical environment like urban planning but also for human activities. In fact, a lot of researches with GIS have been carried out since the 1994 Northridge Earthquake and the standardization of spatial data infrastructure as ISO/TC211 is globally under development. In the field of architectural design, some architects (e.g., Frazer, 1995) have discussed new possibility of Cyber City or Cyber Architecture. However, the expected new concept of cyberspace might be only artistic expression on the monitor without awareness of urban problems in the real world. Linking the real world and the cyberspace together to solve the concrete urban problem, the new life style in the IT era will be realized. Based on the above social background and the previous research (e.g. Murao et al., 2000), the present authors proposed a method named MUSE (the Method of Urban Safety Analysis and Environmental Design) to analyze a city from the viewpoint of urban safety (Murao and Yamazaki, 1999). This paper focuses on the prospect to realize MUSE.

    Outline of "MUSE "
    MUSE (the Method of Urban Safety Analysis and Environmental Design) is based on the theory of The Image of the City by Lynch (1961), and some urban physical elements are defined as parts of an organic system in GIS. This is a method to analyze or recognize urban phenomena. It will be able to simulate and design cities optimally according to each condition. The physical elements are classified into the following 10 types.

    Element-0: Imaginary Walls
    Element-I: Subjects (as Physical Dynamic Elements): people, bicycles, cars, trains, etc.
    Element-II: Shapes (as Physical Static Elements)
    a. Paths (Leading Paths and Secondary Paths): streets, expressways, alleys, railways, etc.
    b. Edges: coastlines, riverbanks, long walls, edges of developed districts, etc.
    c. Cells: town blocks, etc.
    d. Voids: open spaces, public squares, parks, playgrounds, campuses, parking lots, etc.
    e. Cores: city halls, ward offices, elementary schools, hospitals, etc.
    Element-III: Webs (as Systematic Elements): common ducts, lifelines, water supply, etc.
    Element-IV: Nature (as Natural Elements): ponds, lakes, rivers, green belts, farms, etc.
    With the classified spatial data for GIS, inventory and statistical data, and the latest information technologies (e.g., high quality computers, GPS, Remote Sensing, Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Ubiquitous Computing, Cyber Architecture, etc.), we hope to have remarkable improvement in the field of disaster mitigation (Figure 1).



    Figure 1 Cooperation between Information Technologies and MUSE

    Page 1 of 3
    | Next |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book