Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 2000


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture & Soil

Water Resources

Coastal Zone Monitoring

Digital Photogrammetry

Environment

Forest Resources

GIS & Data Integration

Hazard Mitigation

Image Processing

Educational & Profession

Global Change

Landuse

Mapping from Space & GPS

SAR/InSAR

Oceanography

Hyperspectral & Data Acquisition System

AirSAR/MASTER

Poster Sessions
  • Session 1
  • Session 2
  • Session 3



  • ACRS 2000


    Mapping from Space & GPS
    Performance Evaluation Of Rtk Gps Without Sa Effect

    Table 4 Statistical Analysis of Baseline Length

    Baseline
    Static GPS (m)
    RTK GPS (m)
    Deviation (m)
    B013-B032
    154.606
    154.674
    0.067
    B032-B034
    194.390
    194.683
    0.294
    B034-B035
    207.985
    208.076
    0.091
    B035-BL01
    280.206
    279.609
    -0.597
    BL01-C026
    328.431
    328.428
    -0.003
    C026-C027
    144.843
    144.857
    0.014
    C027-C031
    189.289
    189.307
    0.018
    C027-B034
    210.626
    210.691
    0.064
    Max
     
    0.294
    Min
     
    -0.597
    Mean
     
    -0.007
    RMS
     
    0.196


    5.2 RTK GPS without SA
    After SA was turned off, the static and RTK GPS re-occupied the experimental network. Through the similar baseline processing and network adjustment, the outcomes of static GPS are still contemplated as the reference standard to judge the performance of RTK GPS without SA effect. The statistical analysis of TM 2° coordinates is listed in Table 4 that the deviation is less than 1cm in east and north directions and below 3cm in height, so the reliability of RTK GPS without SA is meaningful. At that time, the comparison task of RTK GPS with and without SA carried out and the estimated result is displayed in Table 6 that the discrepancy is below 3cm in east and north directions and about 10cm in height. It is compassion that only three points could evolve in the comparison because of satellite constellation and station surroundings.

    Table 5 Statistical Analysis of TM 2° Coordinates

    Point
    E (cm)
    N (cm)
    H (cm)
    Max
    1.3
    1.5
    4.5
    Min
    -1.6
    -2.2
    -10.9
    Mean
    -0.13
    0.04
    -2.90
    RMS
    0.50
    0.79
    3.59


    Table 6 Comparison of RTK GPS with and without SA

    Point
    DE (m)
    DN (m)
    DH (m)
    B032
    0.031
    0.038
    -0.125
    BL01
    -0.012
    0.062
    -0.144
    C027
    -0.027
    0.047
    -0.163


    6. Conclusions
    According to the preliminary analysis on horizontal vector, vertical vector and baseline length, the RTK GPS does denote to have the capability of static GPS technique in positioning. In other words, the RTK GPS technique is feasible, effective, and efficient for positioning and other applications, but the stableness is the most concern issue. Obviously, the reliability of RTK GPS could reach the centimeter level that is very near the order of static GPS, but the RTK GPS affected by SA on or off is also limited in centimeter level. The major difficulty of RTK GPS is the obstruction around station and the capability of radio power.

    7. References
    • Abidin, H.A., 1994. On-the-Fly Ambiguity Resolution. GPS World, No. 4, pp. 47-56.
    • Kaplan, E.D., 1996. Understanding GPS Principles and Applications. Artech House, New York.
    • Langley, R.B., 1998. RTK GPS. GPS World, No. 9, pp. 70-76.
    • Leick, A., 1996. GPS Satellite Surveying. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. pp. 317-409.
    • Teunissen, P.J.G., 1998. GPS for Geodesy. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 271-318.
    Page 3 of 3
    | Previous |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book