Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 2000


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture & Soil

Water Resources

Coastal Zone Monitoring

Digital Photogrammetry

Environment

Forest Resources

GIS & Data Integration

Hazard Mitigation

Image Processing

Educational & Profession

Global Change

Landuse

Mapping from Space & GPS

SAR/InSAR

Oceanography

Hyperspectral & Data Acquisition System

AirSAR/MASTER

Poster Sessions
  • Session 1
  • Session 2
  • Session 3



  • ACRS 2000


    Hyperspectral & Data Acquisition Systems
    Vegetation Spectral Feature Extraction Model

    Table 2 lists correlation matrix of 8 feature positions , from Table 2 , we can get priority order for 8 feature positions : first , select two positions with minimum correlation coefficient (absolute value) , remove these two bands and those bands with highest correlation coefficient with them , then , select repeatedly for the rest bands until we get to band number we predetermine.

    Table 2 correlation coefficient of 8 feature positions (bands)

    Corres
    ponding feature position
    M B G Y R V I1 I
    Wave
    length(nm)
    404.7 522.4 544.7 573.4 673.1 723.4 759.0 890.1
    404.7 0.8890 0.8952 0.8372 0.4575 0.8408 0.6561 0.6117
    522.4 0.8890 0.9895 0.9925 0.7071 0.8265 0.5520 0.5185
    544.7 0.8952 0.9895 0.9812 0.6161 0.8785 0.6364 0.6035
    573.4 0.8372 0.9925 0.9812 0.7455 0.7960 0.5053 0.4758
    673.1 0.4575 0.7071 0.6161 0.7455 0.3313 -0.0230 -0.0366
    723.4 0.8408 0.8265 0.8785 0.7960 0.3313 0.9020 0.8806
    759.0 0.6561 0.5520 0.6364 0.5053 -0.0230 0.9020 0.9947
    890.1 0.6117 0.5185 0.6035 0.4758 -0.0366 0.8806 0.9947


    Fig. 2 The simulated images of the correlation coefficient matrix among 187 bands(400-950nm) of Se590



    from Table 2 , we can get priority order for 8 feature positions : first , select two positions with minimum correlation coefficient (absolute value) , remove these two bands and those bands with highest correlation coefficient with them , then , select repeatedly for the rest bands until we get to band number we predetermine.

    4. Conclusion
    According to above analysis , we find out that:
    1. Through lots of analysis on field vegetation spectral data, A new spectral feature selection and extraction model(for vegetation only!)--- Vegetation Spectral Feature Extraction Model (VSFEM) is presented , with which 8 spectral feature positions are suggested to control vegetation spectral curves . Those feature positions are 404(M), 525(B), 556(G),573(Y),671(R),723(V),758(I1),900nm(I) .
    2. It is reasonable to select feature positions as best bands. However, the feature positions and bandwidths for different feature are not the same. As a result, the accurate positions of G, R, M, I are not necessary. They should change in a proper range, such as I and M which could use a broader band.
    3. According to the correlationship among bands, the bands could be removed are: I, M, B, Y and G. As for band R ¢ V ¢ I1, they should not be removed . If subdivision allowed , it's proper to subdivide red edge(R-V-I1 ) , moreover , we can subdivide around B and Y position .
    Anyway , above results are acquired through spectral data by Se590 and some other conditions , we cannot reject absolutely new results under higher spectral resolution and other conditions .

    References
    1. Boardman, J. W., and Kruse, F. A., 1994,"Automated spectral analysis: a geological example using AVIRIS data, north Grapevine Mountains, Nevada.", Proceedings, ERIM Tenth Thematic Conference on Geologic Remote Sensing, Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, p. I-407 - I-418.
    2. Fukunaga,K., Koontz,W.L.G., 1970, "Application of the Karhunen_Loeve expansion to feature selection and ordering." , IEEE Trans. Comput., Vol. C-19,No.4,pp311-318,Apr.1970.
    3. Green, A. A., Berman, M., Switzer, P, and Craig, M. D., 1988, "A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal", IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, v. 26, no. 1, p. 65-74.
    4. Jia,Xiuping, Richards,J. A.,1999, "Segmented principal components transformation for efficient hyperspectral remote-sensing image display and classification.", IEEE Trans. On Geosci. And Remote Sensing, Vol.37, No.1, 538-542, Jan. 1999.
    5. Kazakos,D.,1978, "On the optimal linear feature." , IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, Vol. IT-24,No.5,pp651-652,Sept. 1978.
    6. Lee, C. and Landgrebe, D. A.,1993, "Feature extraction based on decision boundaries.", IEEE Trans on P.A.M.I. Vol. 15, No.4, April 1993.
    7. Richards,John A., Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis, An Introduction, Spriger-Verlag,1986.
    Acknowledgement
    The authors wish to thank Laboratory of Remote Sensing Information Sciences , Institute of Remote Sensing Applications for providing the data and their sincere help .

    Page 3 of 3
    | Previous |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book