Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 2000


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002
Sessions

Agriculture & Soil

Water Resources

Coastal Zone Monitoring

Digital Photogrammetry

Environment

Forest Resources

GIS & Data Integration

Hazard Mitigation

Image Processing

Educational & Profession

Global Change

Landuse

Mapping from Space & GPS

SAR/InSAR

Oceanography

Hyperspectral & Data Acquisition System

AirSAR/MASTER

Poster Sessions
  • Session 1
  • Session 2
  • Session 3



  • ACRS 2000


    Hazard Mitigation
    Integrating Remote Sensing and GIS for Fire Hazard Categorization & Resource Allocation. A case study of Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia.

    Results
    A methodology to categorize fire hazards was developed integrating remotely sensed raster data with cartographic vector data GIS and a spatial database to store and analyze fire hazards in the city of Bathurst, NSW, Australia was developed on a consistent and continuous coordinate system. Datasets that are available with all the councils within New South Wales were used selectively to devise the methodology so that it could be applied to other parts of the New South Wales State. The 250 x 250 metre grid was found to be the most appropriate 'areal unit' for the purpose of 'Hazard Categorization' and allocation of dynamic resources.

    Acknowledgments
    The study is a part of an ongoing joint project between the New South Wales Fire Brigades and the University of New South Wales supported by a scholarship from the New South Wales Fire Brigades and the author is particularly grateful to Trevor Neal, Dr Bruno Parolin and Professor Barry Garner for their advise.

    References
    • Corporate Strategy Group, "Hazard Categorization Project", The New South Wales Fire Brigades.1996.
    • K.Hewitt, "Regions of risk: a geographical introduction to disasters Longman, Harlow, U.K. 1997.
    • P.T. Blakie,T.Cannon, I.Davis, B.Wisner "At risk:natural hazards,people`s vulnerability and disasters. London:Routledge 1994.
    • S.Rayner, "Cultural theory and risk analysis". In: S.Krimsky, and D.Golding, Editors, "Social Theories of risk" Praeger, Westport,CT. 1992.
    • W.Gordon,J.Mooney,D Pratts "The People and the Hazard: the spatial context of major accident hazard management in Britain", Vol 20 pp119-235, 2000
    Table 1. (Source: NSWFB project) Hazard Categories
    General Hazard Type Specific Hazard Category Map Colour Code Brief description of hazard
    Special Hazard Category 1 Red A site that poses extreme hazards for people, property or environment, eg some hospitals and aged hostels, major lpg depots, chemical plants, oil refinery, etc.
    Intermediate Category 2Category 3 OrangeYellow May include some high hazard residential-but basically high hazard industrial/commercial occupancies with a high level of structural density within the Unit Survey Square.May include some high hazard residential-but basically high hazard industrial/commercial occupanc`s with low to moderate level of structural activity.
    Low or base level hazard Category 4Category 5 Dark greenLight green A fully developed area of residential and low hazard industrial/commercial occupancies.A partially developed area of residential and low hazard industrial/commercial occupancies


    Fig. 2 Work Process


    Page 2 of 2
    | Previous |

    Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book