Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 2004


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002 | 2004
Sessions

New Generation Sensors and Applications

Hyperspectral Sensing

Application of New Sensors

Airborne Sensing

3 Line Scanner

LiDAR

Digital Camera

New Generation Sensors

Data Processing

DEM/3D Generation

Change Detection

Data Fusion

Hyperspectral Data Processing

Automatic Feature Extraction

Automatic Classification

High Resolution Data Processing

Data Fusion

Image Classification

High Resolution Data Processing

GPS & Photogrammetry

Navigation System

Digital Photogrammetry



ACRS 2004


Data Processing: Automatic Feature Extraction
Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 4
| Next |


Automated Road Extraction and Updating Using the Atomi System - Performance Comparison Between Aerial Film, ADS40, IKONOS and Quickbird Orthoimagery

Chunsun Zhang a , Emmanual Baltsavias b
a Department of Geomatics, The University of Melbourne,
VIC 3010, Australia –
E-mail: chunsun@unilb.edu.au

b Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry,
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH)
Zurich, ETH-Hoenggerberg, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
E-mail: manos@geod.baug.ethz.ch


ABSTRACT
Automated road extraction from digital images has drawn considerable attention due to the need for the efficient acquisition and updating of road data for geodatabases. The development of new digital aerial sensors and high-resolution satellite sensors signifies a revolutionary change in image acquisition and the possibility of fully digital processing from image acquisition to the generation of value-added products for various applications. At ETH Zurich, we have developed an operational system for the automated extraction of 3D road networks from imagery that integrates the processing of colour image data and existing digital spatial databases. The system has been extensively tested on areas with diverse terrain relief and landcover types using different resolution stereo and orthoimages with good results. Recently, tests have been performed using ADS40, IKONOS and Quickbird data. This paper reports on the performance comparison of the ATOMI system using different sensor data in two varying test sites. Visual analysis and quantitative measures of accuracy, correctness and completeness are presented, with typical completeness and correctness values of over 90% and planimetric accuracy of 0.4 m to 1 m. The advantages and disadvantages using different sensor data for road network updating are also discussed.

1. INTRODUCTION
In modern map production, a shift has taken place from maps stored in analogue form on paper or film to a digital database containing topographic information. Recently, National Mapping Agencies, especially in Europe, wish to generate digital landscape/topographic models that conform to reality and do not include map generation effects. In addition, various existing and emerging applications require up-to-date, accurate and sufficiently attributed digital data, especially of roads and buildings. To cope with higher product demands, increase the productivity and cut cost and time requirements, automation tools in the production should be employed. As aerial images are a major source of primary data, it is obvious that automated aerial image analysis can lead to significant benefits. In addition, the development of new digital aerial sensors and high-resolution satellite (HRS) sensors signifies a revolutionary change in image acquisition and the possibility of fully digital processing from image acquisition to the generation of value-added products for various applications. At ETH Zurich, in cooperation with the Swiss Federal Office of Topography (swisstopo), we have developed a practical system for the automatic extraction of 3D road networks from imagery that integrates processing of colour images and existing digital spatial databases, within the project ATOMI (Baltsavias and Zhang, 2003; Zhang, 2003b). This paper reports on the performance of the ATOMI system using extensive areas with varying relief and landcover and images from different sensors.

Page 1 of 4
| Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book