Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > ACRS > 2004


1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2002 | 2004
Sessions

New Generation Sensors and Applications

Hyperspectral Sensing

Application of New Sensors

Airborne Sensing

3 Line Scanner

LiDAR

Digital Camera

New Generation Sensors

Data Processing

DEM/3D Generation

Change Detection

Data Fusion

Hyperspectral Data Processing

Automatic Feature Extraction

Automatic Classification

High Resolution Data Processing

Data Fusion

Image Classification

High Resolution Data Processing

GPS & Photogrammetry

Navigation System

Digital Photogrammetry



ACRS 2004


Data Processing: Automatic Feature Extraction


Automated Road Extraction and Updating Using the Atomi System - Performance Comparison Between Aerial Film, ADS40, IKONOS and Quickbird Orthoimagery



2. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ATOMI

2.1 Aims of ATOMI
The aim of ATOMI is to update roads digitised from 1:25,000 scale maps by fitting them to the real landscape, improve their planimetric accuracy to 1 m and derive road centerline heights with an accuracy of 1 to 2 m. The topology and the attributes of the existing datasets should be maintained. This update should be achieved by using the image analysis techniques developed at the Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry (IGP), ETH Zurich. The whole procedure should be implemented as a standalone software package, should be operational, fast, and most importantly reliable. We do not aim at full automation (ca. 80% completeness is a plausible target), but the “correct” results should be really correct to avoid checking manually the whole dataset. More details of ATOMI can be found in Eidenbenz et al. (2000). The standard input data includes 1:16,000 scale colour imagery, with 30 cm focal length, and 60%/20% forward/side overlap, scanned with 14 microns at a Zeiss SCAI, a nationwide DTM (DHM25) with 25 m grid spacing and accuracy of 1-3/5-8 m in lowlands/Alps, the vectorised map data (VEC25) of 1:25,000 scale. The VEC25 data have a RMS error of ca. 5-7.5 m and a maximum error of ca. 12.5 m, including generalisation effects. They are topologically correct, but due to their partly automated extraction from maps, some errors exist.

2.2 The Road Reconstruction System
The developed system makes full use of available information about the scene and contains a set of image analysis tools. The management of different information and the selection of image analysis tools are controlled by a knowledge-based system. We refer to Zhang (2003a) for more details. The system can extract roads with a minimum width of ca. 3 pixels. It focuses on extraction of roads in open rural areas. The system has been modified to work also with orthoimages, whereby the 3D information is extracted by overlaying the 2D information on the DSM or DTM. Our system includes tools for external evaluation of the extracted results, by comparing the extracted results with precise reference data. The quality measures aim at assessing completeness and correctness as well as geometric accuracy. Completeness measures the percentage of the reference data that lies within the buffer of the extracted roads, while correctness is the percentage of the extracted roads within the buffer of the reference data. The buffer distance is defined using the required accuracy of the project ATOMI, i.e. 1 m. The geometric accuracy is assessed by the mean and RMS of the distances between the extracted roads and the reference data. The detailed description for the computation of the external evaluation measures is presented in Zhang (2003a). The developed system has been implemented as a stand-alone package initially on SGI platforms for stereo and orthoimages and has been ported to Windows XP only for orthoimage processing, with the same user interface. The system imports imagery, the existing road database and height data, and outputs the extracted road network as well as the computed road attributes including length and width in 3D Arc/Info Shapefile format that is readily imported into existing GIS software. The Windows XP version for orthoimages is termed ATOMIRO (with R standing for roads and O for orthoimages). All current and further improvements of the system and the tests reported here refer to ATOMIRO, while the SGI versions have been frozen.

3. TEST SITES AND DATA DESCRIPTION
Results from two test sites in Switzerland will be presented here, one in Thun and the other one close to the city of Geneva. The selection is mainly based on the consideration (1) the test sites should cover as many types of typical landcover in Switzerland as possible, and (2) the availability of images from multiple sensors. Both sites are in open rural areas but with different landcover. All road types in Switzerland can be found in the areas. The description of the test sites and the available imagery are listed in Table 1. Fig. 1 shows aerial images of the two test sites. Much larger and different regions have been used for tests by swisstopo with a total road length of about 9,000 km.

Table 1. Test site description and image specifications.


Figure 1. Overview of test sites: (a) Thun, (b) Geneva.

In Thun, the orthoimages were produced by swisstopo from aerial images of scale 1:16,000 using the DHM25. The 50-cm orthoimage is part of the nationwide dataset Swissimage with a planimetric accuracy of about 1 m. The images for 20 cm and 60 cm were taken in spring 2003 and for 50 cm in summer 1998. An orthoimage created from ADS40 summer images using the DHM25 is also available. Due to weaknesses in the control point distribution and the bundle adjustment of the ADS40 images, a discrepancy between the ADS40 orthoimage and the 20-cm orthoimage has been observed. A non-exhaustive comparison with manually selected feature points shows that the discrepancy varies between 0 and 80 cm. However, smaller differences also exist between the 1998 and 2003 aerial film orthoimages, caused by errors in the sensor orientation. Thus, the real accuracy of road extraction in image space is higher than the accuracy values derived from comparison between datasets (incl. the reference data), which have varying orientation errors. The Geneva test site (Fig. 1b) is near the city of Geneva, containing several larger villages, forest and a river. Another difference to the Thun site is that the scene contains grasslands and large fields of bare soil. In addition, many road-like lines are observed in the fields. The aerial orthoimage came from the Swissimage dataset. IKONOS and Quickbird images were also acquired in May 2001 and July 2003 respectively. The pansharpened (PSM) orthoimages of IKONOS and Quickbird were produced by software developed at IGP using a 2- m grid laser DTM with 0.5-m accuracy and had a planimetric accuracy of 0.5-0.8 m. The reference data for the Thun and Geneva test sites were measured manually, by swisstopo in 20- cm pixel size aerial orthoimages and by ETH Zurich in the Swissimage orthoimages, respectively. The tests were performed on a DELL PC with Pentium 4, 1.8GHz CPU and 1GB RAM running Windows XP.

Page 2 of 4
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book