|
|
|
Overview |
Crop Production |
Crop Pattern |
Crop Yield |
Irrigation |
Soil Management | Precision Farming |
Relevant Products |
Relevant Links
Multisource data fusion results of fused optical and SAR data for Irigated rice areas identification
Worawattanamateekul J., Canisius X. J. F., Samarakoon L.,
Asian Center for Research on Remote Sensing
Asian Institute of Technology
P.O.Box4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani
12120 Thailand
E-Mail: jirathan@ait.ac.th , canisius@ait.ac.th
Abstract Food security
has become a global key issue, and this is a major concern particularly to
Asian region due to rapid expansion of Asian population. In many countries
of the region, accurate evaluation of food production and estimation is
not possible due to lack of information. Further, insufficient or obsolete
information hampers timely solutions when there is a decrease in
production, and introducing appropriate solutions for increase
productivity. One of the basic information that is not available in most
of the countries in Asian region is the cultivated area that could keep
the planers well informed of the future harvest, and prepared for food
crisis in advance. This paper examined the potential of satellite remote
sensing in estimating irrigated paddy cultivated areas in a test site in
Indonesia. Due to frequent cloud cover in this area solely rely on optical
sensor data is a limiting factor of using satellite data for mapping.
Attempt was made to integrate SAR data acquired during growing period with
optical data to overcome this limitation. Data from JERS-1, optical and
SAR data was used for the study. Applying various fusion methods, it was
found that combination of vegetation index, average intensities of SAR,
and principal component of optical data gives the optimal solution for the
test area. Results proved data fusion from different sources acquired in
various stages irrespective to their source could satisfactorily be used
in estimating irrigated paddy area under cultivation.
Introduction
Data fusion means a very wide domain and it is quite difficult to provide a precise definition.
Several definitions of data fusion have been proposed. Pohl and Van Genderen (1998) defined
" image fusion is the combination of two or more different images to form a new image by using
a certain algorithm" which is restricted to image. Hall and Llinas (1997) defined "data fusion
techniques combine data from multiple sensors, and related information from associated databases,
to achieve improved accuracy and more specific inferences that could be achieved by the use of
single sensor alone". This definition focused on information quality and fusion methods.
According to these definitions, it could imply that purposes of data fusion should be the
information obtained that hopefully should at least improve image visualization and
interpretation.
There are several fusion approaches, generally, fusion can be divided into three main categories
based on the stage at which the fusion is performed namely: pixel based, feature based and
decision based. Among these approaches, only pixel based method had been considered in this
study. In pixel based fusion, the data are merged on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Feature based
approach always merge the different data sources at the intermediate level. Each image from
different sources is segmented and the segmented images are fused together. Decision based
fusion, the outputs of each of the single source interpretation are combined to create a new
interpretation.
Although there are many data
sources for the purpose of fusion, this study was mainly dedicated to only
remote sensing data fusion and their visualization with the following
possibilities; multitemporal and multisensor data fusion. Several remote
sensing data have been acquired and some possible fusion techniques were
applied to these data to generate image fusion results. Results of fused
data were demonstrated and interpreted in terms of its usefulness in
irrigated rice field identification.
Test Area and Data Used
Semarang is the selected test area and located in Java Island, Indonesia.
Both optical and SAR data were used in this study. Figure 1 shows false color composite of
JERS-OPS data of test area, table 1 present satellite data descriptions used in the study.
 |
| Satellite | Sensor | Date |
| JERS-OPS | Visible-NIR | 24/8/96 |
| JERS | SAR | 09/96 |
| JERS | SAR | 11/96 |
| JERS | SAR | 03/97 |
| ADEOS | AVNIR | 31/5/96 |
| Landsat | TM | 09/96 |
|
| Figure1: Map of Test Area |
Table 1 Remote Sensing Data
Descriptions |
Methodology
All remotely sensed data both optical and SAR data required systematic corrections. The data
distributor normally provides this step. Speckle reduction by applying speckle specific filter
is the next process applied to SAR data to reduce the data noise while retaining the information.
Subsequently, 16 bit SAR data were converted to 8 bit data to be able to compare with 8 bit
optical data. In the optical side, the data were necessary to go through atmospheric correction
step. Then, both optical and radar data were coregistered in order to be fused together. Finally,
the visualization step presents results of fusing data. Figure 2 shows general steps in fusion
process.
 Figure 2: Data Fusion Process
Figure 2 shows general steps in data fusion process. However, it is necessary keeping in mind
that the previous steps in the flow are crucial for the succeeding steps and therefore to the
overall accuracy of the image map. Selection of data for fusion is very important as fusing
inappropriate data could deteriorate information content.
|
|
|