|
|
|
General |
Site Prediction |
Interview |
Relevant Links
GIS Archaeology survey
Khalid Gourad
Khalid Gourad is a GIS consultant in US.
gourad@erols.com
Archaeology, as a spatial discipline, has used GIS in a variety of ways. At the simplest
level, GIS has found applications as database management for archaeological
records, with the added benefit of being able to create instant maps. It has
been implemented in cultural resource management contexts, where archaeological
site locations are predicted using statistical models based on previously
identified site locations. It has also been used to simulate diachronic changes
in past landscapes, and as a tool in intra-site analysis; although this last
application has not enjoyed the same popularity as the others.
An online
survey was conducted seeking to establish a quantitative approach to the use of
GIS in archaeology, its capabilities and limits.
The survey consisted of
six parts: The first part gave instructions as how to and who should complete
the survey, and an approximation of how long doing so should take. The second
part asked for information about the participant; his or her name, which was
optional; geographic location; title; and degree held. The third part attempted
to establish the participants’ familiarity with GIS.
The fourth part of
the survey determined how the participant used his or her GIS software The fifth
part of the survey asked for the impact of GIS on the participant’s research.
Finally, the sixth part of the survey sought to establish the participant’s
familiarity with GIS issues that potentially skew the results. This part is
beyond the scope of this article. For details, visit http://research.hunter.cuny.edu/arch/survey.html
About the Participants The project ultimately accepted 140 entries.
The list of the geographic location of the participants is given in Table 1.
Table 1: Number of entries from
various countries
| Country |
Entries |
Country |
Entries
|
| U. S. A |
78 |
France |
1 |
| U. K. |
12 |
Lebanon |
1 |
| Spain |
11 |
Canada |
1 |
| Australia |
10 |
Austria |
1 |
| Sweden |
3 |
Denmark |
1 |
| Germany |
2 |
Romania |
1 |
| Japan |
2 |
Greece |
1 |
| Finland |
2 |
Hungary |
1 |
| Netherland |
2 |
Slovenia |
1 |
| Belgium |
2 |
Norway |
1 |
| Italy |
2 |
Chile |
1 |
| Portugal |
1 |
South Africa |
1 |
| Ireland |
1
|
Fig 1: GIS Software used by Archeologists
(n=115)
Seventy seven per cent had higher degrees. 91% were
involved in GIS projects when they completed the survey. More than 72% had more
than two years of experience using the tool, which is a reasonable amount of
time to familiarise oneself with the technology. It was interesting that 33% of
the participants had not attended any formal GIS classes, workshops, or
seminars. It is important to note that the length of the classes and their level
were not emphasized. The question was intended to establish who had taught
themselves GIS and who had not. Frequency of GIS use was high, with 41% of the
participants using the tool everyday.
Support groups are a way of
sharing news, suggestions and problems with people that share a common interest.
Being part of an online support group is now one of the best ways to find out
about common applications of GIS use as well as common mistakes. Thirty two per
cent of the participants were members of GIS support groups. Only 6% of the
participants attended GIS related conferences on a frequent basis. Going to a
conference about a topic is a good indicator of the level of involvement of the
participant in that topic.
|
|
|