|
|
|
Crustal deformation studies through GPS measurements
| Sl. No. | Station Nos. | | 1. | 99,92,154,155 | | 2. | 99,154,156,161 | | 3. | 146,151,152,154 | | 4. | 150,151,160,161 | | 5. | 157,160,162,163 | | 6. | 139,150,153 | | 7. | 138,139,143,162 | | 8. | 142,143,158,162 |
| 9. | 140,144,158,159 | | 10. | 142,148,159,162 | | 11. | 146,148,149,160 | | 12. | 97,98,146,147 | | 13. | 95,96,141,147 | | 14. | 96,97,145,148 | | 15. | 139,150,157,164 |
Results and Analysis
Differences in the Horizontal Position of 29 stations ( New Value - Old Value ) are tabulated below :
|
S.No.
|
Station
|
Resultant
Difference
|
Direction
From North
|
Magnitude
|
|
1.
|
PILVA
|
H.S./ 0092
|
197.4
|
1.9
|
|
2.
|
BOLAS
|
H.S. / 0095
|
93.4
|
5.2
|
|
3.
|
OSHAM
|
H.S. / 0096
|
116.5
|
4.8
|
|
4.
|
SAKHPUR
|
H.S. / 0097
|
102.1
|
2.9
|
|
5.
|
CHAMARDIA
|
H.S. / 0098
|
131.7
|
2.3
|
|
6.
|
HONITALL
|
H.S. / 0138
|
208.1
|
4.2
|
|
7.
|
KHAN KHARIA
|
S. / 0139
|
215.4
|
3.4
|
|
8.
|
MORDHO
|
H.S. / 0140
|
169.5
|
4.7
|
|
9.
|
MADHAVPUR
|
H.S. / 0141
|
115.4
|
5.7
|
|
10.
|
KAKARWA
|
H.S. / 0142
|
159.8
|
3.3
|
|
11.
|
BELA
|
H.S. / 0143
|
212.8
|
3.7
|
|
12.
|
LAKH PAT
|
S. / 0144
|
184.4
|
11.1
|
|
13.
|
PATELKA
|
H.S. / 0145
|
128.2
|
4.5
|
|
14.
|
KAMA KIO MATA
|
H.S. / 0146
|
118.2
|
3.3
|
|
15.
|
DANGARVADI
|
H.S. / 0147
|
90.0
|
4.9
|
|
16.
|
HADATODA
|
H.S. / 0148
|
131.9
|
2.3
|
|
17.
|
KANTRODI
|
H.S. / 0149
|
151.6
|
4.2
|
|
18.
|
SONADA
|
T.S. / 0150
|
246.6
|
1.6
|
|
19.
|
MITALI
|
H.S. / 0151
|
70.3
|
0.9
|
|
20.
|
GOGHA
|
H.S. / 0152
|
76.6
|
2.7
|
|
21.
|
GHODI
|
H.S. / 0153
|
227.8
|
2.3
|
|
22.
|
SIDHPUR
|
S. / 0154
|
270.0
|
0.9
|
|
23.
|
TARBHAN
|
H.S. / 0155
|
212.0
|
2.2
|
|
24.
|
UCHAK
|
H.S. / 0156
|
303.0
|
5.1
|
|
25.
|
BOLADI
|
H.S. / 0158
|
197.1
|
4.8
|
|
26.
|
VADHODA
|
T.S. / 0160
|
222.8
|
1.3
|
|
27.
|
RICHHIA
|
H.S. / 0161
|
310.8
|
1.9
|
|
28.
|
PATA-I-SHAH
|
H.S. / 0162
|
202.3
|
3.0
|
|
29
|
KESMARI
|
H.S. / 0163
|
204.8
|
0.7
|
A Chart showing the horizontal differences in the co-ordinates of 29 points is attached at Annexure-II. Maximum shift is noticed at station Nos. 0095, 0096, 0140, 0141, 0144, 0145, 0147, 0156 and 0158. Remaining points show very moderate shift, taking into account the fact that the G.T. Co-ordinates are more than 140
years old.
The large differences in the old G.T. and new derived positions can not be attributed solely to the shift of station positions. The accuracy of G.T.Co-ordinates may be of the order of 10 ppm. Since the network extends to around 500 km in East-West direction, there could be an uncertainty as large as 5 m. The Maximummovement of 11.1 m in almost Southern direction has been noticed near Lakhpat. Other shift in the positions are in Easterly directions, in the areas lying South-South-East of the epicenter and in SE and SW directions in the areas situated E of the epicentre. The crust appears to have taken an anti-clockwise swing. Lakhpat situated North-West of the epicentre is a case in anomaly, registering Southerly shift as large as 11 m.
Conclusion
GPS observed baselines can yield sub-centimetre accuracies. The present comparison has been made between the classical technique i.e. G.T. Triangulation having limitations of 10 ppm accuracies and the GPS technique which is much more accurate. Although, certain broad indications of the movement of the crust have been noticed in the present study, it is most desirable to have a second set of GPS measurements after a gap of 2 years, with observation sessions having the same group of vectors, as observed during field season 2000-2001. Comparison between the two sets of vectors observed during 2000-2001 and say 2002-2003 will then be more reliable for critically analysing the differences and their relationship with the crustal deformations.
|
|
|