GISdevelopment.net ---> Application ---> Natural Hazard Management

Fire risk: The case of Delhi


In Delhi there has been a substantial increase in population and industrialization, since Independence. Well over 1,50,000 small scale industrial units in identified industrial units in identified industrial pockets (in addition to industries running illegally), over 1200 J.J. Clusters providing shelter to nearly one third of the population and over 3.5 million automotive vehicles have choked infrastructural services. The fast increased has not been planned for.

Master Plan for Delhi, had been created as an instrument to control the use of land in urban area and protect the welfare of people. The concept of zoning has not yielded desirable results over and above allowing for mixed use and occupancy, authorized as well as unauthorized. Banquet halls in residential areas, cottage industries in congested areas, trade of hazardous chemicals from the highly congested residential/commercial areas, hazardous and non hazardous industries in close vicinity are few to menmtion which have further deteriorated environemental services. This has certainly added to the fire risk already inherited by a particular occupancy. As a result losses due to fire are increasing to both the life and property. This is developing a dangerous trend. Man-made disasters are likely in these areas.

Lal Kuan tragedy that claimed 58 lives has not fixed from our memories. Zoning and mixed use planning is a vital part of urban design. However, it can fail through abuse, misuse, and resistance to changes in urban pattern essential for the general welfare of the population. The price , which is being paid, is high. It needs to be understood, appreciated and accepted that the solution to complex problems is not always simple and widely acknowledged . Many a times they are complex, hard and unpopular in a democratic setup.

The recent fire incident data as provided in the table can provide a clear assessment of the fire incidents in Delhi and their increase. In order to contain these rising trends, sometimes hard unpopular decisions need to be taken. However, unpopular these decisions could be, they are the need of the hour and shall have to be taken at the earliest.

Details of total fire calls and loss etc. in Delhi

No Year No. of calls Approx
loss(lakhs)
Property
saved(lakhs)
Injured Deaths Medium Serious Major
1 94-95 13334 4620 7144 1397 318 19 5 0
2 95-96 15519 5787 6493 1504 389 16 6 1
3 96-97 14866 4989 8190 1704 398 18 4 0
4 97-98 14254 2439 10389 1967 399 15 6 0
5 98-99 15455 2170 5547 1495 375 22 6 0


Occupancy wise breakup

Year JJ Cluster
(No.of slums)
High Rise Industrial Residential Others
1989 168 (5856) 158 422 1571 3924
1990 180 (17286) 138 489 1760 4357
1991 150 (10201) 150 475 1604 4880
1992 168 (9634) 128 516 1785 5853
1993 163 (4557) 173 458 1882 4950
1994 150 (5639) 113 602 2139 5809
1995 173 (5277) 72 655 2240 6640
1996 130 (2891) 75 767 2606 7734
1997 115 (1985) 87 653 2681 7646
1998 108 (5820) 87 590 2462 7081


Trends
Although the number of calls have only marginally increased, number of deaths have increased potentially. The basic reason is that deaths are not as much due to burning but more because of inhalation of toxic fumes, which get concentrated in high density less open space area. It is the lack of circulation/ventilation within tenements. In industrial areas there is disrespect for the safety measures required and hence large numner of deaths or injury due to fires occur.

Number of fire incidents in jhuggis and jhopairs clusters/high-rise buildings have reduced while fire incidents in industrial and residential areas have increased. One of the reason for such increase is, that industrial areas have started hosting non-confirming industries and residential areas have become haven for illegal storage's and dangerous commercial activities in pursuit of mixed permitting land and occupancy in these areas. Also, disrespect to circulation space and open space and increase in congestion in these areas have caused poor accessibility to the place of tragic incidence, which takes only records to increase.

If the number of incidents of fires is carefully studied area wise in Delhi maximum percent of calls of fire incidents have been received in Shahdra, in the east division, Janakpuri (west division), Moti Nagar (northwest),Connaught Circus (central) , Roopnagar and Nehru Place in South Delhi. The reason is congestion and illegal storage of recycling material and chemicals.

If we analyze the causes of maximum number of fires in Delhi 70 percent of calls are due to electric short circuiting. This is alarming because a single cause can be disastrous to life and property that major investments are required mitigating these risks.

Short-circuiting is often a result of illegal connections, low quality wiring and therefore even if single major cause is taken, of, not only would it lead to saving innumerable lives and properties but also cut down on expenditure incurred on fire mitigation.

Division wise percentage of calls in Delhi

Zone 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 Average
EAST 20.27% 20.63% 23.40% 23.56% 22.76% 22.12%
WEST 11.07% 14.21% 14.27% 15.83% 15.84% 14.38%
NORTH-WEST 22.07% 37.05% 19.67% 19.04% 18.28% 23.22%
CENTRAL 25.34% 24.20% 22.72% 23.33% 23.07% 23.73%
SOUTH 20.52% 20.80% 19.85% 21.27% 20.87% 20.67%


Causes of fire

  1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98
Electricity short circuit 5848 6473 70.40% 7433 7268
Carelessness 1701 1728 18.37% 1896 1466
Miscellaneous 308 504 0.75% 356 387
Spark M/Heat 156 258 1.73 203 160
Fire Works 139 146 1.68% 198 59
Unknown 138 184 1.49% 181 166
Naked Flame 105 133 4.59% 351 288
Intentional 75 986 0.90% 121 109
Incendiarism 45 16 - 22 16
Spontaneous 13 1 - 0 0
Radiation 10 4 - 1 0
Lighting 6 0 0 1 0
Children Playing with fire 6 2 0.00% 1 0


Issues

High population density, crowded streets, unmatching mixed occupancies, inadequate water supply, poor electrical services, unplanned siting of fire stations, encroachment are few examples of ineffective planning which adversely affect the fire response time. Under the present circumstances, a response time of 3 minutes in urban areas and 5 minutes in rural areas is very difficult to achieve. Mobilizing a large quantity of water to the fire scene in walled city area is more than fire fighting. After every fire, as a customary, fire service is blamed for one thing or the other but public, planners as wells as bureaucracy are least bothered to analyze the constraints under which services perform. Fire safety should therefore be an integral part of urban planning process rather than an after thought.

The developmental activities are in full swing in the sub-urban area, with complete disrespect to environment and fire safety aspects in absence of regulatory laws exempted in these areas. In times to come they will form the part of the urban areas with the problems they are creating today and as customary all the agencies concerned shall wake up to discuss the problems with the active support of the media. Also as customary, they probably will not find a solution to resolve the problem. It may not affect the planners but it puts pressure on the emergency services that are also by now accustomed to the criticism for no faults of their. Inquiry committees and commissions will continue to be appointed incident after incident but the recommendations will have the same fate like in the past for simple reasons that it may require hard political decisions to which any elected body would be hesitant.

It should not be mistaken that all this is happening only due to failure of planning or enforcement of a plan. Many of the problems are attributable to the lack of awareness and knowledge about the concept of fire safety. The designers of the buildings and the planners of the town have no formal education in the fire safety management. Fire services has also failed to participate in urban planning process, either due to the fact that they are not the part of the urban affairs or due to the fact that they are not the part of the urban affairs or due to the fact that they too, do not possess adequate and reliable data base to project their concern in the planning process. They have also failed in providing an interactive forum for the architects, planners, citizens and the fire professional to discuss and resolve the issue causing concern to each other.
  • Database and comprehensive evaluation of risks of each single area, its vulnerability to fires and available equipment, personal and foolproof communication system is not available.
  • Adequate resources for the services and coordinattion with the cities is not there.
  • Multiplicity of agencies with different objectives causes repetition and lack of responsibility towards a cause like meeting fire crisis. Coordination is essential.
  • There is no honest interaction between the architects, interior desighers. Structural engineers and fire professionals. Inflexible regulations have neither helped noir will they help in future.
  • Fire Services have to fight a lone battle to get safety norms prescribed in building bye-laws and the National Building Code implemented.
  • The people's perception about fire risk is correlated with social, cultural and psychological factors. The fire services has since long addressed this issue with a most generic view. The message about fire safely is the same for entire population. The public has also reciprocated in the same generic way. No single shot therapy is possible in risk communication. Fire service personnel must learn how to reach them and how to listen to them. Having spent so long working on reactive response i.e. dispatching appliances on a call, the fire professionals are making job more difficulty by developing into "fire fighting" culture in the organization instead of desired combination of "fire prevention " and "fire fighting". There are a large number of groups within and outside the fire department who can work together to make a difference before the event. What the government is not doing is not the issue, but the real issue is what we can do and what we are not doing.
  • Fire Services have been placed under the control of the local bodies in the Constitution of India. However it has been termed as a law and order activity in independence India. The biggest draw back in considering the fire services as a 'law and order activity' has been in their isolation or less participation in the policy making body of the state and that regulates the urban affairs, which is otherwise essential in view of fire prevention. Hence, fire services are executing only half of their responsibility. Should the fire services be organized under the authority of the urban affairs or should this continue to remain with authority controlling the home affairs, is a million dollar question.
Conceptual change from fire fighting to fire prevention
As far as the technological issues concerning public safety in urban areas, is concerned, the fire professionals, have failed miserably in making the architects and planners to understand the problems faced by the fire services in the buildings designed by them or an area developed by them. All are their wisdom. Every one is doing what he feels like resulting in fire safety chaos. Under these circumstances, we should not expect better results than what we are getting.

References
  1. Delhi at Risk - A Preliminary Assessment of Delhi's Vulnerability to Natural Disasters. SEEDS
  2. SHELTER - A HUDCO-HSMI Publication. Special Issue World Disaster Reduction Day.
  3. Delhi 1999 - A Fact Sheet national Capital Region planning Board
  4. Slow Murder - The Deadly Story of Vehicular Pollution in India Center for Science and Environment, Study Directed by Anil Agarwal. Written by Anju Sharma and Anumita Roychowdhury.
  5. Disaster Prone JJ Clusters Along River Basin in Delhi - Meteorological and social aspects, M.G. Gupta.
  6. Saving the Delhi Ridge - One year of conservation Action srishi Report, WWF - India
  7. Future Cities - Special Issue, BMPTC
  8. Economic Survey of Delhi 1999 - 2000. Planning Department Government of NCT of Delhi.
  9. Proceedings of the 4th Congress International Association Volume VIII page 77 - 86, 1982, VK Srivastava and AK Rao
  10. INSA Proc. Page 429-447, RKS Chauhan
Total No. of calls and concentration of call in Delhi

NAME OF STATION 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98
EAST DIVISION
GEETA COLONY 525 494691610645
LAXMI NAGAR 402 498 717 672 591
DARYA GANJ 573 543 755 692 598
TOTAL 2468 2751 3632 3456 3245
WEST DIVISION
JANAKPURI 82 625 867 859 837
NAJAFGARH 208 252 273 229 257
KIRTI NAGAR 446 316 309 279 269
SHANKAR ROAD 214 200 246 328 244
PRASAD NAGAR 303 310 354 405 285
NARAINA 176 192 166 221 166
TOTAL 1429 1895 215 2321 2258
NORTH WEST
MOTI NAGAR 749 570 608 601 512
KESAV PURAM 527 508 591 568 568
BADLI 167 191 229 191 173
ROHINI 324 464 481 488 540
BAWANA 120 108 138 119 101
NARELA 177 185 213 211 148
WAZIR PUR 327 349 46 338 310
JANAKPURI 296 307 377 277 307
TOTAL 2688 4940 3053 2793 2606
CENTRAL
CONNAUGHT CIRCUS 830 787 899 879 934
RAKAB GANJ 267 252 282 253 311
RASTRAPATI BHAWAN 16 20 6 11 8
TELEWARA 190 236 227 207 182
J.R.ROAD 423 428 508 512 444
ROOP NAGAR 832 915 1021 997 924
S.P.MUKHRJEE MARG 528 589 583 563 485
TOTAL 3086 3227 3526 3422 3288
SOUTH
OKHLA 200 239 264 232 209
NEHRU PLACE 705 782 974 984 916
MATHURA ROAD 417 486 552 568 551
B.CAMA PLACE 376 414 417 405 391
CHANAKYA PURI 318 378 360 405 348
SAFDERJANG 484 474 519 526 560
TOTAL 2500 2773 3086 3120 2975


© GISdevelopment.net. All rights reserved.