Abstract
This integrated approach of Geographic Information System (GIS) and Remote
Sensing (RS) is now being recognised universally as an unique, highly effective
and extremely versatile technology for evaluation management and monitoring of
natural resources and environment. After the successful launch of IRS-1C in
December 1995, now in India, every natural resource and environmental
investigation begins with utilising and analysing remote sensing data. Small
Hydro Power (SHP) has been one of the earliest renewable energy generation
technologies in existence since the beginning of 20th century. There has been
various estimation suggesting tht potential of SHP in the country is over 10,000
MW, of which only a small fraction (2-3%) has been harnessed so far, Under
UNDP-GEF Hilly Hydro Project (HPP), Ministry of Non-conventional Energy Sources
(MNES), Govt. of India an attempt has been made by Alternate Hydro Energy Centre
in collaboration with Department of Earth Sciences (DES), Deptt . Of Civil
Engineering (CED) (Centre for Remote Sensing), University of Roorkee and
Institute of Hydrology (NIH), to identify the real potential available for SHP
in India Himalayas. In UNDP-GEF-HPP about 1700 potential small hydro sites in
thirteen Himalayan hilly states of India have been identified. In small hydro
projects planning and development, GIS and RS was adopted for SHP planning
resource management to acquire latest information from the analysis of RS data
and manage all these thematic information along with other attribute information
on a GIS platform for UNDP-GEF-HPP. All information collected through various
sources are now available to the potential developers for site selection and
planning purposes. Various types of queries (both spatial an non spatial) can be
performed on a GIS platform based on conditions raised by the different users.
Introduction
Energy is one of the main basic
inputs for the accelerated economic development. Small hydro
power is probably the oldest and yet the most reliable and
environment friendly source of all renewable energy, with bulk
of its potential yet to be harnessed in many countries
including India. Though hydro power development started with
small units of 100 KW and more in the beginning, the attention
was diverted to harnessing medium and major hydro because
their comparative economics. However continous oil crunch has
forced the attention of the concerned for harnessing small
hydro at the toe of existing dams, at canal drops and
exploiting hill streams to supplement the energy generation.
Being environmentally benign and having small gestation period
has led many countries to harness these resources in concerted
manner with China in the forefront.
The integrated
approach of GIS and Remote Sensing is being is being
recognised universally as an unique highly effective and
extremely versatile technology for evaluation, management and
monitoring of natural resources and environment. With the
concept of multidisciplinary integrated approach got an
impetus in monitoring and management of resources and
environment. Through, aerial photography, the forerunner of
present day satellite remote sensing, has been in vogue for a
very long time, however the real spurt in the worldwide usage
of the technology came in the launch of Landsat series of
satellites, the first of which as put in orbit in 1972. The
real advantage of staellite remote sensing system is evident
from the fact that they provide a vantage point in space to
study the earth and its environment and provide a unique
opportunity for inventoring, mapping, and monitoring. Data
available from various operational remote sensing satellite
are improving in terms of spatial, spectral and temporal
resolutions. After alunch of IRS-1C in December 1995, now 5.6m
spatial resolution data of any part of the earth can be
acquired (Saraf, 1997; Saraf, Kumar 1997). Few potential uses
of GIS and RS in SHP planning and resource management have
been discussed by Jagdeesha and Adiga (1997) and Rajpal and
Mettle (1997) Kulkarni et al., (1997) discussed stream flow
simulation study in snow covered areas for estimation of
hydropower potential using remote sensing data. Faucher et.
Al. (1993) have developed a hydraulic model designed to make
use of remote sensing and GIS in SHP planning. FIGURE
However, there are not many studies which provide
clearly the integrated application of GIS and RS in SHP and
particularly in hilly areas such as the Himalayas. The present
article brings some applications of integrated GIS and RS in
SHP planning and development.
Any study pertaining to
the environs of the developmental activity must encompass
spatial, dynamic and temporal attributes of the environment to
obtain comprehensive and reliable results. The simplest way of
finding out changes over a period of time is to compare
remotely sensed temporal data and demarcate the changed areas
using either visual or digital analysis techniques. Remote
sensing data can be used to show the quantity and pattern of
deforestation, current and historical land use, identify load
centres and larger streams, to locate rocky and erosion prone
area, and to provide a foundation upon which all other digital
data can be georefrenced in the GIS (Rajpal and Mettel, 1997)
. Remote sensing data particularly from IRS-1C PAN sensor can
also be utilized to generate digital elevation model (DEM) to
further support SHP planning and development, however,
Himalayas frequent cloud and snow covers poses some problems
in acquiring data sets. RS data can also be utilised to assess
the positive impacts associated with the development of SHP in
the Himalayas, where deforestation is taking place at an
alarming rate.
GIS have become of increasing
significance in recent years. One main reason for this in the
field of SHP is the need to compare a great number of
area-related data describing the natural resources and
environment. Since GIS can be used to couple area-related data
will their attributes, and can overlay these, they represent
highly efficient instruments for such planning tasks.
UNDP-GEF-Hilly Hydro Project ExperienceIn
the UNDP-GEF-Hilly Project (UNDP-GEF-HHP) about six hundred
Survey of India (SOI) toposheets of 1:50,000 scale were
scanned manually about 1700 potential small hydro sites based
on perennial channel (>5.0 km)l, catchment area
(>10km2), accessibility etc. criteria were identified. All
drawing of such sites contain various attribute information as
show in Table 1 and Figure 1. Many of the information which
collected / retrieve from SOI toposheets were utilized for
potential head and regional flow duration curves
determinations. All the attribute information were
computerised / fed into the Lotus spreadsheet programms.
One of the objective of the UNDP-GEF-HHP was to
prepare Zonal plan with maps of all thirteen states in order
to identify potential clusters for development purpose. It is
general belief that if potential sites form clusters than
development of such clusters would be preferred by the
developers rather than having scattered sites. To achieve this
goal, SOI 1:1,000,000 scale map were digitized using ILWIS GIS
software (then available with authors). During digitization
various information such as river network (all blue lines in
SOI maps), state and district boundaries, rail and road
network and location of major towns, graticules (latitude and
longitude) which were useful for planning and development were
digitized and kept in geographic co-ordinate system for
further analysis and utilization in GIS . On the base map as
discussed above all potential sites location (main channel
meeting point with the main river) were plotted in order to
prepare cluster maps for all thirteen states (Figure 2). Such
maps have been utilized to identify cluster of potential SHP.
Table 1
Showing details of information parameters of catchment
extracted form SOI Topographic maps under
UNDP-GEF-HHP.
|
S. No.
|
Information/parameters of
cathllinformation/parameters of catchment
|
|
1
|
SOI toposheets references
|
|
2
|
Name of the stream as mentioned in the SOI
toposheet
|
|
3
|
Name of river basin in which potential sites exists
|
|
4
|
Catchment area (in Km2) measured using
Planimeter
|
|
5
|
Length of main channel (in Km) measured using
Rotometer
|
|
6
|
Catchment perimeter (in Km) measured using
Planimeter
|
|
7
|
Highest elevation point of the catchment (in meter
above msl)
|
|
8
|
Elevation at stream meeting point with the main
river (in meter above msl)
|
|
9
|
Stream meeting point coordinates (Latitude and
longitude) with the main river (in degree and
minutes)
|
|
10
|
Information about the snow / glacier/ rain fed of
the catchment ( it is possible to identify glaciers and
snow covered areas in the SOI toposheets)
|
|
11
|
Name of the state in which the potential catchment
is situated
|
|
12
|
Name of the district in which the potential
catchment is situated.
|
|
13
|
Major contour lines cutting the main channel near
the main river meeting points were also marked I order
to extract information regarding available hydraulic
head for power generation
|
|
14
|
Major roads available near the potential site
|
|
15
|
Locations of villages and town were also marked in
all drawings to have an idea about the load/power
consumption centres.
|
|
16
|
Latitude and longitude (in degree and minutes) on
all sides of the
drawing
|
Seismicity also
plays important role in SHP planning and development. Separate
maps containing epicentre locations of all earthquakes
(>4.0 magnitude) occurred after 1928 (information was
obtained from United State Geological Survey) were also
plotted (Figure 3) on the digital base map in GIS. Various
seismic zones relevant with different states were also
retrieved from Zoning Map of India and overlaid on seismic
maps prepared under this project. A combined sets of maps were
also prepared under this project. A combined sets of maps were
also prepared for all thirteen sates containing base map,
potential SHP locations and earthquakes epicentres (Figure 4).
The main purpose of this was to provide information about the
coincidence of potential SHP cluster with the earthquake
epicentre locations, so that necessary.

Figure 3

Figure 4
Precautionary
/ remedial measured during design of the project can be
considered and appropriately incorporated. A quantitative
analysis based on spatial random distribution vs nearest -
neighbour was also performed using SHP cluster maps and
earthquake epicentre maps. This analysis provides further
support to quantify cluster identification process (Table 2a
& 2b).