The Model
Soil and Water
Assessment Tool (SWAT)SWAT is a river basin or watershed scale model
developed by the USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS). SWAT was developed to
predict the impact of land management practices on water, sediment and
agricultural chemical yields in large complex watersheds with varying soils,
land use and management conditions over long periods of time. SWAT is a
continuous time model operating on daily time step. The command structure of
SWAT is presented in Fig.2.
Model Components
The sub-basin
components of SWAT can be placed into eight major divisions--hydrology, weather,
sedimentation, soil temperature, crop growth, nutrients, pesticides, and
agricultural management.
- Hydrology - Surface runoff, Percolation, Lateral Subsurface Flow,
Groundwater Flow, Evapo-transpiration, Snow melt and Transmission Losses
- Weather - Precipitation, Air Temperature, Solar Radiation, Wind Speed
and Relative humidity.
- Sedimentation - Sediment Yield.
- Soil temperature - Daily average soil temperature is simulated at the
center of each soil layer for use in hydrology and residue decay.
- Crop growth
- Nutrients - Nitrogen and Phosphorus
- Pesticides - Gleams technology for simulating pesticide transport by
runoff, percolate, soil evaporation and sediment was added to SWAT.
- Agricultural Management - Tillage and residue management and
Irrigation.
- Routing component - Channel flood routing, Channel sediment routing,
Channel nutrient and pesticide routing, Reservoir Routing, Reservoir water
balance and routing, Reservoir sediment routing, Reservoir nutrient and
pesticides.
AVSWAT (ARC View-SWAT Interface)
Use of a basin scale model like SWAT
needs great amount of time, expertise and cost for acquiring input data, running
the model and analyzing the results. Due to the intrinsic spatial-temporal
variability of watersheds, GIS technology is an essential and efficient method
of collecting, storing and retrieving input data required for simulation models.
GIS can elucidate landscape characteristics (e.g. topography, soil, climate,
land cover and management) and effects of agricultural activities overlaying
intrinsic hydrological attributes.
Considering the above, a user-
friendly, PC based tool, AVSWAT has been developed at the Blackland Research
Center integrating SWAT and ArcView GIS version 3.0a software along with Spatial
Analyst version 1.1 extension.
The SWAT-ArcView interface is a tight
coupling between a model and GIS (Burrough, 1995). The export of data from GIS
to the SWAT model and the return of results for display are accomplished by
Avenue routines that are addressed directly by the interactive tools of GIS
(e.g. setting up parameter values via customized menus) and the exchange of data
is fully automatic. Figure 3 shows the overview of the tight coupling between
SWAT and ArcView GIS. The SWAT ArcView system consists of 3 key components: (1)
preprocessor generating subbasin topographic parameters and model input
parameters; (2) editing input data set and execute simulation; (3) postprocessor
viewing graphical and tabular results.
System/Software
Requirements
- Microsoft Windows 95 or NT 4.0 operating system with minimum 100 MB hard
disk space.
- Arc View 3.0a
- Spatial Analyst Extension 1.1
- Dialog Designer Extension 3.0a.
The Study AreaIn the
present study, the Chhatna block of Bankura (Fig. 4) has been selected for
detailed study. Chhatna lies between 23 Degrees 11 Minutes and 23 degrees 30
Minutes north latitude, and between 86 Degrees 48 Minutes and 87 Degrees 2
Minutes east longitude. Total geographical area of the block is 448.1 sq km.
There are total 288 mouzas in the block. There are five main drainages or
streams within the the block, from north to south they are Gandheswari,
Darakeshwar, Kansachara, Arkasa and Chagalkuta. The district though having an
average rainfall of 1300 mm are considered as drought- prone , because of poor
water management.
Information Need Assessment for Watershed
Management
In order to develop such a SDSS for watershed management ,
initially a workshop was organized with the official ls of the district line
departments involved in watershed management activities . The objectives of such
interaction were to assess the information need of the user departments in this
sector and sensitise them about such tools. Apart from this, all the schemes
pertinent to watershed management were also scurtinised to assess the
information need for them. On such exercise, it emanated that for district-level
watershed programmes basic information products expected out of such tools are:
- Maps of watersheds with sub-watershed within administrative boundaries.
- Maps showing estimates of available water or water yield from such
watersheds or sub-watersheds for planning of proper water management.
- Maps showing estimates of silt yield from such units for prioritization of
watersheds or sub-watersheds for soil conservation works.
AVSWAT was
implemented with the data collected from different sources to generate the above
products to show its utility in watershed management programmes.
Running SWAT through the Arcview- SWAT interface (AVSWAT) using Chhatna
data. Using the input maps and data files as discussed in Fig.3 for the
study area AVSWAT was run through the interface.
Watreshed delineation was
started by using the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) grid and then removing any
depression.. Then drainage network was delineated with a threshold value of 100
as it was found to be optimum for defining minimum numbers of cells to start
delineating a stream. After the drainage network was delineated , the Chhatna
boundary theme was added to the view and overlaid on the drainage network (Fig.
5).
The outlet point for
delineating each watershed was selected by adding or deleting point(s) on the
main stream intersecting the block boundary. Then, sub-basins and watersheds
were delineated (Fig. 6) to generate watershed map for the Chhatna block .
The numbers of watersheds delineated for different sub-basins are as
follows:
Gandheswari - 11
Darakeshwar - 15
Kansachara - 9
Arkasa -
3
Chhagalkuta - 3 It is seen that some of the watersheds are beyond
the block boundaries as they are a hydrological unit and not restricted to
administrative boundary. Since land use and soil data was not available for the
present study beyond the block boundary, while delineating the watersheds it was
kept in mind so that each of the watersheds at least partially fall within the
block boundary.