|
|
|
AVSWAT- a Spatial Decision Support System for Land and water management and its application for watershed management in Bankura district of West Bengal
Applications
developed for Watershed management in Bankura.
Water yield and
silt yield maps for the watersheds in Chhatna Block Water
yield is the amount of water that leaves the sub-basin and contributes to
stream flow at the sub-basin outlet. it is the sum of surface runoff, lateral
flow in the root zone, and ground water flow minus transmission losses in
channels within the sub-basin minus any pond abstractions. Sediment
yield is the sediment from a sub-basin that reaches the sub-basin outlet.
This is the amount that would be measured at the sub-basin outlet (pond
deposition has already been subtracted). Sediment yield is computed for
each sub-basin with the Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) (Williams
and Berndt, 1977).
Maps Generation
- After watershed delineation, soil and land use grid themes were overlaid and
Hydrological Response Unit (HRU) were defined on the basis of homogeneity of
soil and land use. Then each watershed was linked to the nearest meteorological
station. Subsequently, input files required for running SWAT were generated by
using AVSWAT and then SWAT was run through the interface.
- For each of the projects, selecting the Read results option of
Simulation pull down menu, brought a tiled result window containing . bsb, .
rch, output map and the project window .
- Theme in the output map was converted into silt yield and water yield shape
files. These shape files were added in two new views named silt yield and water
yield and view properties were properly set. From legend editor, Unique
value legend type was selected and then WYLD and SYLD fields
were selected to generate the water yield and silt yield theme for each
sub-basin respectively and converted into shape files.
- The water yield and silt yield shape files of five different sub-basins were
added in two different new views and the Chhatna block boundary was overlaid on
each of them. Then layouts were made to prepare the final maps (Fig.7 and 8).
Potential Crop
production map for the Gandheswari watershed in Chhatna Block . SWAT
utilizes a single plant growth model to simulate all types of land covers. The
model is able to differentiate between annual and perennial plants. Annual
plants grow from the planting date to the harvest date or until the accumulated
heat units equal the potential heat units for the plant. Perennial plants
maintain their root systems throughout the year, becoming dormant after frost.
They resume growth when the average daily air temperature exceeds the minimum,
or base, temperature required. The plant growth model is used to assess removal
of water and nutrients from the root zone, transpiration, and biomass/yield
production. The potential increase in plant biomass on a given day is defined as
the increase in biomass under ideal growing conditions. The potential increase
in biomass for a day is a function of intercepted energy and the plant's
efficiency in converting energy to biomass. Energy interception is estimated as
a function of solar radiation and the plant’s leaf area index. The potential
yield is estimated by multiplying the potential biomass production with Harvest
Index i.e. Economic yield/ Biological yield. In the present study SWAT
was implemented for estimating the potential production of Aman paddy, which is
the main crop of the area. The Basi.. sbs file which contains HRU wise
estimate of potential biomass production and crop yield for a sub-basin or
watershed was converted into Basi.dbf and imported into the project It was then
joined to the attribute table of the water yield map. From legend editor, Unique
value legend type was selected and then the field for Total Crop production was
selected to generate the crop production theme for each sub-basin respectively
and converted into shape files. A map for potential production of Aman paddy for
the Gandheswari sub-basin is in Fig.9.
Application of the SDSS for Watershed Management.
In view of the stress on district level planning in the country, watershed
based planning of natural resources is becoming increasingly important activity
in a district. For watershed management, the foremost application of a SDSS like
AVSWAT is in digitally delineating the watersheds and sub-watersheds , at
present which is entirely dependent on the experience and skill of the district
officials. The initial investment in digital data generation justifies
subsequent lesser investment in repeated survey for the purpose and improvement
in watershed delineation.
In a SDSS like AVSWAT, the SWAT model provides
the capability of quantitatively simulating land and water related processes
important for watershed management like potential water and silt yield . The
spatial representation of the results in the form of maps provides added
information to the Decision-makers. The silt yield map presents potential silt
production rate from different watersheds, thus, depicts the erosion status of
them and helps in prioritizing the watersheds for soil and water conservation
measures. Similarly, the water yield map presents the amount of water that can
be available from each watershed under different management options, thus can
help in land use planning, water management planning and in deciding proper land
and water management options. A potential crop production map along with the
other two maps could be of immense help in crop management and land use planning
Apart of producing these static spatial representations, the SWAT model
helps in generating alternate management scenarios for land and water management
by changing the values of input parameters. Thus, providing a dynamic tool to
the decision-makers involved in watershed management programmes in a district.
The SDSS along with the products were demonstrated to the district level
decision-makers through a workshop organized at Bankura district.
References
- Arnold, J.G., J.R. Williams, and D.R. Maidment. 1995. A continuous-time
watershed sediment routing model for large basins. ASCE J. Hydr. Eng.
- Burrough, P.A. 1995. Opportunities and limitations of GIS-based modeling
of solute transport at the regional scale. In: Applications of GIS to the
Modeling of Non-Point Source Pollutants in the Vadose Zone, ASA-CSSA-SSSA
Bouyoucos Conference, Mission Inn, Riverside, CA, May 1-3, 1995.
- Densham, P.J., and M.F. Goodchild. 1988. Spatial decision support
systems: A research agency. GIS/LIS’88 Proceedings Volume No.2 Bethesda,
Maryland: American Congress on Surveying and Mapping. November December 2,
1988.
- Di Luzio, M., R. Srinivasan and J.G. Arnold. 1997. An Integrated User
Interface for SWAT Using ArcView and Avenue. Presented at the August 1997 Annual
International Meeting of ASAE in Minneapolis. Paper No 972235, pp. 15.
- Goodchild, M.F. 1993. Data models and data quality: Problems and
prospects. In Environmental modelling with GIS, ed. M.F. Goodchild, B.O.Parks,
and Steyaert, 8-15. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Goodchild, M.F., L.T.Steyaert, B.O. Parks, C. Johnston, D. Maidment, M.
Crane, and S. Glendening. 1996. GIS and environmental modelling: Progress and
research issues, ed. M.F.Goodchild, L.T.Steyaert, B.O.Parks, C. Johnston, D.
Maidment, M. Crane, and S. Glendening. Fort Collins, Collins, Colorado: GIS
World Publication.
- Nelson, J.E., N.L. Jones and C. Smemoe. 1997. From a Grid or Coverage to
a Hydrograph: Unlocking Your GIS Data for Hydrologic Applications. Proc of ESRI
User Conference 1997, pp. 12.
- Singh, V.P., and M.Fiorentino. 1996. Geographical information systems in
hydrology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Smedema, L.K, and D.W. Rycroft. 1983. Land Drainage -- Planning and
Design of Agricultural Drainage Systems. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY. 376
pp.
- Srinivasan, R. and J.G. Arnold. 1993. Integration of a basin scale water
quality model with GIS. Water Resources Bulletin (Accepted for publication).
- Watkins, D.W., and D.C.Mckinney. 1995. Recent developments associated
with decision support systems in water resources. Reviews of Geophysics
(Supplement), July, 941-948.
- Williams, J.R. and H.D. Berndt. 1977. Sediment yield prediction based on
watershed hydrology.
- Trans .ASAE 20(6): 1100-1104.
|
|
|