Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 3
| Next |


Groundwater modeling of unconfined aquifer system of crystalline area - a case study in Lapsiya watershed, Hazaribagh, India

Ashok Kumar
Earth Resource Division
Remote Sensing Application Centre
IGSC- Planetarium, Patna - 800 001, India
Tele# +91-612-689001, Mobile# +91-9875036588
Ashok_bcst@yahoo.com / groundwater@indiatimes.com
Web: http://www/geocities.com/ashok_bcst


In the India considerably large geographical area comes under crystalline area. Groundwater occurrence and its management are the major task before the scientists and planner. These area experiences acute crisis of groundwater for drinking water and irrigation. In these areas due unconfined nature of aquifer system, the storage and retrieval of groundwater is major task before the scientists. The weathered materials are the principal aquifer system and ground water occurs under water table condition. Beneath the weathered horizon, fractures system within the basement surface is also supposed to be potential aquifer zone. But determination of fracture geometry is difficult task and these fractures zone have not been fully exploited. It has been established that aquifer geometry of the unconfined aquifer system is important parameters in understanding the groundwater storage, retrieval and recharge process in aquifer. The Digital Surface Terrain Modeling (DSTM) and Digital Basement Terrain Modeling (DBTM) exercise provides the upper and lower limit of the unconfined weathered aquifer system (Kumar et. al., 1997). This approach has been well tested in identifying the groundwater retrieval and storage sites in Chotanagpur region of India. But for complete understanding the complex mechanism of groundwater, this approach is not sufficient. The long term planning and management of groundwater needs understanding groundwater interaction with surface water, recharge, seepaze process, intake and rate of withdrawal in space and time and its long term effect on the aquifer system to achieve the sustainability. The entire exercise becomes complex process and it is outside preview of static modeling exercise such as DBTM approach. Several attempts have been made through computer modeling in alluvial plain of India but less stress has been made for the modeling of the aquifer in hard rock area.

In present study, modeling exercise has been attempted in Lapasiya watershed, Hazaribagh, India. It has helped in understanding the behavior of unconfined aquifer system with various varying input parameters. The outcome of the model helped in identifying suitable area for groundwater augmentation on the long term. The present model also helped in optimization of rate of new wells. The model has simulated up to a level to the near real field condition. The present modeling exercise and its results has given enough scope for taking up such types exercise in other parts of hard rock of India. There is still possibility for further refinement of various parameters. The present modeling exercise is a parts of UNDP training programme and it may not been treated as final.

Groundwater Modeling 
Modeling is an attempt to replicate the behaviors of natural groundwater or hydrologic system by defining the essential features of the system in some controlled physical or mathematical manner. Modeling plays an extremely important role in the management of hydrologic and groundwater system.

Objective of Modeling in Case Study 
  1. The first objective of model was to simulate the condition similar to aquifer behaviors with time. The water table or equi-potential surface remains near to the surface after the monsoon; water table starts falling down from Nov. onwards and reaches maximum depth in the month of May/ June. After onset of monsoon, water table comes up.

  2. To budget the groundwater resources

  3. Find out the suitable area for bore well development and optimization of pumping rate and duration. In study area, 20 deep bore well have been identified through geo-hydrological and geophysical survey. But it sustainability could not be determined on long term basis.

  4. To determine the sensitivity of the model the various input parameters i.e. recharge/ evapo-transpiration, hydraulic conductivity. So more stresses should be given in collection of field data.
Data required for the modeling and its source
Data Required by Model Source of Data
System Geometry Boundaries, elevations, thickness, surface drainage, bore location Geological Map Boundaries
Hydraulic Properties Hydraulic conductivity, Transimissivity, Anisotropy, Leakge Geophysical Surveys Sections, thickness, bed rock, Digital Basement Terrain Model (DBTM)
Storage Properties Specific yield, storage coefficient Drilling Logs Aquifers, Aquitards, Thickness, Bed rock
Sources and Sinks Recharge, Pumpage, Leakage, Underflow, Baseflow, Evapotransipiration Pump Tests Transimissivity, Storage coeffecient, Leakage
Piezometric Heads Water levels, Current and historical Bore Records Census, Location, Pumpage, Schedule, Hydrographs
Transport Properties Porosity, Strengths, Constituents, Radioactivity Surface Hydrology Stream stage, Losses, Flood maps, Drainage, Baseflow, Channels
Concentration Current and Historical Meteorology Rainfall, Evapotranspiration
Chemistry Water analyses, Clay samples, Concentration maps Water Use Irrigation, Industrial, Urban, Efficiency, Waste, Backup source
Land Use Soil map, Infiltration, Crop type Piezometric Surfaces Pre-pumping, Current, Short term drawdown, each aquifer, Hydraulic gradient

Ground-Water Flow Equation
The partial-differential equation of ground-water flow used in MODFLOW is (McDonald and Harbaugh,1988)



where 

Kxx , K yy , and K zz are values of hydraulic conductivity along the x, y, and z coordinate axes, which are assumed to be parallel to the major axes of hydraulic conductivity (L/T);

h is the potentiometric head (L);

W is a volumetric flux per unit volume representing sources and/or sinks of water, with W<0.0 for flow out of the ground-water system, andW>0.0 for flow in (T-1);

SS is the specific storage of the porous material (L-1); and t is time (T).

Study Area
The Lapasiya watershed (AIS & LUS , 1988) is a part of Upper Hazaribagh plateau and forms the 500-600 (above m.s.l.) meters erosion surface. On the whole the plain is undulating with some minor ridges interrupting the level nature topography. The area may be termed as buried pediplain. The cover material is formed by coarse alluvium in the immediate valley of streams while rest of the pediplain has a gravely ferruginous soil. The porosity of soil does not permit wetting of the topsoil and the water rapidly percolates to the lower horizons. The present study area is a part of upper Hazribagh plateau. The watershed has total areal extent of 85 sq. km. Area on average receives 1322.41 mm of rainfall.

Surface Water Resource
Total 55 water bodies mostly ponds/ tanks have been identified in the watershed with the help of remotely sensed data. In which “Charwa” dam are the major water body and its areal extent are approximately 100 ha. The entire water bodies nearly harvest 8-10 % of the total annual rainfall (Kumar, 1997). 

Land Utilization
Kharif (paddy crops) including current fallow, water body, settlements etc covers 67.43 percent of watershed whereas rabi crop covers 07.43 per cent of the watershed area. The areal extent of rabi crops is indicator of utilization status of surface and ground water (Kumar, 1997). 

Aquifer System 
Thick weathered material serves as potential aquifers. In the valley portion water table generally cuts the topographic surface and groundwater get lost as seepage (spring). Water table in the valley portion ranges between 2.00m to 3.0m b.g.l. and generally deep on the upland in the range of 4 to 10m b.g.l. (Kumar, 1997). It has been observed that in case of maximum thickness of saturated weathered horizon of phreatic aquifer about 12m, yield of the dug wells range from 1.0m3 to 2.5m3 / day for a draw down of 0.5m to 3.00 m and well recuperates within 2 to 24 hr. Specific capacity of the aquifer varies from 1.39 to 5.61 lpm/m. draw down for the hilly areas having thin mantle of weathered material and 3.12 to 8.54 lpm/m draw down to low lying areas underlain by thick weathered material and soil covers. It has been observed that 70 per cent of total groundwater reserves get lost as base flow in river (Bhattacharya , 1990 ).

Page 1 of 3
| Next |