Landuse Mapping
Landuse map has been prepared from digital
analysis of satellite data using Earth Resources Data Analysis System (ERDAS)
Imagine 8.3.1. For generation of landuse map of the area, IRS-1C LISS-III data
and PAN data of scene 96/50 for November 1997 was used. Since the area of
watershed is small, the LISS-III scene was merged with PAN scene after carrying
out geometric corrections on both of the scenes. The merged scene was re-sampled
at 6-metre pixel resolution to get multi-spectral information at 6-metre
resolution. Seven classes of landuse i.e. agriculture, fallow, irrigated
agriculture, forest, shrubs, open scrub, shrubs and wasteland have been
identified in the watershed. Landuse statistics of the watershed is given in
Table 2.
Table 2. Present landuse statistics of Danda
watershed
| Sl. No. |
Landuse |
Area (Ha) |
Area (%) |
| 1. |
Agriculture |
95.83 |
21.27 |
| 2. |
Fallow |
11.73 |
2.60 |
| 3. |
Forest |
103.94 |
23.08 |
| 4. |
Agriculture (irrigated) |
26.04 |
5.78 |
| 5. |
Shrubs |
25.61 |
5.68 |
| 6. |
Waste land |
94.43 |
20.97 |
| 7. |
Open scrub |
92.43 |
20.52 |
Soil Mapping
In Garhwal area, the majority of soils are
diluvial in nature. Most of the agricultural soils usually lose the top horizon
either due to construction of terraces or erosion. In the terraced hillside, the
downslope drift of mineral matter is sharply reduced and the soil is stabilised.
On steep slopes, soils are generally shallow and usually have a thin surface
horizon and medium to coarse texture. Sub-soils are deep and heavily textured.
Top surface horizon with a high content of organic matter is a characteristic
feature of the area. These soils are highly leached and acidic in nature. Valley
soils are developed from the colluvium brought down from the upslopes. Soils of
the valley bottom on river terraces comprise of alluvium, brought and deposited
by rivers in the process of aggradation.
Soil map of the area is derived from supervised classification
of the satellite data in conjunction with limited field data collected from
field visits and general information collected from the villagers, and the block
office.
Analysis
Quantitative analysis of drainage networks
The linking
of the geomorphological parameters with the hydrological characteristics of the
basin provides a simple way to understand the hydrologic behaviour of the
different basins particularly of the ungauged basins. Before taking up the
studies related with hydrologic simulations using the geomorphologic
characteristics, the important geomorphological properties have to be quantified
from the available topographical map of the basin. The geomorphological
properties which are important from the hydrological studies point of view
include the linear, aerial and relief aspect of the watersheds. Detailed
definitions and description of various geomorphological parameters can be found
in Chow (1964) and Singh (1992).
The mapping of drainage pattern can be carried out using
satellite data. Computation of the parameters required for morphometric analysis
using manual methods like area measurement using dot grid method or using
planimeter and length measurement using curvimeter are very tedious and time
consuming. It is more difficult if the map is on higher scale like 1:50,000 and
1:25,000. The ordering, lengths, area and perimeter etc. can be easily estimated
using Geographic Information System (GIS) technique. Use of GIS can not only
make this task relatively easy but accurate as well. For quantification of
various geomorphological parameters of Danda watershed, the digitised drainage
and interpolated contours maps were used. Important parameters thus derived by
GIS analysis are listed in Table 3.
Table 3. Geomorphological parameters of Danda watershed
| Sl. No. |
Parameter |
Symbol |
Value |
Unit |
| 1. |
No. of stream of order 1 |
N1 |
21 |
|
| 2. |
No. of stream of order 2 |
N2 |
6 |
| 3. |
No. of stream of order 3 |
N3 |
1 |
| 4. |
Mean length of order 1 |
 |
563.56 |
Meter |
| 5. |
Mean length of order 2 |
 |
646.22 |
Meter |
| 6. |
Mean length of order 3 |
 |
1359.75 |
Meter |
| 7. |
Mean area of order 1 |
 |
16.70 |
Hectare |
| 8. |
Mean area of order 2 |
 |
14.69 |
Hectare |
| 9. |
Mean area of order 3 |
 |
29.72 |
Hectare |
| 10 |
Total watershed area |
A |
450.44 |
Hectare |
| 11. |
Watershed perimeter |
P |
11.74 |
Km |
| 12. |
Total length of streams of all order |
Lw |
17.07 |
Km |
| 13. |
Drainage density |
D |
3.637 |
Km/km2 |
| 14. |
Stream frequency |
F |
5.97 |
1/km2 |
| 15. |
Form factor |
Rf |
0.0161 |
Dimensionless |
| 16. |
Circularity ratio |
Rc |
0.856 |
Dimensionless |
| 17. |
Elongation ration |
RE |
0.887 |
Dimensionless |
| 18. |
Bifurcation ratio |
RB |
4.581 |
Dimensionless |
| 19. |
Relief ratio |
Rh |
0.337 |
Dimensionless |
| 20. |
Relative relief |
Rp |
0.088 |
Dimensionless |
| 21. |
Ruggedness number |
Rn |
3.753 |
Dimensionless |