Overview |
Urban Sprawl |
Fringe Area Development |
Urban Agglomeration |
Emerging Technologies |
Relevant Links
New Urbanism - An Automated Approach

Mr. Sanket Dinesh Shah
Executive - GIS Analyst
Lavasa Corporation Ltd (An HCC Group Company)
Mail id: sanket.shah@lavasa.com
Synopsis
The concept of New Urbanism has integrated various fields such as
Environment, Engineering and Construction, Urban Planning and Architecture for
planning, execution and sustainable development. These components constitute
the process of urban development and planning and require timely assistance of
GIS to ensure accuracy as well as ease of operation.
In such a demanding environment, catering to spatial needs accurately
and promptly is a measure of the capability of GIS. Once the process is defined,
human intervention is mostly monotonous up to the supervisory level. Most of
these processes can be customized for faster execution enabling better resource
utilization.
This paper presents the development of the architecture of a unified
application, accommodating the various processes used frequently at Lavasa. It
discusses in detail a tool developed to categorize, convert and automatically
update surveyed data from a total positioning station (TPS). The primary
intention of developing such an application was to introduce ease of converting
volumes of raw survey data into GIS. The designed tool assists GIS
professionals and non GIS users to ensure accuracy in converting voluminous
data in a limited amount of time, thus enhancing managerial decisions.
1.Introduction
1.1 About Lavasa
Lavasa Corporation Limited was formed to undertake a large scale
lifestyle development in India. Based on new urbanism principles, and located
near city of Pune in the state of Maharashtra, India, a township is being
developed over a sprawling area of approximately 10,000 acres.
The project area lies between the latitudes 18 º 26’ 33’’ and 18 º 21’ 16’’
North and longitudes 73 º 25’ 13’’ and 73 º 37’ 18’’ East. Lavasa is located on the
backwaters of Warasgaon dam on the Western Ghats between Pune and
Mumbai.
At such a large scale of development the individual aspects of planning,
execution and decision making deploy various challenges. GIS holds the
capacity of synchronizing these activities through its capability to handle huge
amounts of spatial data, providing user friendly visualizations and facilitating
faster analysis.
1.2 GIS at Lavasa
Spatial data for the entire project is managed using an spatial database
engine (SDE) which incorporates enterprise GIS architecture. The spatial inputs
are received from various sources ranging from AutoCAD designs to raw total
station points.
Presently the GIS database acts as a central repository for all enterprise
level data. Analysis and decision making are derived from the GIS database and
hence accurate conversion, storing and frequent updating are very crucial steps
which are followed.
Spatial Data from these sources carries discrepancies which do not allow
accurate transformation into a GIS. Hence methodologies include constant
topological checks before updating in the SDE.
1.3 Present Scenario
Survey data collection in a topographically challenging environment like
Lavasa is a tedious process. In many cases it is not possible to collect data in a
sequential form due to various factors such as visibility of station points, time
constraints in completing surveys etc.
To maintain data standards and processes, the data collected, has to
undergo a series of quality procedures which are as follows:
- Total station survey generated points in a CSV (Comma Separated Value)
format which has following fields:
X, Y and Z - Precision of these values is up to 5 decimal places.
Description -It indicates the abbreviation used to denote the attribute
information. For ex. Road center is denoted as RC, Road Edge as RE etc
Date – Date on which survey has taken place (mmddyy)
- CSV file imported into different layers in a consolidated ACAD drawing file
based upon the description field.
- Line features are created using these point features.
- The surveyor then exports these features into a shape file where all the
required fields are verified.
- This data becomes a part of an external geodatabase whose schema is a
replica of the enterprise GIS data used at Lavasa.
- A series of topology checks are carried out to ensure data integrity and its
compliance to standards.
- After successful topology check and editing, the data is uploaded to the SDE.
1.4 Drawbacks
In the above process it is seen that the time taken to import CSV files to
the different layers of ACAD file, involves ample amount of time. Further
digitization process may result in for error which account to the data inaccuracy.
Earlier trials of correcting these errors infer that the amount of time correcting
these errors is almost equal to the time of regenerating the data manually.
To ease this monotonous process, automated tools were proposed to be
developed with the help of ArcGIS desktop using VBA.
2. Survey Data Conversion Tool (SDCT)

Figure 1. SDCT view in ArcMap.
Process description
This tool converts the CSV file to a staging Geodatabase. It creates
different Feature Classes and sorts according to the ‘Description’ field in CSV
files.
As mentioned in the section 1.3, the various steps of converting data in an
ACAD environment namely : Importing to CAD, organizing layers, Joining points,
exporting to shape and converting to geodatabase are now done in an
automated environment in the order : Organize data as per description, join
points and export to geodatabase directly. Figure 2 Demonstrates the difference
in the two methods.
The basic challenge while developing this tool was the method in which
data is collected. Most of the times it is random point collection due to lesser
visibility, lack of time, bad weather conditions etc. but the survey team ensures
proper and complete collection of features. Due to such a crude method of data
collection, it became difficult to join the points based on their FID (which is the
sequence in which the data is collected). Hence the logical answer to sorting
these points was to generate a unique ID for each feature as per their occurrence
on ground. This was fulfilled using the distance between the two points as the
source of ID generation.
It was expected that the program would encounter cases where this logic
would not provide proper results, but out of the total conversions done, this logic
still holds good.
Comparison of Existing methodology Vs Automated methodology

Figure2. Process flows for manual and automated survey data updation
Both the processes are similar to each other to a number of steps, but the time taken and the human involvement reduces manifold due to the automated work flow.
3. Conclusion
Timeline comparison for Existing process Vs Automated process

*Taking CSV file for the 200 point features
As we can see in the above chart, total time taken by the existing method
is 10 minutes while time taken by the automated method is 35 seconds.
This tool has reduced the total time in conversion of the data by around 17
times also ensuring the accuracy of the data. The comparison sheet between
these two processes is shown in the concluding section. Thus the automated
method delivers more precise results within fractions of seconds.
4. Future Scope
Lavasa GIS caters to all departments who use data in a spatial context.
Various processes are repetitive and time consuming in nature. The present tool
is limited to line features. It will complete when there will be successful
conversion of polygon features.
This tool is the part of a complex software system envisioned to
encompass various such tools used daily. It is proposed to create a object
oriented flexible toolset which will be used across the organization by everyone,
thus decreasing the barriers between GIS and non GIS professionals in the
organization.
Page 1 of 1