Home > Geospatial Application Papers > Urban Planning > Overview

Overview | Urban Sprawl | Fringe Area Development | Urban Agglomeration | Emerging Technologies | Relevant Links




IRS-1B based FCC image interpretation for land use and land cover mapping: An expert system approach


Accordingly, the knowledge base has been developed here too. Three layers of sections for each land use and land category occurring in table1 have been used. These are shown in the fig2, which represents screen shot of the section tree. The rules in each section are arranged in the first come first serve sequence that decides flow of control among the sections. The firing of a rule in any section is governed by the related parameters. All types of parameters have been used in developing knowledge base as per the design requisition. The section consult again represents end of session and can direct control, on user’s response, such that it become possible to do consultation for all land use & land cover types in sequence in each session, otherwise, it needs to start re-consultation for each type. In order to tackle the uncertainty related with any Boolean parameter (when a user responses as Unknown to a question ) multilevel dialog has been designed so that user become aware with what is being asked by the system. The top level of dialog uses standard scientific terms and on each lower level effort has been made to simplify the terms. The declaration field of each parameter contains proper explanation for HOW type explanation while the explanation field contains the explanation to the question related to parameters. Each parameter contains picture name in the picture field, which displayed during consultation. Pictures are stored in picture database in BMP format. On the picture displayed with question of parameter, the land use land cover type has been specified using hotspot editor. Current version of ESTA allows use of picture in the title, parameter, in advice and in action list. However it has been found essential in, some places, to include pictures in explanation. This has been achieved by directing control flow in the advice and pictures have been used to make easier understanding the question. Such an example is shown in fig 3 where the user selects help option. This drives the system in advice window, as shown in the screen shot of fig.4, where the user gets option to see more interpreted FCC images to develop idea about visual image interpretation. The developed knowledge base has been stored in compiled format to optimize the performance

Fig. 4: A Screen shot in response to fig.3
Fig. 4: A Screen shot in response to fig.3

Consultation and Result
The consultation with the system can be initiated by loading knowledge base in memory. ESTA allows only one knowledge base at a time. As the programme runs ESTA goes in start section and looks for the rules. It asks question related to parameters in ESTA Consult window It executes rules in order of the arrangement. The parameter Land Cover places menu of all the land cover and land use types from where user can choose any one and accordingly, the control is transferred to the related section at the second level. At the second level image interpretation is done. User gets here decision of system in advice window. However, as shown in screen shot of fig. 4, the advice window has been also used to provide help on question using additional figures for aforesaid reasons. The interpretation rules in the sections, at second level, have been placed in first come first serve sequence. These sequences have been logically arranged keeping in view minimizing the situation of conflict, which is very common in image interpretation [22]. However, this does not provide strong strategy to overcome the problem of conflict resolution.

Fig. 4: Standard FCC image taken by IRS - 13
Fig. 4: Standard FCC image taken by IRS - 13

In the present work two FCC images, taken by IRS- 1D & IRS-1B satellites, of Hajipur area of district of Vaishali of Bihar have been used for the purpose of identification of the land use/land cover. The photographs shown in fig.6 and fig.7 have been taken in the Oct. 1998 by IRS-IB & in May 1999 by IRS-ID respectively, in the same spectral bands. The FCC taken by IRS-1D is based on the data collected by multispectral LISS III sensor. It is relatively high resolution image .It has been used here to see the temporal variation in the area. These two images are of same area, Vaishli district in Bihar, India, and is shown in fig 8 (from www.mapsindia.com) but are taken in different season. Thus by comparing the two images several land use/land cover showing temporal variation like permanent water logging area, temporary water logging area etc have been detected. The identified land use/ land cover areas have also been presented in fig.9.No evidence of snow and hilly area has been found. In the course of interpretation the user can learn the visual image interpretation skill by going through the rules used by the system. The result of the system is satisfactory at the macroscopic level.

Fig. 5: Standard FCC image taken by Satellite IRS - 1D
Fig. 5: Standard FCC image taken by Satellite IRS - 1D

Conclusion & future work
It may be concluded that the knowledge acquisition, analysis and their structuring to develop knowledge-based rule is major work in this presentatation. Testing the knowledge base and do required correction is relatively smaller part of the work. The system is capable in doing classification at the first level of USGS land use & land cover classification scheme. The developed system is promising and encouraging. It helps in illustrating the major concepts of visual image interpretation and similar system development. The system can be used by the beginners to learn visual image interpretation of the FCC image. The knowledge base of the system stores rule in first come first serve sequence. This is not very strong resolution for conflicts that often arises in the FCC image interpretation. However, by assigning some priority value to each rule in compliance with the human expert’s view stronger conflict resolution can be achieved, as it is independent of ordering of rules. Also the picture base of the system is required to have more interpreted images to make the system useful for lay users. In order to make system more useful it is recommended to integrate digital techniques also. As in the coming decades the need of on screen interpretation of high-resolution satellite image is likely to increase [16], the knowledge base for high-resolution image interpretation can be developed in the same way.

Fig. 6: Location of Vaishali district in Bihar
Fig. 6: Location of Vaishali district in Bihar

Acknowledgement
This work was supported by CSIR, NewDelhi. We would also like to thanks to Bihar Remote Sensing Center Patna, for technical support and advice.

Fig. 7: Representation of identified Land use & Land covers (for fig. 4)
Fig. 7: Representation of identified Land use and Land covers (for fig. 4)

References
  • Estes, J. E., Hajic, E. J. and L. R. Tinney, (1983). Chapter 24:Fundamentals of Image Analysis: Analysis of Visible and Thermal Infrared Data, Manual of Remote Sensing, American Society for Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, Bethesda, pp. 987-1124. (1)
  • Jensen J. R.( 2000). Remote Sensing of The Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 544 p. (2)
  • Philipson, W. (1997). Manual of Photographic Interpretation. American Society for Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, Bethesda, 830 p. (3)
  • Short, N.M., (1999). The Remote Sensing Tutorial, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center. On line http://rst.gcfc.nasa.gov/Front/tofc.html (4)
  • Estes, J. E. and J. R. Jensen, (1998). Chapter 10: Development of Remote Sensing Digital Image Processing and Raster GIS, The History of Geographic Information Systems: Perspectives from the Pioneers, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Saddle river, NJ, pp. 163-180. (5)
  • Jensen, J. R., (1996). Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 318 p. (6)
  • Deekshatulu, B.L.(1991) “Management of Natural Resources -Use of AI,” In AI and Expert System Technology in Indian Context”, Ed. By V.V. Sharma, Deekshatulu, Vishwandhan, TMH, New Delhi. (7)
  • Kowalaski R.A., 1982" Prolog as Logic Programming Language,” Proceedings of AICA Congress, Pavia, Italy. (8)
  • Ramani, K. & Gautum, N.C., 1990 “ Expert System, for Identification of Land Use/Land Cover Categories from Satellite Data”, Proceedings of the Seminar on AI, Expert System & Knowledge Based System, ISRO Hqts., Bangalore, India. (9)
  • Rao, D.P. (1991). Management of Natural Resources using Expert System Preliminary Result of Some Case Study, Expert system Technology in Indian Context Ed. by V.V. Sharma, Deekshatulu, Vishwandhan, TMH, New Delhi. (10)
  • McKeown, D., Wilson, A. & McDermott, J. (1985). Rule-Based Interpretation of Aerial Imagery. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 7(5): 570{585. (11)
  • Clement, V., Giraudon, G., Houzelle, S. & Sadakly, F. (1993). Interpretation of Remotely Sensed Images in a Context of Multisensor Fusion Using a Multispecialist Architecture.IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 31(4): 779{791. (12)
  • Liedtke, C.-E., Buckner, J., Grau, O., Growe, S. & Tonjes, R. (1997). AIDA: A Systemfor the Knowledge Based Interpretation of Remote Sensing Data. 3rd Int. Airborne Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition, 313{320, Copenhagen, Denmark. (13)
  • Niemann, H., Sagerer, G., Schroder, S. & Kummert, F. (1990). ERNEST: A semanticNetwork System for Pattern Understanding. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis andMachine Intelligence 12(9): 883{905. (14)
  • Matsuyama, T. & Hwang, V.S.-S. (1990). SIGMA: A Knowledge-Based Aerial Image Understanding System. New York: Plenum Press, p. 277. (15)
  • Jensen J. R., F. Qiu and Patterson K, (2001), A Neural Network Image nterpretation System to Extract Rural and Urban Land Use and Land Cover Information from Remote Sensor Data, Geocarto International, Vol 16,No.1, Hong Kong. (16)
  • Luger, George, F.& Stubblifield, A.(1983), “Artificial Intelligence: Structures and Strategies for Compex Problem Solving. “ The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc. California, 2nd Edition. (17)
  • Al-garni, A.M., Al-sari (1994) Remote Sensing Geology and Expert System, ASPRS/ACSM, Annual Convention & Exposition, Baltimore, Vol.1, pp47-59. (18)
  • Introduction to ESTA (Expert System Shell for Text Animation), Prolog Development Center, Denmark. (19)
  • Thomas, M, & RALPH, W. (1999), “Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation” (20)
  • John Wiley and Sons, 4th edition, New York.
  • Leung, Y And Leung, K.S. (1993) “ An Intelligent Export System Shell for Knowledge Based Geographical Information System 2, Some Applications, International Journal of Geographical Information System. (21)
  • Pakiarajah, V., Crowther, P., & Hartent, J., Conflict Resolution Techniques for Expert Systems Used to Classify Remotely Sensed Satellite Images, 5th International Conference on GeoComputation, UK. (22)
Page 3 of 3
| Previous |