GISdevelopment >
Policy > Indian Policies >
Technology
Indian |
International | Geographic Information Infrastructure
Applications |
Technology |
Right to Information
Technology
Suggested Approach for Evolving NSDI Standards at Domain Servers
Table 2. Example Attribute code table for landuse/ landcover : luse.lut
(Source : Illustrative codes from NRIS Standards document)
| Code |
Description |
|
| |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Level 4 |
| 01-00-00-00 |
Built-up |
|
|
|
| 01-01-00-00 |
|
Towns/cities (Urban) |
| 01-01-01-00 |
|
|
Residential |
|
| 01-01-02-00 |
|
|
Industrial |
|
| 01-01-02-01 |
|
|
|
Salt pans |
| 01-01-03-00 |
|
|
Commercial |
|
| 01-01-03-01 |
|
|
|
Bus Stands |
| 01-01-03-02 |
|
|
|
Rly Yards |
| 01-02-00-00 |
|
Villages (Rural) |
| 02-00-00-00 |
Agriculture |
| 02-01-00-00 |
|
Crop land |
| 02-01-01-00 |
|
|
Kharif |
| 02-01-02-00 |
|
|
Rabi |
| 02-02-00-00 |
|
Fallow |
| 02-02-01-00 |
|
|
Current Fallow |
| 02-02-02-00 |
|
|
Permanent Fallow |
| 03-00-00-00 |
Forest |
| 03-01-00-00 |
|
Evergreen/ Semi evergreen |
| 03-01-01-00 |
|
|
Dense/ Closed |
| 03-01-02-00 |
|
|
Open |
| 03-02-00-00 |
|
Deciduous (Moist/Dry) |
| 03-02-01-00 |
|
|
Dense/ Closed |
| 03-02-02-00 |
|
|
Open |
| 03-05-00-00 |
|
Shifting cultivation |
| 03-05-01-00 |
|
|
Old Shifting Cultivation |
| 03-05-02-00 |
|
|
Abandon Shifting Cultivation |
| 03-05-03-00 |
|
|
Current Shifting Cultivation |
| 03-06-00-00 |
|
Crop Land in Forest |
| 04-00-00-00 |
Wastelands |
| 04-01-00-00 |
|
Salt Affected Land |
| 04-02-00-00 |
|
Gullied/ Ravenous Land |
| 05-00-00-00 |
Water bodies |
| 05-01-00-00 |
|
River |
| 05-01-01-00 |
|
|
Water channel area |
| 05-01-02-00 |
|
|
Sandy area |
| 05-02-00-00 |
|
Canal |
| 05-08-01-00 |
|
|
Back waters |
| 05-08-02-00 |
|
|
Estuary/ Kayal |
| 05-09-00-00 |
|
Cut-off Meander |
| 07-00-00-00 |
Grass land / Grazing land |
| 07-01-00-00 |
|
Dense |
| 07-02-00-00 |
|
Degraded |
| STRUCTURE OF THE TABLE |
| Field –Name |
Field Type |
Key field(Y/N) |
|
| LU-Code |
8,8,C |
Y |
|
| Discr-L1 |
30,30,C |
N |
|
| Discr-L2 |
30,30,C |
N |
|
| Discr-L3 |
30,30,C |
N |
|
| Discr-L4 |
30,30,C |
N |
|
Database Contents & Naming Conventions
A typical domain database would consist of both spatial and non-spatial data elements. A comprehensive list of data elements both spatial as well as non-spatial form is to be made. While making this list, care has to be taken to minimise the redundancy in the database by identifying the each input element to be a mutually exclusive item. Each of the listed elements has to be associated with specific system names for reference while accessing the database. Furthermore each element will have associated with it an attribute code table (name to be fixed) and a key field (fixed name) linking the spatial element with attribute table. An illustrative list of data elements has been provided in Table-1.
Feature Codification for individual Database Element
Each of the database elements has to follow pre-defined codification scheme. It is suggested to follow hierarchical codification as follows:
- Harmonise Various Mapping Legends prevailing in a particular theme ( e.g. Landuse- Coastal, wastelands,
Forest …)
- Encompass Natural & Administrative hierarchy e.g. Landuse (Level-1,2,3,4), Admn (District, Taluk, Village) Watershed, Sub-watershed …
Advantages of hierarchical codification approach
- Flexible extension of codes - Inclusion of occurrences at any level
- Reduced redundancy & improved integrity by entry of spatial features only at lowest level e.g Villages -> taluk, districts; Micro-watersheds -> mini, sub, ..
- Scope for tie-up with various collateral data sources.
A typical codification for Landuse/ Landcover theme adopted under NRIS is given in Table 2 as an example.
Indian |
International | Geographic Information Infrastructure
Applications |
Technology |
Right to Information
Related Sections
Applications |
Careers |
Education |
Events |
GIS@development |
News |
Publications |
Country Pages |
Technology
|
|
|