Abstract
Global Positioning System (GPS) is the most powerful and wonderful tool in modern day world, which gives position, time and movement, the three degrees of freedom, intimately connected to every individual. GPS can be called Coordinate machine, Navigation machine, Positioning machine, Time machine, Distance machine, Direction machine, Mapping machine and Leveling machine. Does it pose a security risk to individual countries? Did the terrorists use GPS to navigate to the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11? What should be Indian policy towards GPS under these circumstances? GPS also has restriction. P-code is restricted. Selective Availability was removed only on May 2nd 2000. India restricts maps, coordinates, heights, contours, gravity values, digitized maps/data, and many other important surveying and mapping products. Are these restrictions justified? Should these be changed? Are the restrictions transparent? Indian grid and the maps, on which this grid is shown, are restricted. Do these restrictions restrict development? An attempt has been made to examine all these issues in this paper. Introduction United States Department of Defense has given to the world GPS for navigation, positioning and time determination continuously. U. S. Government had put in place intentional restrictions on access to its signals so that accuracy of the system is limited for security considerations. Earlier there was anti-spoofing as well as selective availability (SA) to restrict accuracy of the system. Selective availability has been lifted since May 2, 2000. Anti- spoofing however continues. Accuracy of horizontal position in point positioning mode with a single receiver is limited to 15 to 20 metres, since P-code is not available to civil users. With P-code we can get accuracy of 3 to 5 metres. It is however possible to get better than 1 metre accuracy in position (latitude and longitude) by simultaneously using 2 receivers in relative or differential positioning. If U.S.A., which is the most powerful, has put restrictions for security considerations, it is appropriate that India should also have some restrictions for dissemination of its geo-spatial data. Quote from R. Ramchandran's "Public access to geographical data" is "It only stands to reason that India devise appropriate restrictions to prevent national security-related risks. Of course any such restriction should have a rational basis. Unfortunately in the context of geographical data, the restrictions are perceived to be without much logical basis." Restriction Policy Nobody is fully aware as to what is in fact the Restriction Policy as no such consolidated document is available. If such a document is made available it will end all confusion. It is expected that the Government of India will soon come out with a comprehensive Restriction Policy document in respect of Geo-spatial data capture and distribution, and make it known to the public so that it follows the law of the land that is just and rational and works in the best interests of the country. Restrictions on geo-spatial data are being notified in piecemeal manner through departmental circulars and orders, which are unclear and incomplete. The following is the summary of various restrictions, as the author understands it.
We shall examine restrictions on various data in connection with GPS only. We can get position of any point through GPS observations in a few seconds in latitude, longitude and height above WGS 84 ellipsoid, in WGS 84 datum. The horizontal accuracy with single GPS receiver in stand-alone mode of position is 15 to 20 metres. This means that we can get accuracy of better than 1 second of latitude or longitude. There is however difference between coordinates in Indian system and WGS 84. Transformation parameters are needed to convert coordinates of one system into another. Approximate transformation parameters have been estimated by the Defense Mapping Agency (DMA) of USA. These are integrated with each GPS receiver. We can therefore obtain coordinates in Indian system also with GPS with reduced accuracy but yet up to nearly 20 to 25 metres in most of the cases. It is seen that in most of the cases the coordinates obtained by even hand-held GPS receivers in Indian system vary by not more than 30 metres. The difference may however be even up to 100 metres in the North Eastern region of India. Accuracy of Coordinates of N-E region of India in Indian system, as they are now available is open to question. We can therefore safely conclude that the difference in coordinates between those obtained by GPS receivers in Indian system and those already existing in Indian system does not exceed 30 metres in most cases. It is clear that position can be obtained with GPS receiver to the accuracy of better than 1 second of latitude or longitude in Indian system. We thus see that this is in direct confrontation with restrictions mentioned in previous paragraph under (1) Topographical maps, (2) Position data in latitude and longitude and (12) GPS Receivers. (2) is completely ridiculous as I minute of arc represents nearly 1800 metres. Where do we go from here? Should we restrict import and use of each and every GPS receiver? GPS Receivers and Indian Grid Indian grid is in Lambert Conformal Conic Projection in 9 zones meaning 9 grids. The parameters of these grids i.e. latitude and longitude of origin, central scale factor, assumed (false) value of origin in x&y or E&N are restricted. These grids are superimposed on topographical maps of unrestricted zone also. Such maps are classified as restricted. Rectangular coordinates in these grids are also restricted. It is however seen that GPS receivers available in the market e.g. hand-held Garmin GPS-12 receiver can give coordinates in any of these grids anywhere in India and adjacent countries. This implies that these grids and their parameters are available to GPS manufacturers who have incorporated these into their GPS software so as to directly give coordinates in these grids. This is so as the grids were designed by the British, prior to our independence. The grids are available to the whole world including Pakistan. Actually Pakistan has also adopted the same grids applicable to their areas for their maps. The situation therefore appears to be dangerous. Should we change the grids? The answer is Yes. We have not been able to do this in more than 50 years and 4 wars and continuous proxy war. Let us do it now without any further delay. Further do we restrict the GPS receivers in view of the present orders on restrictions on data? The concerned authorities especially the Department of Defence and Department of Science and Technology should look into this aspect immediately. Maps on WGS 84 Vs Maps on Indian Datum We can say that WGS 84 represents a geocentric datum and very close to the assumption that center of WGS 84 ellipsoid coincides with C. G. of the Earth. It's center is estimated to be only + or - 2 metres away only. The assumption in case of Indian Geodetic System (Everest Spheroid) is that its center is nearly 1 km away from the C.G. of the earth. This ellipsoid is therefore not geocentric. Coordinates and maps on WGS 84 are therefore more important and vital. If we want to launch a missile across the continents, then if the launching station and target coordinates are in WGS 84, the result will be precise and accurate whereas if we have Indian system coordinates the missile is not likely to hit the target. This is because coordinates in different systems may vary by a few hundred metres to kilometres. It is therefore advisable that the coordinates in accurate system i.e. Everest Spheroid may be suitably derestricted immediately. In the meantime a new Indian Geodetic Datum may be defined. The project on " Redefinition of Indian Geodetic Datum " which was taken up around 1990 appears to have been shelved. It should be revived and completed within a specified period. Conclusion and Recommendations It is obvious that our infrastructure policy in surveying and mapping, security considerations and restriction policy should be thoroughly looked into and changed to suit the security as well as development of the country. The following recommendations are made: -
| ||
| © CSDMS. All rights reserved. |