Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 1997


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Advanced Technical Topics

Building & Supporting Applications

Business Evolution & Platform Migration

Expanding the User Base -- Non-Traditional Applications

From the office to the Field

Fundamental & Economic Issues of AM/FM/GIS

Lessons Learned

Major Technology Trends and their Impacts

Project Planning, Implementation and Management

Re-Engineering and Integration Issues

Scada and Real-Time Systems

User Project Presentations

Best of the Rest

Invited Presentation


GITA 1997


Business Evolution & Platform Migration


Integrating GIS with utility Information management Systems


Geographic Information System Implementation

GIS Project Goals
During the Master Plan scope preparation, OES staff realized that important data, a pipe’s diameter for instance, was being stored and maintained in three separate locations including paper maps, hydraulic models, and the OES infrastructure inventory database, CASS WORKS (RJN Group, Inc., Wheaton, IL). Staff also realized that there was no formal system in place to assure the same value for a data item in each of the three locations. The hydraulic modeling and GIS development portions of the Master Plan project will link two of the three data sources. OES strongly felt that there should be a “master” source of data that “feeds” all OES operations and computer applications. With this in mind, OES set the following goals for its GIS and integrated database system:
  • Mapping, hydraulic modeling, and the CASS WORKS infrastructure inventory database will be maintained in an integrated manner;
  • CASS WORKS will be the “master” storage location for all data it is configured to store;
  • Additional information required to support hydraulic modeling and other applications will be stored in supplemental (to CASS WORKS) database tables in various locations throughout the OES LAN and computer system;
  • Applications will be developed to automate data exchange between CASS WORKS and the mapping and modeling operations. Maps and hydraulic models will be updatable from the master database with the least amount of manual intervention;
  • GIS-generated maps will fully replace and automate the OES paper system maps;
  • GIS technology will allow for easy creation of CADD drawings to support engineering efforts; and
  • Many OES functions that currently require paper maps will be converted to direct data access using GIS software, therefore the GIS “viewing” software must be easy to use and customize.
GIS implementation will be accomplished using County standard software products including ESRI GM software; Oracle relational database management software and dBASE for database maintenance; Hydroworks for wastewater collection system modeling, and H20NET for water system modeling.

GIS Database Desian
The GIS database design evolved over the course of several months from an initial design as specified in the Master Plan project scope to a more detailed, and revised, final database design. OES and its consultant, Montgomery Watson, conducted numerous meetings and workshops to identifi the best approach to meet the identified GIS goals. Emphasis was placed on the need to cartographically reproduce OES paper maps, store map data in the master CASS WORKS database, and to organize data in such a manner to efficiently prepare hydraulic model input files. One major constraint was that no modification was to be made to the existing CASS WORKS inventory database structure during the GIS database design phase. This decision was made not because of limitations of the infrastructure inventory database and related software application (both of which can be customized), but rather as a preference of OES management.

The result of several months effort, a database dictionary document defining all GIS layers, valid database attribute values and codes, and cartographic standards was developed. This document will guide the GIS conversion and all custom application development efforts. The GIS database dictionary acts as a living document which must be updated as new facilities are represented in or changes made to the current GIS structure.

Each of the three OES retail service districts are stored separately on the GIS file server and include the three major utility layers (potable water, raw water, and the wastewater collection system), each including system facility location, cartographic symbology, and map annotation (text). Map features are not broken at map sheet borders, allowing the “seamless” GIS database to be easily downloaded to the hydraulic models with no artificial model nodes at map sheet boundaries.

As an illustration, the potable water distribution system is represented as follows:


Figure 1. GIS Representation of Broward County OES Potable Water Distribution System.

The map conversion effort, now underway, was designed in such a way to preserve existing data in the CASS WORKS database. GIS features are being linked to existing infrastructure inventory database records when available, with several database fields updated in the process, and new records are being added to the infrastructure inventory database when no record existed at the time of GIS database conversion. Extensive quality control programs were developed by the consultant and OES using Oracle SQL, C++, Arcview Avenue, and Arc/Info AML to ensure that existing information in CASS WORKS is not compromised, and that new information conforms to the rules defined in the GIS database dictionary.

Information Flow
Once in place, the integrated system allows sharing of data between the master infrastructure inventory database, the hydraulic models, and the GIS and mapping environment. OES is developing procedures to control how and when data will be transferred between the information systems. In general, data are moved from the master infrastructure inventory database to the modeling and GIS applications, but not from the GIS and models back to the master infrastructure inventory database. Figure 2 on the next page illustrates the movement of data between the major information systems within OES.

Page 2 of 4
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book