Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 1997


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Advanced Technical Topics

Building & Supporting Applications

Business Evolution & Platform Migration

Expanding the User Base -- Non-Traditional Applications

From the office to the Field

Fundamental & Economic Issues of AM/FM/GIS

Lessons Learned

Major Technology Trends and their Impacts

Project Planning, Implementation and Management

Re-Engineering and Integration Issues

Scada and Real-Time Systems

User Project Presentations

Best of the Rest

Invited Presentation


GITA 1997


Business Evolution & Platform Migration


Building AM/FM/GIS User Acceptance Through Communications


Setting up the face-to-face component of the communications program is a matter of getting “plugged into” meetings that are held within the affected areas. Using the list of target audiences identified in the communications program, the project spokesperson should prioritize the list of audiences and begin to schedule meetings or ask to be included on an existing meeting’s agenda. In today’s organization, time is a precious commodity. Therefore, a project spokesperson should never go to a meeting unprepared, and should always deliver substance.

There are also unique venues and opportunities to capitalize on the effectiveness of face-to- face communications. These may include additional meetings that are generated by the project or strategic corporate information sessions such as a “lunch and learn” program. Lunch-and-learn programs can be highly effective in communicating information about the technology to users as well as to non-users. During these sessions, employees can learn about the technology’s benefits while viewing a demonstration. Lunch-and-learn sessions tend to build excitement towards the technology on a corporate level. Using every opportunity to make the technology and the project visible greatly reduces employees’ fears and enhances the chances for success of the project.

The downside to face-to-face communication is that it is extremely demanding in terms of time and emotions. The demand on time is self evident and can be easily measured in dollars and cents. The drain on emotions is more subtle. Change and the fear of change will bring out the best in some and the worst in others. Dealing with volatile human emotions on a daily basis can be extremely difficult.

The second component of a balanced communications program is using printed materials. Their value lies in allowing the project to leverage its presence throughout the company. Where face-to-face communication is limited in the number of people reached at any given moment, printed material enables the project to be in many places at the same time. During times of change employees may feel a sense of security in information they can “touch and hold.” Printed material gives the employee an opportunity to review and absorb the information within their own time frame. It also can be referenced at a later date to clarify questions that arise as the AM/FM/GIS project progresses.

Another effective approach to using printed material is “project fact cards.” These laminated cards contain basic facts about the project and the technology, such as the history of the project, benefits of the technology to the individual and the organization, logistics on the roll-out of application and background information on technology service providers. These cards typically are handed out to front-line supervisors to help them communicate facts about the project and selected applications. Using these cards eliminates subjectivity and builds consistency in the information that is distributed to those not close to the project’s day-to-day operations.

The risk of using printed material is that during the course of the project information is constantly changing and employees may reference material that is no longer valid. It is important to negate this risk by keeping employees abreast of the changes with the latest information.

The third component of a balanced communications program is to use technical tools. Examples of such tools include e-mail, voice mail, or a “hot line” for employees to call and leave questions or concerns. These tools are highly effective in quickly distributing information to many people. This is especially true for major changes in the project or news “flashes” which need immediate distribution.

As with the other components of the communications program, it is necessary to identifi and evaluate the different technological communications tools available in the organization. The variety and sophistication of the tools will vary from organization to organization and industry to industry. Once the tools have been identified and evaluated, help from other areas of the company maybe required to establish their use. For instance, the company’s Communications department may be called upon to set up a “hot line” account.

A few of the tools may also require the project team or the spokesperson to enlist special training to become proficient in the tools being used. If this is the case, then it may indicate that the rest of the organization is unfamiliar with the tool, or lacks access to the technology. For instance, remote sites may not have access to certain technologies such as electronic mail.

Different phases of the AM./FM/GIS project will place different demands on each component of the communications program. At times during the project, face-to-face communication will be the predominant method of distributing information. At other times some other component will be the preferred vehicle. Without a balanced communications program, the project may suffer considerably if information is not distributed using the most effective vehicles. With a balanced communications program, valuable information can be distributed in a variety of ways as the demands and status of the project dictate.

Challenges
One key challenge for any AM/FM/GIS project is that it may not be the “only game in town,” and therefore may be competing for precious time with other projects. Since time is a commodity that cannot be replaced, the chosen information media of the GIS project should never waste an employee’s time. After all, when users perceive that information coming from the project is less than substantial, the project and the project team lose valuable credibility. The price tag for this error ultimately could be the loss of acceptance of the technology by the users.

Another key challenge is the fact that most utilities have limited facilities for conducting meetings, demonstrations, and workshops. Again, the GIS project will be competing with other projects and existing meetings. Unfortunately, because the project plan is the driver for when project information is distributed, the flexibility to schedule around the limited facilities becomes a real challenge. Some tactful negotiating or alternative methods may be necessary.

It is also challenging to differentiate between the target audiences’ “social” and “technical” emotions. Social emotions are characterized by hurt feelings and, in some instances, outright hostility. Technical emotions are more aligned with feelings of inadequacy in relation to the new business environment. For example, a typical employee has worked in the utility for many years and probably has experienced little or no change during his or her career. Today, such employees are increasingly expected to accept and adopt dramatic change at break-neck speed. They often feel as though they are literally riding an emotional roller coaster. The objective of effective communications within the project is to distinguish between types of emotions, be genuinely empathetic to employees’ feelings, and avoid taking any attacks on the project personally.

Summary
Today as utilities become more adept in project organization, effective communications is no longer an afterthought. Projects are resource intensive; no utility can afford to risk a project with ineffective communications. After all, projects don’t fail because of the technology, they fail because of the people issues. In the future, with GIS projects implementing effective communications programs, fewer project managers will be overheard saying, “it wasn’t a technology problem, it was a ‘people’ problem.”

Page 3 of 3
| Previous |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book