Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 1997


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Advanced Technical Topics

Building & Supporting Applications

Business Evolution & Platform Migration

Expanding the User Base -- Non-Traditional Applications

From the office to the Field

Fundamental & Economic Issues of AM/FM/GIS

Lessons Learned

Major Technology Trends and their Impacts

Project Planning, Implementation and Management

Re-Engineering and Integration Issues

Scada and Real-Time Systems

User Project Presentations

Best of the Rest

Invited Presentation


GITA 1997


Best of the Rest
Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 2
| Next |


Schematics, as Output

David Fensterheim
Formula Software Services, Ltd., 35 Reiness Street, Israel 43374


Abstract
Public utilities such as telephone, electric, gas and water companies are using AM/FM (Automated Mapping / Facility Management) systems to manage their networks. AM/FM technology combines a graphic/ geographic interface with a relational database to manage a companies facilities and to track how cables and other facilities are connected. These systems shorten the time required to design new network and generate engineering work orders.

Traditionally an operator used an AM/FM system to produces maps and reports. In addition to maps, however, it is often necessary to produce details of how a network is connected. Schematic diagrams legibly display details of how items of plant are connected. In order to present these details clearly, the graphics is oriented logically rather than geographically. The schematic linework is typically drawn manually and connectivity information is entered during this process.

This paper presents an automatic schematic generator. A schematic generator not only saves the time required to draw the schematics but makes operations, such as connecting cables and inspecting connectivity, more efficient. Complex connection scenarios may be automated since all data entry is alphanumeric.

Traditional Schematics in Telecommunications (Outside Plant) Connectivity diagrams are particularly important in the design and management of communications networks. A telephone cable may contain any number of wires or fibers. Each wire pair or range of pairs/fibers maybe connected to a range in a connecting cable.

Imbedded Details
Various attempts are made to display the connectivity of a telephone network on a geographic network map. Details displaying the connectivity (pair counts, joints, etc.) of a specific location (e.g. hole, pole) are drawn on the map on or near the junction location. All connections occurring at the location are drawn on the detail.

In order to avoid considerable clutter, the details are drawn at a scale only legible when viewing the detail only. When displayed on a computer screen, the viewer must zoom in so that the diagram fills the screen. When plotting a map at a typical scale (1:500 or 1:1250) the details become illegible.

Off Map Details
To solve the clutter problem, these diagrams are often drawn off the map as separate details. In some systems, a continuous joint diagram of an entire phone network is drawn.

Tables
Where each cable is uniquely identified, a table maybe created which lists the wire/fiber assigmnents. At Bezeq’s northern district in Israel, a table for each joint is produced resembling the following chart. The number of columns correspond to the number of feed and fed cables. Tables for a number of joints maybe horizontally chained showing the continuity of a main cable or trunk.


This format was adopted into Bezeq’s AM/FM system as both a report form as well as a data entry form for defining connectivity. This method however does not provide a clear graphic diagram which would convey the information in a more legible format.

Problems

Manual Detail Entry
Whether a detail is drawn on the geographic map or off the map, they are usually entered into the AMIFM database by manually drawing graphics. The detail graphics may be linked to the geographic graphics thereby allowing the application to display the detail of a geographic object or visa versa.

In a typical placement scenario:
  • Strand data and cables are placed on the map
  • On a separate area of the graphics space, a detail is drawn of a manhole or pole and the associated joints.
  • Lines representing the cables (previously placed geographically) are drawn to the detail.
  • Lines are drawn connecting the cables during which time the user specifies the specifics of the connection (pair count etc.).
This process is both time consuming and restricting. It is time consuming since what would normally be simple data entry becomes a matter of drafting. It is restricting since connectivity must always be defined the same way.

Page 1 of 2
| Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book