GISdevelopment.net ---> GITA 1997 ---> Lessons Learned

System Success Factors and the top ten reasons AM/FM/GIS projects falter

Nancy B. Lamer,David P. DiSera
EMA Services, Inc. 4319 Medical Drive, Suite 131-343, San Antonio, Texas 78229 Phone: (210) 697-3535 Fax: (210) 697-3570


Abstract
AM/FM/GIS implementation involves scores of people, hundreds of tasks, years of work, and millions of dollars. Project success depends on strong executive commitment, rigorous project management, technical expertise, programmed communications, and other important factors. This paper examines the keys to success by presenting the top ten reasons that past projects have fallen short of expectations. It then explores ways to overcome common barriers to successful AM/FM/GIS implementation.

AM/FM/GIS Implementation Obstacles
The best way to identify critical success factors for AM/FM/GIS implementation is to analyze the reasons behind projects that stumbled along the way. Following are ten of the most common implementation obstacles and suggestions for overcoming them.

Loss of Momentum
GIS planning and implementation is a time-consuming process. Although most organizations experience a wave of enthusiasm at the outset of a GIS development project, it is natural for this enthusiasm to wane over time. Without constant attention to ensure that implementation tasks are completed successfully and on schedule, the waning enthusiasm can lead to a dangerous loss of momentum. Loss of momentum is a common problem when key GIS staff leave the organization or are assigned different duties.
  • A large county appraisal district, intent on building a precise cadastral instrument, spent ten years COGO-ing and aligning its parcels. During this time, no information was released to the county because the organization wanted to complete its efforts before making them public. Although the organization worked diligently over the course of the ten year development period, other county agencies perceived that the project was “dead in the water” because they did not feel any progress.
The best way to combat this problem is to plan for a steady stream of new end user applications throughout the long implementation process. Even in the earliest phases of implementation, it is possible to develop simple data access screens that take advantage of existing maps and databases (or even pilot data). By introducing a new application every month or two, the organization can preserve a sense of progress and momentum.

Another tool to battle loss of momentum is a regular newsletter highlighting project activities and progress. Communication with end users is very important, and a newsletter is an effective, economical way to ensure that everyone in the organization is kept up to date.

Unrealistic Expectations
GIS technology is rapidly improving, but it is not a magic bullet. For many local government decision makers, the first and only exposure to GIS has been a magazine article or a brief session at a conference. They hear about the very best that a mature system has to offer without learning about the long struggle that went into development of that system. This results in unrealistic expectations about what the technology can actually do or about how quickly a system can be fully implemented.
  • A medium-sized utility on the West Coast purchased some GIS software, scanned and rubber-sheeted its old, paper schematics, and roughly vectorized its infrastructure. The organization expected this low cost system to meet all utility needs and was very disheartened to learn that a significant additional investment would be needed before the system would be broadly useful.
  • A smaller utility purchased a GIS in the expectation that the technology would “fix” the inaccuracies and gaps in existing maps and as-builts. Decision makers felt deceived when they learned that the computers could not magically “fix” the data and that they would have to spend time and money on extensive field surveys.
The best way to combat this problem is to educate all key decision makers at the outset of the GIS planning effort and to reinforce proper expectations throughout the implementation of the system. A regular newsletter can be an effective means of reinforcing realistic expectations.

Implementation Paralysis
GIS implementation, like any other major information systems implementation project, involves hundreds of individual, interdependent tasks that can be difficult to manage. Organizations face a risk of becoming overwhelmed by the magnitude and complexity of the effort, and this can lead to virtual paralysis of implementation.
  • A county-wide GIS project in the Mid-West struggled for over five years after acquiring its aerial photography because the cooperating organizations could not get a handle on who should be doing what to implement the system. No single organization had the resources to do it all, nobody knew whereto begin, and by the time the county’s GIS staff were ready to develop some applications, the original aerial photography was completely outdated.
The best ways to mitigate this risk are to utilize an automated project management tool and to hire or designate a full-time GIS Coordinator whose only responsibility is GIS implementation management. In the case of a cooperative regional effort, it is essential for the all the organizations to recognize a single regional coordinator. Inter-local agreements or memoranda of understanding are usually necessary to formalize this recognition.

Some cities have addressed the risk of implementation paralysis by outsourcing GIS implementation management. The drawback of this approach is that the cities miss the opportunity to build in-house expertise that will be invaluable for day-to-day system operations once implementation is complete.

Scope Creep
Since GIS can benefit so many departments and divisions in a local government or utility, and since an organization can literally identify hundreds of potential GIS applications, there is a tendency for the scope of GIS projects to creep outward until people are attempting to do too many things at once.
  • A major municipal utility district on the East Coast spent more than six years in the pilot phase of its GIS project as it added more and more features to its maps and databases. All the while, end users continued to do things the “old way” while wondering if they would ever see a working GIS.

  • While in the early stages of its AM/FM data conversion effort, a water wholesaler in the United States became distracted by the possibility of selling its data to other utilities and local governments. The organization started devoting resources to the capture of data that it did not need but that it thought would be marketable, and staff that were originally designated to work on internal AM/FM project were re-assigned to work on the marketing effort. Five years later, the data conversion project was not yet complete, no applications had been developed, no data maintenance procedures had been implemented, and nobody had purchased the as yet unfinished database.
The best way to control scope creep is to clearly define project scope and then maintain a detailed work plan that ties back to this scope definition. Project management software can be helpful here.

Sticker Shock
GIS implementation can be very expensive, particularly if an organization has to develop its own base map and facility maps. Many local governments have discovered that their officials are unwilling to fund the effort once they see the price tag.
  • A regional GIS consortium in the Southwest began making plans for base map development. Mid-level management understood that this effort would cost over a million dollars and recognized that this was a reasonable budget for a major GIS data development effort. However, when city and county officials learned that they were building a “million dollar map,” they quickly shut down the project.
The best way to avoid this problem is to educate policy makers about potential costs before the planning project begins and then to involve the policy makers in the development of the implementation budget and schedule.

Benign Neglect
The implementation of a GIS requires a multi-year commitment of funds. Some cities have run into trouble when policy makers lose interest in the project and begin shifting funds. l Enthusiastic about its new GIS project, a county in the Deep South invested half a million dollars in base map development, hired GIS staff, and purchased hardware and software. However, other issues took precedence in future years. The county continued to fund the staff positions, but when it came time to update the base map and re-fly rapidly growing areas, officials never committed sufficient funds. As a result, the high quality base map they initially developed became less and less valuable over time. County officials were still in 405?favor of a strong GIS program; they simply did not give it the necessary attention and resources.

To combat this tendency toward benign neglect, an organization should have a policy maker or senior executive that serves as the GIS Project Champion. This individual is an official “cheerleader” for the project, keeps it at the forefront of policy makers’ attention, and maintains regular communications with GIS staff. The GIS Champion must have the ear of governing officials and must have a genuine interest in the GIS project. Mid-level managers and technical staff interested in building any major information system such as AM/FM/GIS should seek a Project Champion at the outset.

Misuse of Data
Spatial data have properties that many users do not understand. Without a basic understanding of the fundamentals of topology, cartography, data resolution, and surveying, staff may unintentionally misuse GIS data. This problem is especially critical in the early phases of implementation when an organization has not yet institutionalized procedures for using the GIS data.
  • License approval staff in an urban county used to take field measurements to ensure that each new business license application was in compliance with regulations regarding the proximity of other establishments. When the county implemented its GIS with a schematic-quality base map, the licensing staff quit doing the field measurements and began scaling the distances off the schematic. They did not realize that the data were unsuitable for this task, and this compromised their ability to fairly administer licensing regulations.
Members of the general public are at an even greater risk than internal staff for unintentionally misusing or misinterpreting spatial data. For example, many citizens will improperly compare accurate parcel maps with schematic flood zones from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and will draw erroneous conclusions about whether particular properties fall in particular flood zones Two ways to mitigate the risk of internal misuse are to educate end users and to maintain metadata that explain how specific data sets should be used. User education should include the fundamentals of mapping and map interpretation as well as the basics of database management. Metadata should be maintained as rigorously as the data it documents, and users should have automatic access to metadata any time they query the GIS. In order to combat data misuse by the general public, an organization can utilize standard disclaimers on all spatial data products it distributes. Public education may also be an option for local governments.

Turfism
Who manages the GIS? In a multi-departmental or regional project, people may perceive that one agency or department will end up controlling the system and the data. Some departments will be delighted that somebody else will have the all headaches, but others may be concerned that they will lose influence or that the GIS will not meet all their needs. This can lead to battles over who “owns” the system, who administers the hardware and software, and who maintains the “real” data.

When turfkm surfaces and is not adequately addressed, it is a safe bet that some departments or agencies are going to be dissatisfied with the cooperative effort. These dissatisfied groups may 406?become impatient with the speed of implementation, or they may decide that they cannot work with the data sets or applications built and maintained by other departments. In either case, the detractors often decide to embark on their own projects. This can lead to incompatible data and systems as well as redundant development costs.

One way to prevent turfism from becoming an issue is to involve all agencies and departments in the GIS planning process. In extreme situations, a new and separate agency or department may have to be created for the GIS. There is know way to order people not to feel threatened by turf issues, but the top official(s) in the organization or region can issue a directive prohibiting all agencies and departments from pursuing GIS outside the scope of the cooperative project. Then, if a particular group becomes impatient with the process and wants to expedite development of particular data sets and applications, its only alternative is to work with the recognized GIS manager to fund or assign additional resources for those tasks.

GIS in a Vacuum
GIS benefits depend to a large extent on the existence of an integrated information environment, including an enterprise database. Organizations will struggle to gain value from their GIS investments if they do not have clear information systems goals and standards or if they allow staff to develop standalone databases.
  • An electric utility decided to build an AM/FM system and to integrate it with their existing maintenance and customer information systems. However, the existing systems were home-grown products on an outdated mainframe computer with an obsolete architecture. There were no AM/FM software products on the market that could interact directly with the legacy system. Staff knew that the utility would eventually have to move to a more modem architecture for its corporate system, but there were no formal plans, goals, or standards. As a result, they spent several years designing an AMEM that could link to a system that they knew they would eventually abandon.
In order to mitigate this type of risk, an organization should complete a strategic plan for general information systems before planning specifically for a GIS.

The New Homeowner’s Disillusionment {Maintenance Woes\ Anyone who has ever purchased a home will remember that sinking feeling common to all first time home buyers as they realize that their evenings, weekends, and paychecks are about to be consumed by home maintenance. Just like houses, GIS databases must be carefully maintained to retain their value. And procrastination just makes the maintenance harder and more expensive !

The biggest risk of any data development project is that people will refuse to use the data because the content is inadequate or, more frequently, because the records are too far out of date. GIS data conversion can take many months, and sometimes the source data itself is months or years old.
  • A medium-sized southern city hired a conversion firm to create digital infrastructure maps. At the time the files were delivered, the city had not yet purchased software, written applications, or designated personnel to maintain the data. Five years later, when the people, software, and policies were in place, the data was so old that the city had to discard it and start from scratch.

  • A utility near the West Coast spent seven years converting its facility maps. The utility decided to wait until everything was converted before releasing the data, so the Engineering Department continued using its paper map books. During this time, the utility’s service area underwent rapid growth. As a result, they had a huge, seven-year backlog of updates that had to be posted before the conversion project was completed.
The first step in combating data conversion risks is to thoroughly specify all data conversion projects and to scrub all source data to ensure it is as up-to-date as possible. Another important step is to define interim source data maintenance procedures so that changes that occur during the conversion process can be added to the new files as quickly and efficiently as possible. Once a geographic area has been converted, the old data should be replaced by the digital data as quickly as possible in order to minimize update backlogs. For some organizations this will result in hybrid map set during the conversion process, but this temporary inconvenience is usually less burdensome than the update backlog that would otherwise result. Finally, in order to ensure that its data sets retain their value over time, it is absolutely critical for an organization to define data maintenance procedures and responsibilities for each new data set. These procedures and assignments should be documented well before the new data comes on line.

Summary of critical success factors
Successful AMIFM/GIS projects prevent or overcome the implementation obstacles described above. Such projects share many of the following critical success factors:

  • A full-time GIS Coordinator whose only responsibility is AM/FM/GIS implementation management
  • A highly placed GIS Project Champion
  • An automated project management tool that reflects a thorough implementation plan with a clearly defined project scope
  • Rapid development of simple end user applications
  • Programmed, formal communications with end users, which may include a regular newsletter Officials who have been educated about the realistic potential and the costs of AM/FM/GIS
  • A participative planning effort that includes all agencies, departments, and officials
  • Metadata
  • A strategic information systems plan that identifies general IS goals and standards
  • A GIS education program for end users
  • Clear data maintenance assignments and documented data maintenance procedures
© GISdevelopment.net. All rights reserved.