Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 1997


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Advanced Technical Topics

Building & Supporting Applications

Business Evolution & Platform Migration

Expanding the User Base -- Non-Traditional Applications

From the office to the Field

Fundamental & Economic Issues of AM/FM/GIS

Lessons Learned

Major Technology Trends and their Impacts

Project Planning, Implementation and Management

Re-Engineering and Integration Issues

Scada and Real-Time Systems

User Project Presentations

Best of the Rest

Invited Presentation


GITA 1997


Project planning, implementation and management
Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 3
| Next |


Tips for managing your conversion schedule

David R. Coates
Intelligraphics International
741 N. Grand Avenue
Waukesha. Wisconsin 53186


Introduction
Data conversion is one of the most demanding, costly and time consuming aspects of AM/FM/GIS project implementation. This paper explores the impact of the conversion schedule on expectations within the utility organization as well as the performance of the conversion services provider. While the lines between the economic, logistical and political reasons for a realistic schedule sometimes get blurred, their impact on the success of the project is clear. Based on experience in more than 60 conversion projects, a proactive approach to schedule creation and maintenance is described. Finally, some tips on what to do if the schedule gets off track are offered.

Economic reasons
As anyone who has been involved in an AM/FM/GIS system implementation will tell you, conversion is the single most expensive component of the project cost. For this reason and because the decisions made during the conversion phase will have long lasting implications for the system, the sequence and impact of events must be well orchestrated. The business case developed to justify conversion and other project costs depends upon benefits achieved within a given time frame. A conversion schedule which is not met due to unrealistic goals or mismanagement will undoubtedly result in unrealized benefits and added cost to the organization. This ofien leads to a very uncomfortable position for the Implementation Manager as the pressure horn executive management and other affected departments are brought to bear.

Logistical reasons
Over the course of the planning and approval process, many areas of the organization are involved in the AM/FM/GIS project and become stockholders in the outcome of the project implementation. Key information management initiatives which impact your internal suppliers and/or internal customers may require coordination with the AM/FM/GIS system schedule. Any delays will inevitably affect their workflow and productivity. Training of personnel on the new system must be timed properly so that the availability of tools and data corresponds to instruction and support services. Frustration with the “new” system at the outset can have a devastating impact on morale and user acceptance.

In order to control the flow of data during the conversion phase, records are usually “frozen” for a period of time. This means that current record data will not be available to the organization for a period of time. This can significantly impact the efficiency of certain areas within the organization. If the freeze period extends beyond what was originally scheduled, the organizational impacts become even greater.

Political reasons
AM/FM projects are typically broad-based initiatives which require substantial time and commitment to bring to the approval stage. For this reason, they are also frequently high profile projects. Published schedules understandably set expectations. Unmet schedules are often construed to be the result of poor project management. If key milestones are not met, the entire project may get bad press within the organization and lose credibility. Because these projects typically last for a period of months and even years, this damage can seriously impact the prospect of future funding, management support and user acceptability.

Page 1 of 3
| Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book