Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 1997


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Advanced Technical Topics

Building & Supporting Applications

Business Evolution & Platform Migration

Expanding the User Base -- Non-Traditional Applications

From the office to the Field

Fundamental & Economic Issues of AM/FM/GIS

Lessons Learned

Major Technology Trends and their Impacts

Project Planning, Implementation and Management

Re-Engineering and Integration Issues

Scada and Real-Time Systems

User Project Presentations

Best of the Rest

Invited Presentation


GITA 1997


Project planning, implementation and management


Cost effective AM/FM/GIS CAD conversions,on time


Technology considerations
There are many technology considerations to be considered when contemplating CAD conversion. These include all aspects of several main areas of focus. These can include:
  1. Data Base Considerationsfor any integration.
  2. NetworkingIssues.
  3. The CADsysteminto which the data is to be converted.
  4. Conversiontechnologiesand methodologiesavailable.
All of these must be consideredas business and technical goals are established to guide the overall process, This is a critical part of the structured approach to developing an overall plan for conversion.

  1. Data Base considerations
    When developing an AM/FM/GIS land base tied to the business and engineering functions of any firrm the database considerations take on tremendous importance. Should there be a central data base, should the data base be distributed or networked should duplicate records be maintained, how are duplicate systems reconciled and at what COst how large can a central or distributeddatabase become,howare the databases segment@ what accessprivilegesare requiredfor difTerentgroups,what type of networkis requiredfor the users, etc.. All of these questions,and more, are extremelycritical. Current technologies,either alreadyin place at the firm, or to be acquiredas a result of the project must be analyzedand their capabilitiesmeasuredagainst the answersto these questionsand the goals for the project. Generally,the less duplicationand needfor reconciliationbetweendata bases, the better. Resultinganswersand plans must be consideredin light of their impact on cmmmmicationchannelsand interfacesbetweengroupshiisciplines.


  2. The target CAD System
    CADsystemshavebeen evolvingsincethe late 1970’s.Selectinga CADsystemhas been a task which many companieshavegone through severaltimes. Generally,everythingthat is being stated here about a stnwtmd analysisapproachto conversio%can be applied to the selectionof a CADsystemas well. In the case of conversion projectsseekingto take full advantageof any AIWFIWGISmnversiou existing CADsoftwaremust be analyzed against the business and technical goalsbeing establishedfor the conversion. If the goals establishedfor the project cannotbe achievedwith existing software,then the cost of new softwarethat accommodatesthe goals needsto be measuredagainst the levelof attainment possiblewith the existing software. If new sofhvareis required,then it shouldbe purchasedthrough a structuredanalysismethodthat uses the goals established for the conversion project and the general requirements for design and drafting, to developa specification. From there, a pilot, or benchmark, should be establishedto evaluate vendors. Do not rely on goodmarketingpresentations,or “wow”demos.


  3. Conversion Technologies/Methodologies available
    There are severalmethodologieswhich havebeen developedand are employedto convertmanual drawingsand data to digital format. It is critical to selecta method after careiidlymeasuringthe various options against the goalswhich havebeen establishedfor the conversionproject. In additioma numberof basic questionsneedto be considered beforeselectinga method. Suchquestionsas: Are the resulting files mainlyfor archivalpurposes,or will they be activein the desigrdengineeringprocess? Is there associateddatabase informationattachedto the graphicsfrom whichtechnical or businessfunctionskeyoff of? What degreeof accuracyand tolerancingis required? Howmany layersor levelsare required?What standardsand conventionsare employed?Howlarge are the drawings?Howdense are the graphics?What is the state of the existing media (copies,blue line, micro-film etc.)?Thesetypes of questions, and issues regarding relativecosts of the various options, will have an impacton the type of methodologyemployedto convertthe drawings. Table 1 showsvarious conversionoptions availableand their pro’s and con’s.

    Table 1- Basic Conversion Methodology Comparison


    The above table is meant to be a basic comparison of methods. Depending on the goals established,any of the methodscan be applied successfully,if the goals and the inherent strengths and weaknesses are fully considered. Many times a combination of methods may be required. In any case, it is critical to develop a thorough specification based on the business and technical goals, the technical requirements(standards,conventions,D/B design, etc.), and the budgetary and scheduling issues. Such a document will serve as a guide through the entire process.
Page 2 of 5
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book