Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 1997


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Advanced Technical Topics

Building & Supporting Applications

Business Evolution & Platform Migration

Expanding the User Base -- Non-Traditional Applications

From the office to the Field

Fundamental & Economic Issues of AM/FM/GIS

Lessons Learned

Major Technology Trends and their Impacts

Project Planning, Implementation and Management

Re-Engineering and Integration Issues

Scada and Real-Time Systems

User Project Presentations

Best of the Rest

Invited Presentation


GITA 1997


User Project Presentations
Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 2
| Next |


El Paso Energy's - Field force automation project

J. Stephen Ellis
El Paso Energy, P.O. BOX 2511
HoustoL Texas 77252-2511


Abstract
This paper will review the former Tenneco Energy’s (now a susidiary of El Paso Energy) mobile computing and field force automation initiative which is essential to distributing its innovative World Class Operations technologies for in-field use along a 12,000 mile corridor stretching fi-om the Gulf Of Mexico to New England. This initiative covers Tennessee Gas Pipeline, East Tennessee Natural Gas, and Midwestern Natural Gas, collectively known as Tennessee. Tennessee is in the deployment phase of a three year World Class Operations (WCO) effort aimed at re-engineering its core engineering, constructio~ operations and maintenance processes with an emphasis on maintaining operating cost leadership and sustaining high system reliability. The redesigned, end-to-end business processes associated with the WCO Project require the implementation of new technology and the integration of multiple applications spanning the Tennessee enterprise. WCO initiatives include AM/FM/GIS, Document Management, Work Management and Project Planning and Control. Key points of discussion will include Tenneco Energy’s connected and disconnected mobile computing applicatio~ its supporting architecture and “in-field laptop and penbased hardware, application middleware requirements, communications support and the integration of GPS technology with specialty pipeline data recording applications.

Project History
Whh the advent of Order 636, Tennessee was faced with the biggest challenge in its fifty year history - transforming a traditional, regulated company with a fixed-rate-of-return mentalhy into a world class service provider in a highly competitive, deregulated, global marketplace. The company had already been confronted with the hard reality of the economic scissors curve: rising operations costs on its fifty year old pipeline system and lower revenues fi-om the sale of gas transportation services. Steps had been taken to control costs and improve customer service, but by early 1994 it was clear that ii.uther measures would be necessruy. A three-year re-engineering project, which we call World Class Operations (WCO), was initiated shortly thereafter to firther streamline our operations and maintenance processes. In the late fall of 1996, Tenneco Energy was merged with El Paso Energy Company. The merger did not significantly impact the project in that the project was completed as designed, however, the actual implementation was transfemed to the line organization to ensure alignment with the new company strategies.

The WCO vision is to provide real-time operating data throughout the company to ensure higher quality, lower cost, and more timely product and semice delivery. We are moving away flom disconnected databases that can’t share information across the company towards a technology solution that will enable employees to enter data at the source where the work is taking place and distribute that data seamlessly across the organization. Previous technical solutions had been more departmentally focused and created small islands of information within the company. This in turn placed additional administrative burdens on the field worldorce to supply duplicate data to the 728?difkmt departments via the fragmented systems. The result was higher operating costs, less timely data availability and inefficient use o~ and access to, company resources. We expect the WCO project to correct these problems, and enhance Tennessee’s ability to make and meet customer commitments through improved management of our gas facilities, and the associated records, maps, scheduling and human resource activities. This will be accomplished through re-engineered work processes, automated where appropriate, and use of off-the-shelf technology enablers to modernize and standardize our operations business approaches. The project will implement SAROS Document Management (DM) solutio~ PSDI’SMaximo Work Management (WM) systeq Primavera’s Project Planning and Control @P&C) package, and Intergraph’s Automated Mapping/Facility Management/Geographic Information System (AIWFIWGIS). A key component of the AM/FM/GIS initiative was tooling the field operations personnel with a mobile computing solution to capture our facility data dkectly at the source.

Mobile Computing and the AM/FM. IGIS Solution
Our strategy in deploying the AM/FM/GIS technology within the WCO project included capitalizing on the knowledge of our field personnel and providing the tools they needed to accurately record itiormation about the location and composition of our facilities. This concept formed the foundation of the mobile computing, or worlciiorce automatio~ portion of AIVUHWGIS.The intent of workforce automation was to develop a field system that was easy to use and wouldn’t place additional work on operations personnel. We decided on a mobile computing solution combined with global positioning system (GPS) technology as a means to correct our alignment sheets and maps. This process was also utilized to capture critical facility data.

Members of our pipeline crew were included as part of the team developing the system and defining the look and feel of the mobile AMiFM/GIS field applications. In order to select a crew, we needed to narrow our choices to a location on the pipeline that would reasonably represent the Tennessee syste~ which includes over 17,000 miles of pipeline stretching from Texas to Canada. The location needed to have a good operating history and we had to have a group of people who believed in the project. We finally settled on a district location on our East Tennessee Natural Gas system located in Ooltewfi Tennessee.

During workshops conducted at the Ooltewah office, participants agreed on four major categories of work to be included as part of the project. These included Preliminary SurvV, As-Built Constructioxq Final Survey and Operations& Maintenance. After agreeing on these four categories, we put our software developers side by side with the pipeline crew to arrive at the best solution for capturing data associated with each work process and then verified the data for source locations. A review of all the currently used paper forms was also conducted to ensure that our design would provide the information required by all areas of the organization. Based on information gathered during the workshops and associated prototype sessions, we developed a detailed design document detlning each new process. Equipment options were matched to the work performed, and the crew members evaluated a variety of mobile computing units before selecting the unit they felt best matched their needs and environment. Applications were then developed for the selected hardware.

As might be expected, many technical challenges arose during development of the worl&orce automation solution. One of the largest issues related to moving large design data sets across the 729?company’s wide area network which eventually was resolved by cutting C D‘s of data sets from the main AM/FM/GIS system and shipping them to field locations. Smaller amounts of data could be passed through a message server which acts as a request manager between the mobile computing agent and the AM/FM/GIS server. This approach lessened the demand on the main system and the need to put high end software on each mobile unit. Additionally, to meet the challenge of managing a number of applications on the unit, we settled on a single viewing software package that allows the end user to view a variety of document formats. By limiting ourselves to this one viewing applicatio~ employees don’t have to become experts on the AMA?IWGIS,work management or document management systems and we reduce the transition period for end-users to adapt to the new system. Everything is delivered through the single viewing application that has been tailored to fit their work process. Information to be sent to a user is placed in an in-box on the message server. The next time the user connects to the system the data is automatically delivered. If they have information to send back to the main system it is removed from their out-box and delivered to the server and later passed into the main AM/FM/GIS server for processing.

In planning the way to capture information for the four work processes, we tried to mirror the current work flow processes as much as possible while eliminating non-value added activities. For example, in the current paradigm the crew members report to work in the morning to receive their assignments. They gather up the tools, materials and documentation needed for the work to be performed each day and then drive to the facility site, often quite a long distance from the office. In the evening, they drive back to the office and give any forms they completed that day to the administrative person for data entry. They also advise the superintendent or foreman of any conditions they noticed while they were out that need to be scheduled for follow-up, such as the right-of way requiring mowing or other minor repairs.

Using mobile computing, we will follow a similar work flow, but streamline the process. The employee logs into the system in the morning to get the latest information and assignment for the coming day, including necessary documentation and tools required for the job. During the day, the employee will update and record information related to their assignments on the laptop, eliminating the need to keep up with paper copies of forms, maps or procedures. The~ at the end of the day, the employee will log back into the system and upload the day’s information onto the network. During the night, the system processes the informatio~ dhibuting to various departments as needed, and places the next day’s work in the system mail box. Further efficiencies can be gained in the process by having the information available to the employee from the office, on the road, or at home. In this way the employee can head straight to the worksite in the morning.

Page 1 of 2
| Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book