Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 1997


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997
Sessions

Advanced Technical Topics

Building & Supporting Applications

Business Evolution & Platform Migration

Expanding the User Base -- Non-Traditional Applications

From the office to the Field

Fundamental & Economic Issues of AM/FM/GIS

Lessons Learned

Major Technology Trends and their Impacts

Project Planning, Implementation and Management

Re-Engineering and Integration Issues

Scada and Real-Time Systems

User Project Presentations

Best of the Rest

Invited Presentation


GITA 1997


User Project Presentations
Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 3
| Next |


Quality control for land base and facilities conversion

Mohammad Tariq
Program Manager (GIS), Boston Water and Sewer Commission
425 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210

David Koehler
Sr. Research Analyst,Pkmgraphics, Inc.
1300 Spring Street, Silver Spring, MD 20910


Abstract
One of the key factors in timely and successfi,d implementation of an AM/FM/GIS is the establishment of quality control procedures for reviewing and accepting products from conversion contractors. The Boston Water and Sewer Commission implemented uniform quality control (QC ) procedures for inspection of hard copy and digital products to ensure confidence in the accuracy of the land base and facilities GIS databases being developed. The hard copy and digital data are checked to confirm content and positional accuracy of graphic features, adherence to the database design, correctness of attribute data, annotation, topology and overall consistency and completeness of the databases.

Introduction
The Commission is responsible for providing water and sewer and storm drainage services in the City of Boston. The City encompasses approximately 45 square miles of area and according to the 1990 US census has a residential population of 574,283, plus an additional daytime population of 480,000. The Commission owns and maintains approximately 1,340 miles of sewers, including 535 miles of sanitary sewers, 490 miles of storm drains, and 315 miles of combined sewers, and a number of other facilities, including pumping stations, tidegates and regulators. All wastewater generated in the city is transported to the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA) treatment facilities located at Deer Island in Boston and Nut Island in Quincy. The Commission also owns and maintains approximately 1,182 miles of water mains. Water for the City of Boston is purchased from the MWRA at an average of about 90 million gallons per day. There are currently 85,500 customer accounts.

The majority of the Commission’s maps and data regarding water and sewer facilities are in paper format. Existing water and sewer-related information is maintained on 100’and 50’ scale maps. These maps, drawings and related data are updated and revised manually.

The Commission’s major objectives in establishing an AM/FM/GIS are to:
  • Develop an efficient means of maintaining up-to-date water and sewer system maps and data bases.
  • Develop and maintain a single, centralized source of facilities information which is easily accessible to all departments.
  • Develop a means of sorting, processing, manipulating and storing facilities information.
The Commission is implementing AM/FM/GIS in a phased approach. Phase 1 involved a feasibility study to investigate current and fiture operations dealing with geographic data which would benefit from the use of AM/FM/GIS technology. During Phase 2, Graphic Data Systems (GDS) software was selected by the Commission as its GIS, and a data conversion pilot project was conducted for two neighborhoods of the city. As part of the pilot project, the water and sewer facilities data was filly developed and prototype applications were implemented. Based on the results of the pilot, a full-scale automated mapping, facilities management and geographic information system is currently being implemented as the final phase. During this phase a new land base is being developed from aerial photography taken during the spring of 1995 and water and sewer facilities maps are being converted to a digital format. The Commission has contracted for the development of a new land base map and production of digital orthophotos and for conversion of existing water and sewer facilities maps which are registered to the new land base data. The Commission is using a very comprehensive quality control (QC) process, which includes review of hard copy plots of land base and facilities data and subsequent reviews of digital data provided by the conversion contractors. This paper summarizes the quality control (QC) process used by the Commission to check the quality of products delivered by the conversion contractors.

Database Development Activities

Land Base Mapping
new land base is being created from aerial photography taken during the spring of 1995. The land base data includes development of 1“= 100’scale digital planimetric and topographic data as well as digital orthophotography. The production of land base data required the acquisition of color aerial photography at 1”= 600’ scale taken from an altitude of 3,600 feet, and establishment of horizontal and vertical photo control and aerotriangulation.

The planimetric features such as transportation, hydrography, buildings, wetlands and other land features have an accuracy of +/- 2’. These land base features are stereocompiled from the aerial photography described above. The digital orthophotos have a pixel resolution of 1 foot. The topographic data includes 2’ contours and spot elevations derived from a Digital Terrain Model (DTM).

Facilities Conversion
The Commission’s existing 1“= 100’scale water and sewer maps are used as the primary source for conversion of facilities data to digital format. The facilities data is registered to the new land base map developed from the aerial photography, as described above. The facilities data includes graphic data as well as attribute data stored in an Oracle database.

Delivery of Products
The city is divided into 12 areas for the delivery of data. The map sheets associated with these areas are called delivery groups. The delivery groups generally contain 23 map sheets. Deliveries occur on a monthly basis. The planimetric, topographic, and digital orthophoto data is being completed prior to the start of the facilities conversion effort. The same delivery groups apply for both the land base data deliveries and the facilities data deliveries.

Acceptance criteria of Delivered Products
A QC review is performed by the Commission for each delivery of products by the contractor. After QC review of the check plots, confirmation plots or digital data, the Commission determines the status of the product according to the following list: All the products which have systematic errors that impede the review are rejected. The cause of rejections are typically:
  1. A class of features is missing from plot
  2. Plot quality is poor
  3. Overall line quality is unacceptable
  4. An error, such as miscoding of features, is repeated more than 15 times
Rejected products are not completely reviewed by the Commission. The Contractor is required to resubmit the rejected products in same form.

Corrections Required
The QC reviewers make comments for corrections during QC review. These comments maybe on check plots, confirmation plots, or digital data, depending on the stage of the review. In case of check or confirmation plots, the comments for corrections are placed directly on the plots. In the case of digital QC, comments are annotated on a digital GDS drawing which overlays the relevant digital drawing files. In response to these comments, the contractor is required to submit a confirmation plot or new digital data at the Commission’s discretion.

The Commission accepts the submittal of the product. This authorizes the contractor to submit digital data. If the acceptance is of digital data, then the product is filly accepted.

Accepted/BWSC Edit
The Commission determines that required corrections are minor enough to accept the submitted product, however any errors noted will be corrected by the Commission staff once the entire digital delivery group is accepted.

Page 1 of 3
| Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book