Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 1998


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997 
Sessions

Application

Data Distribution

Data Evolution

Field Applications

Integration of the Enterprise

Invited Presentation

People Issues

Scada and Real-Time systems

System Development

User Presentations

User Solution


GITA 1998


Applications


Predicting pipe failures with CMMS/GIS/Modeling


Expert systems
Rule based expert systems are a natural extension of the use of selection rules. Using an expert system, complex selection rules could be formulated that would lead to the selection of high risk facilities. Expert systems offer a mechanism to capture knowledge of experts in the field in an attempt to retain and share their knowledge. Expert systems are not currently part of the GIMS effort. Expert systems have been used for sewer network maintenance in Paris with a limited degree of success and for pavement repair management with some signs of success by the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department.

Predictive statistical methods
Statistical predictive models are based on historical data. Dates of events with attendant descriptive information need to be available to the model. In time, as available information increases, the accuracy of this type of approach should improve. There will be more data available to the models for calibration. Survival analysis using Proportional Hazards Models has been used successfidly to determine the probability of failure for water mains. Development is currently underway based on the use of the Andersen-Gill Proportional Hazards Model. This model can be used to predict multiple future failures. Predicted failure rates can then be used in a cost benefits analysis to determine whether to ignore, repair, or replace the facility.

One disadvantage of the use of statistical predictive models is their inherent complexity. Although attempts will be made to isolate the user from all the complexities of this type of procedure, the user will still be required to have a significant level of understanding of the statistical process in order to produce valid results.

Neural networks
Another method under investigation for predictive modeling involves the use of neural networks. Neural networks are a branch of artificial intelligence that is very good at solving pattern recognition problems. The patterns of attributes and failure events in the database should be detectable by neural networks. The major benefit to using neural networks is their ability to find the patterns in the data without a complete understanding of the predictive processes, in addition they can easily operate on all data types including nominal data. Neural networks offer a solution that requires less knowledge on the part of the user. This can be considered a black box approach.

Spatial analysis
The use of GIS as an integral component of a facility management decision support tool brings an additional set of analytical tools to the system: spatial analysis tools. Operations including buffering and overlay are found in many geographic information systems. Research has shown that breaks often occur in clusters. Spatial analysis tools like Quadrat analysis, Thiessen polygon generation, spatial autocorrelation and fiture analytical techniques may offer new methods for predictive modeling.

System design
The GIS serves as the integrating technology for the other components. The relational database management system is available for tabular and spatial attribute storage. The database is accessible via the facility management front end, and through the GIS tools. Statistical and neural network tools that require more than just tabular data retrieve these data via GIS access methods. Attributes are linked to the spatial entity/item.

Geographic information systems typically provide a wide range of display capabilities. These display functions are closely related to the database contents. Thematic mapping (shading) can be performed based on different variables. Different layers can be overlaid. Geographical measurements can be performed on the screen. Interactive exploratory selection and query is supported to inspect the attributes of particular features.

Conclusions
The development of a decision support tool for facility management planning that incorporates predictive modeling tools will be of significant value to managers and planners. The functionality outlined in this paper will allow managers and planners to analyze the effects of many different factors on failure and failure rate. Developing a comprehensive CMMS is the foundation for giving the end user the ability to build on and develop an accurate Predictive Modeling system. Using and integrating GIS as the central component provides a structure that can facilitate the operation of the different tools necessary to implement a Predictive Modeling system.

Page 3 of 3
| Previous |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book