Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 1998


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997 
Sessions

Application

Data Distribution

Data Evolution

Field Applications

Integration of the Enterprise

Invited Presentation

People Issues

Scada and Real-Time systems

System Development

User Presentations

User Solution


GITA 1998


Data Distribution


Taking your enterprise AM/FM/GIS on the road


  1. Server Based Querying
    At first glance this would appear to be exclusively Intemet and Intranet solutions. But actually, this can use both a thin or a thick client' architecture. In the previous section on Disk Image Replication, the user transported a complete copy of the data with them, wherever they may be, either in the office or in the field. With the use of a server, users can then request information without needing the entire dataset locally.

    Typically, this is the second tier of an implementation schedule. After users and administrators alike, become more familiar with the technology and what it can do for them, people start to become attune to such buzzwords as "latency" and "data currency." As mentioned earlier, the Disk Image Replication method tends to become unruly once a large implementation begins. This is where users need and request for data on a larger scale, and with the data more up to date.

    Server Based Querying can, as mentioned come in many different forms. Most likely, the Records or Drafting Departments maintaining the Spatial Database use this concept themselves. Here, users use the 'Cadillac'of interfaces to input and revise data, typically using clientserver mechanisms to retrieve and store data from a local server.

    But, desktop users such as Engineers, Designers and Planners can use systems to request data from the server as well. In these cases, thick clients tend to be the choice. The local interface is based on a subset of the drafting and maintenance tools used on the design seats. With specific and targeted user interfaces, this class of application is deemed the main driver of the corporate Spatial Database.

    Finally, there are the casual users out in distributed sites or connecting via temporary phone lines that need to query the system. These users typically need to request specific information as well, such as the location of a particular switch, valve or the customer's service connection. These users can make use of a variety of thick or thin clients that can request information from a server and have the required information displayed on their screen automatically. In some instances specialized decision support software aid them in the correct response to a situation happening before them in the field.

    The distinct advantage of this solution, in relation to the others is that this tends to be the least expensive to maintain. The initial implementation costs will tend to be more than the more "primitive" Disk Image Replication methods, which is why most managers will opt for this after the initial roll-out of a project. After the initial phases, however, this tends to be the more cost effective method, if the applications are intuitive and the users trained properly in their use.

    The age of the data in these implementations is the best available today. Here users are looking directly into the corporate Spatial Database during their queries. In high risk situations, is where this really shines. Linestaff climbing poles and connecting services need the latest information, and by using a laptop in the trucks or even in the garage before leaving for a job, they can be assured that the data displayed is the latest available. In most instances, the past practices have been monthly circuit plans, printed out in books of 11x 17" paper on a monthly basis. This can now be replaced with a computer in a boom truck or in a foreman's office in the service garage.

    The one drawback to this method, is the reliance on the network. This is adequate, even desirable in the office or where reliable and fast telephone lines are available, but in other situations, hybrid implementations are optimal.
Table 1: Replication Options available
Option Description Technical complexity Data concurrency Relative cost to implement Cost to maintain Application Requirement
Disk image replication Low Low Low Moderate High
Server based querying Moderate High Moderate Low Varies
Database replication High High Moderate to high Moderate to low minimal

1Thick and Thin clients are a term used to describe the amount of local resources used for an application. The classic thin client is a Web browser with no addition software, used to view simple text on screen. However, in the context of a Spatial Thin client, there will be some minor additional software downloaded to the workstation to view the content. A thick client is typically a stand-alone application that runs in its own memory space and uses its own interface.

Page 2 of 4
| Previous | Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book