A new approach in GIS cost-benefit analysis
Luciand Azpiazu & J.A. Roldos IT Distribution Manager, Iberdrola, S.A. IT Developer Manager, Iberdrola Sistemas, S.A. Gardoqui, 8,48008 BILBAO-SPAIN luciano.azpiazuaiberdrola.es juan.roldosaiberdrola.es
1. Background
Iberdrola is a private electrical utility in Spain, created by the merger of Hidroelectrica Esptiola and Iberduero in 1991. Iberdrola currently supplies energy to 7.9 million customers (38 percent of the Spanish market). The inventory distribution file was begun in the 1970s, and in the 1980s, the first AM/FM systems (based on Intergraph products) were installed in all the distribution territories. Although we continue to collect data and develop applications, we are not obtaining all of the expected benefits. In January of 1997, the Vice President of Distribution recommended both an updated cost-benefit analysis, developed by internal users and external experts, and a new plan to optimize the software applications supported in the SIGRID system (Distribution Facilities Information System, inventory, and cartography). 2. Sigrid Functionalities 2.1 Cartography and inventory The cartography facilities may be viewed as follows:
2.2 Applications Existing applications support maintenance, design, distribution automation, service restoration, planning, and new engineering requests. 3. Cost-Benfit analysis 3.1 Scope of the analysis The analysis considered:
3.2 Quantitative global analysis of benefits for every business process At the beginning, all the distribution business processes were identified, defined, and detailed by activities. Afterwards, their impact (high, medium, or low) on the AM/FM system SIGRID was assessed. The results of the analysis indicated that the high or medium impact corresponds to the following processes:
We have considered two types of benefits.
3.4 Cost earned by business process To evaluate earned cost, it’s important to know the previous and current costs and to forecast them in a future scenario where all the graphic and alphanumeric information would exist. The procedure for the cost-benefit analysis has been:
Year 3: Complete all the information (high and medium voltage). Year 3: Complete all the alphanumeric information (low voltage). Year 5: Complete all the graphic information (low voltage). A summary of the benefits is described below.
3.5 Cost not invested (106 pta)
Benefits refers to the difference between cost earned and cost not invested, grouped by voltage level and type of information. This presupposes that all the software will be implemented in the first year, as will the documentation and user training. Figures and drawings detailing the evaluation will be presented during the conference. The distribution business processes with the higher optimization levels are “Plan and Develop the Network” and “New Request” and have the higher return on investment (ROI). The final analysis does not include qualitative benefits, such as whether the corporative information is more homogeneous and coherent, or if data reliability, customer service, and corporate image are improved. 4. Conclusions The management is convinced that the AM/FM/GIS system is profitable for all the voltage levels. The time span on the return on investment is also important, corresponding to a three-year period. The higher profitability can be grouped as follows:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||