Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 1999


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997 |  
Sessions

Business Applications

Data Development and Evolution

Data Distribution and Access

Engineering and Design Applications

Enterprise Integration

Enterprise Resource Planning

Exploiting Field and Mobile Technologies

Invited Track

Operations Support

People Issues

System Architecture

User Perspectives

Work Management


GITA 1999


Business Applications


BOT (Build, Operate and Transfer) an alternative to traditional data conversion and management


How long would it last?
The capital required for equipment or facilities upgrades will be the main determinant in setting the length-for a BOT contract. Infrastructure- development projects funded by means of BOT contracts in developing countries will typically require capital investments of $50 million or more and an operating period of greater than 10 years. A number of dynamic factors affect the overall structure of the contract and particularly the length of time required for the concessionaire to achieve a break-even on the capital investment. In proposing a BOT concession to an existing owner, the following factors m-ust be considered and allowed for:

Factor Consideration
Capital Requirement Capital The greater the capital amount required to upgrade the facility or Requirement purchase equipment, the longer the operating contract period should be.
Profit Sharing Formula A 50:50 profit sharing formula is a useful starting point and is quite Formula a common arrangement in international projects. The impact of other factors will increase or decrease the proportional breakdown.
Business Operating Risk The nature of the enterprise will dictate a longer or shorter period of return based on a risk factor used within that industry. Similarly, for the concessionaire, risk may be mitigated or augmented by lengthening the period of the operating contract.
Cost of Capital Lower cost of capital will allow the concessionaire to achieve a break-even point in a shorter period of time, all things being equal.
Nature of Revenue Stream Certain types of revenue offer greater security in terms of a con- tinuing revenue stream. Enterprises in which the customer usage levels are discretionary (customers have a choice of competitors or may choose to forego the service being offered) entail a higher level of risk and will impact the other factors.

In the case of a BOT project, the project team, acting as the releasing authority for the work, must establish the financial feasibility of the BOT project as a stand-alone business operation. This will entail the collection of the necessary detail to allow a bidding consortium to develop a business plan for their intended operation of the work. The key information for the project team will be the necessary return on investment to be derived from the profit-sharing scheme. This will determine how the revenue will be distributed once a consortium undertakes the work. An RFP will then be put out for tender and a list of bidders, each providing a business plan, will respond. The bidders will typically represent a consortium of companies, each bringing a particular skill to the team. The proponent consortium will be selected from the bidders based on what capital upgrade is being offered and how large a revenue cut is being proposed for the operator. Flowchart C illustrates this arrangement.

Flowchatt C - AM/FM BOT Project Methodology


Some thoughts regarding the BOT approach:
When applied to infrastructure development, the BOT approach is often referred to as a publicprivate partnership. In essence, this partnership is the distinguishing characteristic, whether applied to a public or a private enterprise. The BOT approach represents an expansive and flexible means to leverage the capability of the concessionaire while reducing the operating expense and increasing the service performance for the enterprise owner.

Often, the most effective means of mobilizing resources to undertake a BOT project is the formation of a consortium of participating companies around a project company formed specifically for the duration of the project. This approach requires each participant to subcontract to the project company and offers the advantage of reducing the risk for individual participants.

While infrastructure development projects really developed as national level opportunities, the clear trend has been toward implementing the same project financing and operating models on a smaller and smaller scale, making the BOT approach a possible option for many undertakings previously thought of as unsuitable. More opportunities will be found at the local government and private industry level as a result of the growing awareness of the advantages that the BOT approach has to offer.

Page 3 of 3
| Previous |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book