Logo GISdevelopment.net

GISdevelopment > Proceedings > GITA > 1999


GITA 2002 | GITA 2001 | GITA 2000 | GITA 1999 | GITA 1998 | GITA 1997 |  
Sessions

Business Applications

Data Development and Evolution

Data Distribution and Access

Engineering and Design Applications

Enterprise Integration

Enterprise Resource Planning

Exploiting Field and Mobile Technologies

Invited Track

Operations Support

People Issues

System Architecture

User Perspectives

Work Management


GITA 1999


Engineering and Design Applications
Printer Friendly Format

Page 1 of 7
| Next |


Patterns for building Utility Data Models

Michael Zeiler
Environmental Systems Research Institute
380 New York Street
Redlands, CA 92373
E-mail: mzeiler@esri.com


Design Challenges of Building Models
Any person who builds a utility data model quickly realizes that this is a daunting task. The data modeler’s work is made complicated by the need to reconcile several distinct and sometimes contradictory aspects of representing an object.

There are three basic representations of the objects that comprise a utility system:
  • As parts of network which can be traced,
  • as features on a map which can be drawn to cartographic conventions, and
  • as rows within corporate database tables upon which queries can be made.

The essential problem of the data modeler is that objects in these three representations do not have a simple-correlation with each other. A feature- on a map may represent a number of elements in a logical network. Some objects exist in corporate databases but are invisible on the map. Network elements and database rows may potentially have a many-to-many relationship.

An indispensable goal of the data model is to keep synchronous the elements of these disjoint representations of a utility network.

Network desire challenges
The network representation of utility objects is of the greatest interest to those who use the GIS for dispatch and operations during an outage or when doing engineering analysis. These are some situations when the network view should harmonize with cartographic and tabular views:


  • A given line section in a utility network might represent multiple transport media such cable pairs in telephony, phases of electric power, and multiple circuits.
  • The topology of a utility network is dynamic and defined by the current status of isolation devices such as switches and valves. These objects may control a flow state by supervisory command or autonomously in response to a flow condition such as pressure or voltage.
  • Large utility systems can quickly overwhelm a geographic database with hundreds of thousands or millions of edges and nodes. Many utility networks can be sub-divided into primary and secondary segments. It would be desirable for the network model to allow two-level traces that optimize performance by tracing secondary segments only at the source or destination of the trace.
Page 1 of 7
| Next |

Applications | Technology | Policy | History | News | Tenders | Events | Interviews | Career | Companies | Country Pages | Books | Publications | Education | Glossary | Tutorials | Downloads | Site Map | Subscribe | GIS@development Magazine | Updates | Guest Book